verification-loop
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when verifying shipped work on prod, standing up the autonomous verifier, running the verification loop, confirming a spec is actually done end-to-end, or checking whether shipped criteria are hollow. Trigger phrases include "verify shipped work", "stand up the verifier", "run the verification loop", "is this actually done on prod", "check for hollow specs", "autonomous post-ship review".
- Reads credentials
84 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lhbsaa/apex-unifiedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ahmadvahidi/skill-atlastheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- shkodnik1917/claude-brainlabtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemontheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- ek0212/agent-ready-repo-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use everything-claude-code, everything-claude-code-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
InfopibeSkilleverything-claude-code
Also in 10 projects that use this
mryeastcodeSkilleverything-claude-code-conventions
Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.
Also in 8 projects that use this
InfopibeSkillinvestor-materials
Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.
Also in 25 projects that use this
niloykumarbarmanSkillagent-sort
Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.
Also in 8 projects that use this
tpavanipradeepSkillnextjs-turbopack
Next.js 16+ and Turbopack — incremental bundling, FS caching, dev speed, and when to use Turbopack vs webpack.
Also in 15 projects that use this
CodeWithBehnamSkilldmux-workflows
Multi-agent orchestration using dmux (tmux pane manager for AI agents). Patterns for parallel agent workflows across Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other harnesses. Use when running multiple agent sessions in parallel or coordinating multi-agent development workflows.
Also in 17 projects that use this
- +1 more from Infopibe
Other versions84 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 84
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246ksame name
- Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar★ 5.9ksame name
- xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh★ 1.9ksame name
- openJiuwen-ai/agent-core★ 464same name
- loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes★ 272same name
- Resgrid/Core★ 238same name
- cloudnative-co/claude-code-starter-kit★ 153same name
- cohen-liel/hivemind★ 108same name
- MRCalderon3D/everything-game-dev-code★ 105same name
- tpavanipradeep/everything-claude-code★ 104same name
74 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Files
Verification Loop
Overview
Observe the running product. Stay blind to how it was built.
The verification loop is a standing autonomous reviewer that drives shipped work from "orc says done" to "verified green on prod". It observes the deployed product via a headless browser, assigns typed evidence to each acceptance criterion, judges cross-vendor (Codex primary, Claude fallback), and loops to convergence — filing correctives for hollow work, escalating taste/blockers, and never touching the build.
Three Core Invariants
- Blind-but-watching. The verifier never sees the build, the diff, or the builder's reasoning. The judge receives only the typed evidence artifact — never the worker's explanation.
- Evidence-type-locked-to-criterion-type. A UI criterion requires a DOM/screenshot observation. A grep is auto-fail for a UI criterion. No criterion closes without observed, type-matched evidence.
- Verifier owns the verdict; the builder cannot overwrite it. Verdicts live in
~/.claude/ledger/verified/<spec_id>.yml— a separate namespace the builder'sset/registercommands never touch.
The Two-Body Warning
The loop converges only if orc is running and consuming correctives. If filed items sit unconsumed for N ticks, escalate to NEEDS-HUMAN.jsonl — do not file forever into the void.
The 8-Step Tick
Run with: node ~/.claude/verification-loop/tick.mjs [--spec NNN-slug] [--dry-run] [--force]
- Detect new ship — compare deployed sha vs last
PROGRESS.jsonlentry. No new sha → idle-cheap return, no browser spun. - Selfcheck — fail loud if any credential missing/empty or chrome absent. Write to
NEEDS-HUMAN.jsonland halt. Never silent-continue. - Auth + load criteria —
acquire()storageState once per day (7-day TTL). Pull acceptance criteria from the spec file.pinSpecSha()to guard against silent scope reduction. - Observe per criterion —
selectObservationLayer()routes to DOM (aria snapshot + innerText), VISION (screenshot + bounded binary question), or DOM_INTERACTION. RuncallApi()for backend criteria. Bothverify_periods. RunrunIpt()when a gaming trigger fires. - Judge —
judge(criterion, evidenceText, {runCodex, runClaude}). Token/reason contradiction → flag UNCLEAR → re-judge once → escalate if still unclear. Judge calls are sequential (never concurrent — subscription rate limit). - Assign verdict + resolve:
CONFIRMED→recordVerdict()+spec_ledger.py verify NNN CONFIRMED --judge codex --evidence <ref>HOLLOW / MISSING / REGRESSION→ escalate corrective toNEEDS-HUMAN.jsonl(≤3 attempts; on exhaustion → BOUNCED, escalate)DATA-GAP / NOT-RUN→ ops noteSUSPECTED-GAMING / TASTE / blocker→ escalate, never spin
- Re-probe transient —
probe.mjscatches 502/503 deploy windows, retries once after 30s, tagsDEPLOY_IN_PROGRESS. Never cry P0 on a deploy window. - Scope reduction + progress —
detectScopeReduction()→ escalate any missing-with-no-evidence criteria.appendProgress(). Reschedule cost-aware.
Verdict Taxonomy
| Verdict | Meaning | Action |
CONFIRMED | Criterion observed working | Write to verified/ namespace |
HOLLOW | Exists in code, doesn't work | File corrective |
MISSING | Not implemented | File corrective |
REGRESSION | Was working, now broken | File corrective |
NOT-RUN | Operational step skipped | Ops note |
DATA-GAP | Code ok, source data absent | Ops note |
TASTE | Subjective judgement call | Escalate to Ephraim |
SUSPECTED-GAMING | IPT metamorphic relation failed | Escalate; R7 2nd-case rule before labelling systemic |
UNCLEAR | Token/reason contradiction in judge output | Re-judge once; escalate if still unclear |
BOUNCED | Trial budget (≤3) exhausted | Escalate to Ephraim |
Durable State Files (under runs/<date>/)
| File | Purpose |
PROGRESS.jsonl | Append-only event log — sha, criteria checked, verdicts. Resume by reading. |
VERIFICATION-LEDGER.jsonl | Per-criterion verdict + evidence ref. Source of truth for "checked". |
NEEDS-HUMAN.jsonl | Loud escalation list — taste, blockers, gaming, exhausted budgets. |
SPEC-PINS.json | Criteria set pinned at handover. Scope-reduction guard (U3). |
Verifier-owned verdict files: ~/.claude/ledger/verified/<spec_id>.yml
Smoke-Test a Single Criterion
cd ~/.claude/verification-loop
set -a; source <repo root>/.env; set +a
node tick.mjs --spec 064-asin-page-unmapped-asin-blank --criterion "returns 200" --dry-runAutonomous Cron Path vs Attended Debugging
- Cron (autonomous):
node tick.mjs— usesprobe.mjs/shoot.mjs/api.mjsfor observations. No MCP. - Attended debugging only: chrome-devtools MCP is for interactive investigation when you want to drive a browser in the current conversation. Do NOT wire the MCP into the autonomous cron tick.
Escalation Expiry
An escalation unresolved for >2 ticks should trigger a human notification (append to NEEDS-HUMAN.jsonl with reason: unresolved_escalation), not another corrective attempt.
Config Location
~/.claude/verification-loop/config/<your-project>.json — the only AS-specific surface. Swap in another project's config to reuse the harness.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

