depth-psychology
Skill1 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Depth-psychology knowledge base (psychoanalytic lens): ego vs. false ego, the conditioned mind vs. the soul, inner child, repression and projection, fear/anxiety/addiction read as symptoms of childhood experience, partner-as-parent dynamics, family and parenting, psychotherapy and dream reading, power, manipulation and coercive control, group conformity, workplace respect, and myths/religion read as psychological projection. Use when you need to understand why a person, character, team or audience behaves a certain way, read the motive behind hostility, jealousy, insecurity or blind loyalty, write psychologically credible characters or brand stories with archetypes, spot manipulation red flags, frame feedback without triggering defences, or reflect on one's own patterns — even if the user just says 'psychology', 'why does he act like this', 'inner child', 'ego', 'projection', 'manipulation' or 'what does this dream mean'. Separates this model's own claims from mainstream psychology; not clinical advice.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- art-directorSkill
- awesome-readmeSkill
- brand-strategy-storytellingSkill
- creative-directorSkill
- designcraft-expertSkill
- effectcraft-expertSkill
- ffmpegSkill
- filmcraft-expertSkill
- freelance-designer-opsSkill
- geo-ai-visibilitySkill
- graphic-designerSkill
- image-gen-promptsSkill
- jevSkill
- llm-wikiSkill
- marketing-mbaSkill
- photocraft-expertSkill
- presentation-designSkill
- pricing-and-sales-negotiationSkill
- public-speaking-persuasionSkill
- seedance-promptsSkill
- slide-software-techniquesSkill
- social-algorithmSkill
- ux-ui-expertSkill
- vectorcraft-expertSkill
- video-editorSkill
- workshop-facilitationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Without arguments: use the core model below as a lens.
- Distinctive: line 24
No home remedies: Don't pass on self-help tips for acute panic or illness (flagged in ch05).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Depth Psychology
Chapters: 8 | Corpus: ~185 theoretical transcripts on depth psychology | Generated: 2026-11-05
How to Use This Skill
- Without arguments: use the core model below as a lens.
- With a topic (
jealousy,manipulation,inner child,dreams,fear of change…): open the chapter from the Topic Index before answering. - With a chapter (
ch05): load that chapter. - Quick lookups: glossary.md for terms, patterns.md for ready-made lenses, cheatsheet.md for tables (psyche model, fear gradient, defences, red flags, dream symbols, myths, evidence check).
Ground rules (read before answering)
- Present it as a model, not as settled science. This is a psychoanalytic worldview ("in this model…"). Every chapter ends with a Caveats section separating ideas with mainstream support (repression, projection, attachment, harm of physical punishment, conformity, coercive control) from the model's own single-cause or contested claims (no heritability of mental illness, illness as purely psychosomatic, dismissal of CBT, unsourced abuse statistics, gender generalisations). Use the Caveats whenever the answer matters.
- A lens, not a diagnosis. Use it to understand motives, write, communicate and reflect. Never diagnose a real person, never use it to accuse someone (especially of child abuse) and never present it as therapy. Real symptoms → a qualified professional; risk of self-harm → emergency services or a crisis line, immediately.
- No home remedies. Don't pass on self-help tips for acute panic or illness (flagged in ch05).
- Esoteric material is out of scope (magic, "astral", alchemy as practice, reincarnation). If asked, treat it as belief, not fact.
Core Model
The psyche. A reasoning mind (useful, keep it) sits beside a conditioned mind: the rules, fears and "description of the world" absorbed from parents and society (the "Mind Matrix"). Beneath both live the soul (non-theological: the felt emotional life) and instinct (an innate "wisdom of the species"). Suffering comes from the conditioned mind overruling soul and instinct. Awareness = knowing what you actually feel, doubting what you were taught, judging only from experience ("did you live it or read it?").
Ego is healthy; the false ego isn't. The plain "I" should be kept. The false ego is a defensive identity built to please the parents' mirror: the child prefers "I'm not worth it" to "they don't love me", then props up a secondary identity with career, looks, money and approval. Hostility, arrogance and the need to be at the centre are read as defence of that fragile construct → ask "what is this person defending?" before answering the attack. The "can I change my mind?" test separates a real opinion from a defended identity.
Repression → projection → distorted reality. What isn't felt is repressed; repressed material is projected onto partners, bosses, leaders, groups and gods. People then flee unhappiness through disapproved escapes (alcohol, gambling, ultras) or approved ones (work, study, shopping, career). Symptoms are containers: insomnia, phobias, compulsions and addictions are read as signals of unprocessed childhood experience, not vices. The fear gradient: fear → anxiety → anguish → panic → madness; a phobia is a false target for a fear whose real object is hidden.
