seo-project-setup
Skill4 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Populate a project's shared OpenSEO context — site scope, goals, positioning, competitors, key pages, and preferences — plus MCP checks and Search Console intake.
10 other projects use a version of this, 9 of them edited; 1 new project in the last 4 weeks, against 1 the 4 before.
Adopted by
Steady: 1 new project took it in the last 4 weeks, 1× the 4 weeks before.thin data
Most recently taken up by
- winsley-jeune/harborrank-skillsedited, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- jwuthri-cloud/Tracely-aiedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- petera2c/simple-tableedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- VladSez/easy-invoice-pdfedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- every-app/open-seoword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- kid7st/agenticseoedited, first seen Sep 25, 2026
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- every-app/open-seo★ 27k100% same
Edited · 9
- Jwuthri/Tracely-ai★ 1.3k68% same
- VladSez/easy-invoice-pdf★ 1.1k66% same
- jwuthri-cloud/Tracely-ai★ 97968% same
- petera2c/simple-table★ 23366% same
- kid7st/agenticseo★ 250% same
- ventra-rocket/EchoSEO★ 265% same
- winsley-jeune/harborrank-skills★ 229% same
- ictlondon/kraftskills★ 095% same
- IsaacBell/ai-marketing-toolkit★ 068% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-prompt-researchSkill
- ai-visibility-auditSkill
- competitive-landscapeSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- create-repo-skillSkill
- deslopSkill
- evaluate-skillSkill
- keyword-clusteringSkill
- keyword-researchSkill
- link-prospectingSkill
- local-seoSkill
- merge-readySkill
- observability-triageSkill
- openseo-release-notesSkill
- openseo-review-web-contentSkill
- papercutsSkill
- review-briefSkill
- review-simplifySkill
- review-ui-statesSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- seo-coachSkill
- seo-reportSkill
- setup-openseoSkill
- simple-issue-descriptionSkill
- stageshowSkill
- test-auditSkill
- verify-local-mcpSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
27 rules. 11 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.
11
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
11
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
Write in batches as the interview progresses — do not hold every answer until the end.
- Very specific: line 36
Use whoami if available.
- Very specific: line 37
Use list_projects to confirm the user can access projects.
- Common: line 39
If the project list is ambiguous, ask the user which project should be used.
- Very specific: line 40
If no project matches, offer to create one with create_project.
- Distinctive: line 41
If the MCP is unavailable, tell the user to connect OpenSEO MCP.
- Very specific: line 43
Do not run research tools just to test connectivity.
- Very specific: line 47
Call get_project_context. Show the user a short summary of what OpenSEO already knows and what is missing.
- Very specific: line 60
Write the durable parts to business_overview: what the business does, who it is for, the target markets/locales, and the site's current …
- Common: line 64
Ask the user what they want from SEO:
- Common: line 74
Ask for success metrics and timeframe.
- Very specific: line 76
Write the result to current_goal, including the metric and timeframe.
- Common: line 80
Ask what research they have already done about the company, product, audience, and competitors.
- Common: line 93
If the user has not done this yet, offer to help research positioning using the company website, competitor pages, reviews, forums, and web …
- Very specific: line 95
Write to positioning: audience, the problem, the differentiator, and any claims the user wants defended.
- Common: line 105
Ask for or discover:
- Common: line 123
Fallback (self-hosted, or if the user prefers files): ask the user to export CSVs from Search Console into a local working folder (see step …
- Very specific: line 132
Ask them to drop files into gsc/ and use names like:
- Very specific: line 145
If the user wants one, suggest ~/SEO/<company-or-site>/ or a folder beside the website/content repo, with a structure like:
- Distinctive: line 154
Do not create folders unless the user asks, and do not duplicate goals, positioning, or competitors into a local file — that is what the …
- Common: line 158
After intake, recommend one next OpenSEO workflow:
- Common: line 169
Use a checklist with statuses:
- Distinctive: line 182
Search Console status and any local files
- Common: line 190
Keep setup lightweight. The user should feel oriented, not assigned homework.
- Very specific: line 192
Do not pretend a GSC CSV has been uploaded unless you can see it, and do not claim Search Console is connected unless …
- Distinctive: line 193
Keep project setup focused on setup and context unless the user asks for live research.
