intelligence/decision-framework
Skill10 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when making or advising on decisions with multiple options — provides structured decision-making frameworks that ensure decisions are rational, well-documented, and revisitable. Prevents decision paralysis and gut-only decisions. Default skill for Starlight Navigator and Starlight Prime.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Arcanea-Labs/Starlight-Intelligence-Systemword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Arcanea-Labs/Starlight-Intelligence-System★ 10100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository49 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- site/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/hooks/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- site/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/editorial.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/starlight-agents.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/starlight-core.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/starlight-memory.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/starlight-voice.mdcCursor rule
- frank-brand-editorSkill
- agent-hygieneSkill
- estate-guardSkill
- SKILL.mdSkill
- crypto-intelligenceSkill
- agent-forgeSkill
- skill-forgeSkill
- system-forgeSkill
- taste-engineSkill
- integration/ecosystem-syncSkill
- integration/repo-bridgeSkill
- integration/transmission-protocolSkill
- integration/universal-adapterSkill
- intelligence/hermes-searchSkill
- intelligence/pattern-recognitionSkill
- intelligence/strategic-reasoningSkill
- intelligence/systems-thinkingSkill
- heartSkill
- storageSkill
- memory/capture-disciplineSkill
- memory/context-preservationSkill
- memory/insight-distillationSkill
- memory/knowledge-synthesisSkill
- memory/memory-consolidationSkill
- sis-memory-orchestratorSkill
- memory/vault-managementSkill
- agent-creatorSkill
- orchestration/context-engineeringSkill
- orchestration/gencreator-stackSkill
- orchestration/hermes-swarmSkill
- orchestration/multi-agent-coordinationSkill
- orchestration/parallel-executionSkill
- orchestration/workflow-designSkill
- workflow-skill-creatorSkill
- safety/mutation-approvalSkill
- safety/permission-gateSkill
- safety/private-public-splitSkill
- safety/secret-detectorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Default for: Starlight Navigator, Starlight Prime
- Distinctive: line 32
If not, examine what criterion was underweighted
- Distinctive: line 39
Document the reversibility of the chosen path
- Distinctive: line 45
Ask: "Why did it fail?"
- Distinctive: line 53
Document the decision context (why was this decision needed?)
- Distinctive: line 54
Document the options considered
- Distinctive: line 55
Document the evaluation (framework used, scores)
- Distinctive: line 56
Document the decision and reasoning
- Distinctive: line 57
Document expected outcomes and metrics
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Decision Framework
"Good decisions come from good frameworks, not good luck."
When This Skill Activates
- Making or advising on decisions with multiple options
- Keywords: "decide", "decision", "choose", "evaluate", "compare", "should we"
- Default for: Starlight Navigator, Starlight Prime
What This Skill Does
Provides structured decision-making frameworks that ensure decisions are rational, well-documented, and revisitable. Prevents decision paralysis and gut-only decisions.
Procedures
Procedure 1: Decision Matrix
- List all options (minimum 2, ideally 3-5)
- Define criteria for evaluation
- Weight criteria by importance (total = 100%)
- Score each option on each criterion (1-10)
- Calculate weighted scores
- Identify the winner and runner-up
- Sanity-check: does the quantitative winner feel right?
- If not, examine what criterion was underweighted
Procedure 2: Reversibility Analysis
- For each option, assess: Is this reversible?
- Reversible decisions → Decide fast, learn fast
- Irreversible decisions → Decide carefully, gather more data
- Document the reversibility of the chosen path
- Plan escape routes for partially-reversible decisions
Procedure 3: Pre-Mortem
- Assume the decision has been made and failed
- Ask: "Why did it fail?"
- List all plausible failure modes
- For each failure mode, assess probability and impact
- Identify mitigations for high-risk failures
- Incorporate mitigations into the decision plan
Procedure 4: Decision Record
- Document the decision context (why was this decision needed?)
- Document the options considered
- Document the evaluation (framework used, scores)
- Document the decision and reasoning
- Document expected outcomes and metrics
- Store in Strategic Vault as a Decision Note
- Set review checkpoint (when to revisit)
Integration Points
- Vault: Strategic Vault (decision history), Wisdom Vault (decision principles)
- Agents: Navigator (primary), Prime (major decisions), All (decision support)
- Notes: Decision Note template
Quality Criteria
- Are at least 3 options genuinely considered?
- Are criteria weighted and explicit?
- Is reversibility assessed?
- Has a pre-mortem been conducted for high-stakes decisions?
- Is the decision recorded for future reference?
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

