conjure
Skill0 starsChanged 55 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turn a finished plan, spec, or decision map into ready-for-agent GitHub issues, each with an agent brief and wired in dependency order, so a build session can take them one at a time. Use when asked to file the build tickets, break this spec into issues, turn the plan into tickets, slice the work, or /conjure.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 22
If a skill rule requires a pause or leaves requested work unfinished, name and link to the exact SKILL.md and quote the rule.
- Very specific: line 65
Read docs/agents/issue-tracker.md when it exists.
- Distinctive: line 93
A spec path or another issue: Read it in full.
- Distinctive: line 95
Blank: Use the plan in this conversation.
- Very specific: line 97
Read CONTEXT.md when it exists, and any ADR in the area.
- Distinctive: line 101
Write two lines before slicing:
- Distinctive: line 112
If the source still has an open decision that no slice can avoid, stop here and say what needs deciding.
- Distinctive: line 143
When the source is a map, post one comment on it listing the tickets in build order, each as its title wrapped around its link:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- BEGIN MANA PERSONA -->Persona at invocation
Before conversational narration, read Persona: and Style: in the active project's ## Agent skills block from CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md. Prefer the file containing the block, then an existing file; ties use CLAUDE.md. A symlink pair is one file. Read the saved value anew on each invocation, including from a subdirectory using the project root. No accessible project or no line means ordinary behavior. Do not search another project or global settings for this preference.
During the Persona at invocation stage, archmage on either line loads this skill's own references/archmage.md for the active workflow. off or an absent value leaves ordinary behavior active. An unknown value leaves ordinary behavior active and gets a brief explanation when conversational output is allowed; it does not stop the work. Explicit conversation instructions override the saved voice without writing settings. A request to enable Archmage for this workflow also loads the local reference.
Apply the voice only to lead-agent conversation. Deliverables, specialist roles, reply-only responses, and JSON-only output retain their contracts, with no added narration. End the persona with this workflow unless the user requests otherwise or a Style: line names archmage, which keeps the voice on for the whole session.
<!-- END MANA PERSONA -->Conjure
Honor the user's explicit instructions and decisions already made in this conversation over this skill's workflow defaults. A rule this file states with never, or as read-only, is a gate: it holds whatever the conversation says, and an instruction to cross one is declined and reported. Continue authorized work; ask only about unresolved choices that would materially change the result. Preparing or reviewing work does not authorize publishing it.
If a skill rule requires a pause or leaves requested work unfinished, name and link to the exact SKILL.md and quote the rule. Then explain what decision or prerequisite is missing. Distinguish a required gate from your interpretation.
The deciding is done. A map, a spec, or the plan in this conversation says what should be true. This skill slices that into build tickets sized for one session each, writes a brief on every one, and files them in the order they can be built.
Operating principles
- Decisions first. A ticket is filed only when its question is already answered. An open decision goes back to the person, never into a brief.
- One session per ticket. A slice that needs two sessions is two tickets with a blocking edge.
- The brief is the contract. A later build session reads the brief and nothing else. Write it for a reader who has none of this conversation.
- Refer by name. In anything a person reads, use the ticket title with the link wrapped inside it.
- Write to the tracker through the contract. On Linear or Jira, use the host's connector for
create,ensure-labels,wire, andcommentwhen one is present. Otherwise runscripts/tickets.sh. GitHub always goes through the script. Never write the tracker any other way.
<SKILL_DIR> is the absolute directory this SKILL.md lives in. Substitute the real path every time it appears. Do not assign it to a shell variable first: a sandboxed or worktree-isolated session refuses bash "$VAR/script.sh" because it cannot resolve the path to read the script.
Scripts
scripts/tickets.sh creates tickets, labels, blocking edges, and comments on GitHub (git and gh only), Linear, or Jira (python3 and the tracker's environment variables). Exit 3 means the token cannot write. tickets.sh -h prints usage.
Arguments
Parse tokens, then treat the remainder as the source.
| Token | Effect |
you-pick | Accept every recommended slice and edge in the Stage 2 round. Same meaning as the user saying "make the decisions" or "you pick". |
| Input | Source |
| none | The plan or spec already in this conversation. If none is obvious, stop and ask. |
| number or issue URL | That issue. Labelled scry:map (or wayfinder:map): the map. Any other issue: its body is the spec. |
| a path | That file is the spec |
Execution spine
- Load the source and the project's language (Stage 1).
- Slice it and agree the order (Stage 2).
- File the tickets and wire the edges (Stage 3).
- Record the build order and report (Stage 4).
