knowledge-mapping
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Maps concepts, components, flows, APIs, SDKs, configuration areas, security controls, operations, observability points, and failure scenarios.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- audience-alignmentSkill
- document-architectureSkill
- examples-and-edge-casesSkill
- glossary-builderSkill
- output-formatsSkill
- product-discoverySkill
- publishingSkill
- section-writerSkill
- technical-documentation-frameworkSkill
- technical-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 63
Keep this phase structured.
- Distinctive: line 64
Prefer tables for component and configuration mapping.
- Distinctive: line 66
Do not introduce architecture that the user did not provide unless explicitly creating a proposed design.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Knowledge Mapping Skill
Purpose
Turn product information into structured technical knowledge that can be used to write documentation.
Output format
# Knowledge Map
## Core Concepts
## Component Map
| Component | Responsibility | Inputs | Outputs | Dependencies | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
## Main User Flows
## Runtime Flows
## Data Flows
## API Surface
## SDK Surface
## Configuration Areas
## Integration Points
## Security Controls
## Operational Concerns
## Observability Points
## Failure Scenarios
## Known UnknownsRequired thinking
For every major component, identify:
- Its responsibility
- Its input
- Its output
- Its dependencies
- Its configuration
- Its failure modes
- Its observability signals
Rules
- Keep this phase structured.
- Prefer tables for component and configuration mapping.
- Mark uncertainty clearly.
- Do not introduce architecture that the user did not provide unless explicitly creating a proposed design.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

