agentleFS
fqmyysjjdfqmyysjjd/agent-feed/.claude/skills/engineering-planning/SKILL.md

engineering-planning

Skill4 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use before implementation, fix, refactor, tests, file creation, or project-structure changes to decide placement, reuse, ownership, and maintainable integration before editing.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill before any task that writes code, creates files, changes tests, moves project structure, introduces dependencies, or changes …

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Search existing code, tests, helpers, templates, scripts, and docs for reusable behavior before creating anything new.

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    Check whether the placement preserves project structure, source-of-truth ownership, public contracts, configuration boundaries, and …

    line 33
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not create a new file until checking whether an existing owner should be extended.

    line 56
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not put reusable protocol behavior into project-specific docs.

    line 57
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not put project-specific constraints into reusable Agent Feed rules or skills.

    line 58
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not duplicate adapter-specific behavior when a canonical source can generate it.

    line 59
  8. Distinctive:

    Do not introduce a helper, abstraction, dependency, or directory only to make the current patch look organized.

    line 60
  9. Very specific:

    If placement or ownership is unclear and the decision affects future maintenance, apply .agents/rules/decision-gates.md before editing.

    line 61
  10. Distinctive:

    After using this skill, the AI should be able to state:

    line 65

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Engineering Planning

Required Use

Use this skill before any task that writes code, creates files, changes tests, moves project structure, introduces dependencies, or changes implementation behavior.

This skill exists to prevent "just add a file" work. The output must explain where the change belongs, what can be reused, and how the implementation will remain maintainable.

Required Reading

  1. .agents/rules/outcome-boundary.md
  2. .agents/project/README.md
  3. .agents/project/project-structure.md
  4. .agents/project/architecture-boundaries.md
  5. .agents/domain/contracts.md
  6. The nearest existing module, helper, adapter, command, test, or document that already owns related behavior.

Workflow

Before editing:

  1. Recover the current Task Brief and stop condition.
  2. Identify the owning layer: rule, skill, project constraint, domain knowledge, source module, script, adapter, test, or documentation.
  3. Search existing code, tests, helpers, templates, scripts, and docs for reusable behavior before creating anything new.
  4. Decide whether the change should extend an existing owner, create a small new owner, or avoid code changes entirely.
  5. Check whether the placement preserves project structure, source-of-truth ownership, public contracts, configuration boundaries, and generated-template boundaries.
  6. Choose the smallest write set that can satisfy the result without scattering related behavior.
  7. Decide the verification evidence before editing.

Engineering Planning Card

For non-trivial implementation or fix work, keep this compact card in working notes or the user-facing plan:

| Item | Decision |
| --- | --- |
| Owner | Existing module/file/layer that should own the change |
| Reuse | Existing code, helper, pattern, test, or doc to reuse |
| Placement | Where the change belongs and why |
| Write set | Files/directories expected to change |
| Boundary | Public contract, config, template, adapter, security, or project boundary to preserve |
| Verification | Tests/checks that prove the result |

Skip the visible card only for tiny local edits where owner, reuse, placement, and verification are obvious.

Guardrails

  1. Do not create a new file until checking whether an existing owner should be extended.
  2. Do not put reusable protocol behavior into project-specific docs.
  3. Do not put project-specific constraints into reusable Agent Feed rules or skills.
  4. Do not duplicate adapter-specific behavior when a canonical source can generate it.
  5. Do not introduce a helper, abstraction, dependency, or directory only to make the current patch look organized.
  6. If placement or ownership is unclear and the decision affects future maintenance, apply .agents/rules/decision-gates.md before editing.

Output

After using this skill, the AI should be able to state:

  1. Where the work belongs.
  2. What existing behavior is reused.
  3. Why the write set is maintainable.
  4. What verification proves the integration.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.