Love replays childhood. The partner often stands in for a parent: jealousy, fear of abandonment, affective dependency and "choosing the bad boy" re-enact early bonds. Reciprocity is the health thermometer of a relationship; love and forgiveness cannot be commanded (you can require behaviour, never feeling). Understanding ≠ forgiving ≠ condemning.
Family as the first institution of power. The traditional family is read as training for obedience. The alternative: side with the child (explain rules, allow dissent, apologise, no hitting, ask real questions, don't presume to know your child). No duty to forgive parents who harmed knowingly; forgiving ≠ excusing a good-faith error.
Therapy and dreams. Effective therapy works on causes, not effects. Good-analyst checklist: boundaries, non-directive, confidential, welcomes the patient's aggression, empathy without collusion. Dreams are personality integrators that slip past the mind's censor; symbols (water, house, tree, animals, snake, death, teeth, money) mean something only relative to the dreamer.
Power, manipulation, groups. Authority attracts the projection of the parent: idealisation and demonisation are two sides of one split; mature judgment means staying on the line (evaluating, neither idolising nor condemning). Victims can become perpetrators through identification with the aggressor. Coercive-control red flags: isolation, induced guilt, escalating demands, "only I understand you". Majorities, parties and fandoms trade belonging for thought (the majority myth). Aggression should be proportionate to the harm; insistence signals insecurity. At work, a respect ladder applies: "what you let pass becomes the new normal".
Myths and belief, read psychologically. God as a projected, stronger parent; faith as an inherited package; angry defence of a belief as a sign of inner doubt; the just-world belief. Myths (Medusa, Orpheus and Eurydice, Penelope, the Gordian knot, the triple goddess, Parsifal's unasked question) are reusable story templates — and myths get rewritten by whoever holds power.
Chapter Index
| # | Title | Key frameworks |
| ch01 | Ego, False Self and Identity | ego vs. false ego, primary mirror, secondary identity, "can I change my mind?" |
| ch02 | Awareness: Mind, Soul and Instinct | conditioned vs. reasoning mind, Mind Matrix, escapes from reality, mind vs. soul speaking |
| ch03 | Relationships, Love, Sexuality and the Sexes | partner-as-parent, exogenous/endogenous jealousy, reciprocity, affective dependency |
| ch04 | Family, Parents, Children and Childhood | siding with the child, hidden parent, no duty to forgive, parenting programme |
| ch05 | Fears, Anxiety, Addictions and Disorders | symptom-as-container, fear gradient, false target, split parent |
| ch06 | Psychotherapy, the Unconscious and Dreams | effective therapy, good-analyst checklist, personality integrators, dream symbols |
| ch07 | Power, Manipulation, Violence and Society | idealisation/demonisation, staying on the line, coercive-control red flags, respect ladder |
| ch08 | Myths, Symbols and Belief | God as projected parent, belief package, just-world belief, myth templates |
Topic Index
- Abandonment, jealousy, dependency → ch03
- Addictions, smoking, gambling, insomnia → ch05
- Anger, aggression, revenge → ch05, ch07
- Archetypes / storytelling with myths → ch08, ch02
- Authority, leaders, politics, fandom → ch07
- Brand / audience insight → ch01, ch02, ch07 (Applications sections)
- Bullying, violence, war → ch07
- Children, parenting, siblings, school → ch04
- Dreams → ch06
- Ego, self-esteem, insecurity, narcissism → ch01, ch05
- Feedback, hostile people, team climate → ch01, ch07
- Fear of change, fear of death → ch01, ch05
- Forgiveness → ch03, ch04, ch08
- Inner child → ch01, ch04
- Manipulation / coercive control → ch07
- Projection, repression → ch02, ch05, ch06
- Public speaking (mind vs. soul) → ch02
- Religion, belief, karma → ch08
- Sexuality, gender roles → ch03
- Therapy, choosing an analyst → ch06
- Workplace respect, assertiveness → ch07
Related skills
public-speaking-persuasion— bias/fallacy catalogs, persuasion ethics.ux-ui-expert(ch20) — behavioural psychology in product design.creative-director— insight mining and character-driven copy.
Scope & Limits
One coherent depth-psychology worldview, distilled with caveats. Not evidence-based clinical psychology, not therapy, not a diagnostic tool. For research-backed claims, check the evidence table in cheatsheet.md or primary literature.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