Tracker
Read docs/agents/issue-tracker.md when it exists. Its Tracker: line names the tracker and its Adapter flags: line gives the flags for the bundled script. Missing file: GitHub, no flags. On a GitHub Enterprise host, pass GH_HOST=<host> inline too.
The operations below are view, ensure-labels, create, wire, and comment. On Linear or Jira, when the host exposes a connector for that tracker, use it for them; it is already authenticated. Inside an Orca worktree (ORCA_WORKTREE_ID is set and command -v orca succeeds), orca linear is such a connector for Linear; orca linear --help lists its operations. Otherwise run the script with the adapter flags. GitHub always goes through the script. Never mix the two in one run. For local, write the tickets as references/scratch.md describes. For other, follow the tracker file's Conventions by hand.
Stage 1: Load
A map. Fetch it:
bash "<SKILL_DIR>/scripts/tickets.sh" <adapter flags> view IDID is a tracker id or a GitHub, Linear, or Jira issue URL; the script extracts the id. Read Destination, Notes, Decisions so far, and every owning document Notes names. Then check for unfinished deciding: on GitHub,
gh issue list --state open --search "Part of #NUMBER" --json number,title,labels
if ! children="$(
gh api --paginate repos/OWNER/REPO/issues/NUMBER/sub_issues \
--jq '.[] | select(.state == "open") | "\(.number)\t\(.title)\t\([.labels[].name] | join(","))"'
)"; then
echo "Unable to verify map children" >&2
exit 1
fi
printf '%s\n' "$children"and elsewhere the way the tracker file's Wayfinding operations section lists a map's children. An open child still labelled scry:* or wayfinder:* means a decision is still pending. Stop, name those tickets, and say the map is not ready to build from. A failed gh api call stops the workflow.
A spec path or another issue. Read it in full.
Blank. Use the plan in this conversation.
Read CONTEXT.md when it exists, and any ADR in the area. Use the project's words in every title and brief.
Resolve the label strings. When docs/agents/triage-labels.md exists, read it and take the strings it maps for bug, enhancement, and ready-for-agent. Missing file: the string equals the role name.
Write two lines before slicing:
Destination: <what is true when every ticket is closed>
Labels: <category string>, <ready string>Stage 2: Slice
Load references/slicing.md and follow it. Present the slices as one round: each with a title, a one-line summary, and the tickets it waits on, plus a recommended order. Wait for the answer. you-pick accepts the recommendations.
If the source still has an open decision that no slice can avoid, stop here and say what needs deciding.
Stage 3: File
Load references/agent-brief.md. Ensure the labels exist once per session:
bash "<SKILL_DIR>/scripts/tickets.sh" <adapter flags> ensure-labels --color d73a4a <category strings>
bash "<SKILL_DIR>/scripts/tickets.sh" <adapter flags> ensure-labels --color 0e8a16 <ready string>Create one issue per slice. The body is the brief. When the source is a map, the first line of the body is Builds toward: [<map title>](<map url>). Do not write Part of # and do not attach the ticket as a child of the map; that would make a map-walking session mistake it for a decision ticket.
bash "<SKILL_DIR>/scripts/tickets.sh" <adapter flags> create "<title>" --label <category string> --label <ready string> <<'EOF'
Builds toward: [<map title>](<map url>)
<brief from references/agent-brief.md>
EOFWire blocking edges in a second pass, once every ticket has an id:
bash "<SKILL_DIR>/scripts/tickets.sh" <adapter flags> wire CHILD_ID BLOCKER_IDExit 3 from the script means this token cannot write issues (usually HTTP 403). Read references/scratch.md and follow it. Do not keep retrying.
Stage 4: Record
When the source is a map, post one comment on it listing the tickets in build order, each as its title wrapped around its link:
bash "<SKILL_DIR>/scripts/tickets.sh" <adapter flags> comment MAP_ID <<'EOF'
## Build order
1. [<title>](<url>)
2. [<title>](<url>), after 1
EOFReport
Conjure: <destination in a few words>
Filed: <n> tickets
Order:
1. <title> (<url>)
2. <title> (<url>), after 1
Unspecified: <anything the source left open, or none>References
| Reference | Load at | Purpose |
references/slicing.md | Stage 2 | What a one-session slice is, and the round that agrees the order |
references/agent-brief.md | Stage 3 | The brief a build session reads |
references/scratch.md | Stage 3, exit 3 only | Local tickets when GitHub writes fail |
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- frankieramirez/mana★ 155% same
Wrote their own version · 2
- Alexander-Tyagunov/magician★ 14same name
- Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library★ 7same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