- Common: line 194
If web search or scraping is used for positioning research, distinguish source evidence from inference.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
OpenSEO SEO Project Setup
Goal
Interview the user once about one website or SEO project, and store the answers in that project's shared context in OpenSEO with update_project_context. That context is read by every other skill and by the user on the project's Context page (in the sidebar under AI) — so it survives new sessions, new machines, and new agents. This is a context setup workflow, not a full audit.
Tone
Be friendly, practical, and structured. Ask questions in small batches. Explain why each item matters only when useful. Do not overwhelm a beginner with jargon.
Where the answers go
Two project-context MCP tools do all the writing. Both are free — they spend no credits.
get_project_context(projectId): everything already known about the project, plus amissingSectionslist.update_project_context(projectId, updates): a list of patch ops. The ones this skill uses:{ section: "business_overview" | "current_goal" | "positioning" | "writing_preferences", content }{ addCompetitors: [{ domain, name?, notes? }] }{ addKeyPages: [{ url, role: "hub" | "spoke" | "money" | "other", topic?, notes? }] }{ customSection: "<slug>", title?, content }for anything that does not fit a typed section{ appendResearchLog: { summary } }when this session spends credits
Write in batches as the interview progresses — do not hold every answer until the end. Sections are prose (~4,000 characters each), so a few tight paragraphs, not a transcript.
Checklist
1. Verify OpenSEO MCP and resolve the project
Writes need a projectId, so do this first:
- Use
whoamiif available. - Use
list_projectsto confirm the user can access projects. - Match the project to the website/domain they want to rank for.
- If the project list is ambiguous, ask the user which project should be used.
- If no project matches, offer to create one with
create_project. - If the MCP is unavailable, tell the user to connect OpenSEO MCP; without it, nothing can be saved.
Do not run research tools just to test connectivity; whoami and list_projects are enough.
2. Read what is already there
Call get_project_context. Show the user a short summary of what OpenSEO already knows and what is missing. Confirm or correct existing entries rather than re-asking questions that are already answered — this skill is often re-run after another skill filled in part of the context.
3. Collect website scope
Ask for:
- Primary website/domain
- Additional domains or subdomains
- Important products, services, categories, or pages
- Target countries/languages
- Whether the site is new, established, migrating, or recovering from a drop
- CMS or publishing workflow, if relevant
Write the durable parts to business_overview: what the business does, who it is for, the target markets/locales, and the site's current stage.
4. Capture goals
Ask the user what they want from SEO:
- More qualified leads
- More signups/trials
- More ecommerce revenue
- More newsletter/audience growth
- More brand/category awareness
- Recovery from traffic loss
- Better ranking for specific pages
Ask for success metrics and timeframe. If goals are vague, help turn them into measurable goals such as "increase non-branded organic signups" or "rank top 10 for 20 buying-intent terms."
Write the result to current_goal, including the metric and timeframe.
5. Capture positioning and strategy context
Ask what research they have already done about the company, product, audience, and competitors. Request any notes, docs, customer interviews, positioning docs, pitch decks, landing pages, or strategy memos they can share.
Probe for:
- Who the product or site is for
- What pain it solves
- Why users choose it over alternatives
- Competitors and substitutes
- Strong opinions or positioning claims
- Best customers and bad-fit customers
- Existing content that already converts
- Topics they do not want to target
If the user has not done this yet, offer to help research positioning using the company website, competitor pages, reviews, forums, and web search.
Write to positioning: audience, the problem, the differentiator, and any claims the user wants defended. Ask about voice, banned words or phrases, and topics to avoid, and write those to writing_preferences — content-drafting workflows read that section.
6. Save competitors
Turn the competitors and substitutes from step 5 into addCompetitors entries: one row per domain, with a short notes line on why they matter ("direct competitor, owns the comparison pages"). If the user is unsure who competes in search, find_serp_competitors on a handful of seed keywords will name them — confirm the list with the user before saving, and log the spend.
Competitors saved here are reused by competitive-landscape, competitor-analysis, and link-prospecting.
7. Inventory key assets
Ask for or discover:
- Sitemap or important URL list
- Current blog/resources/content library
- Product/category/feature pages
- Existing keyword lists
- Current rank trackers
- Backlink or PR assets
- Linkable assets such as studies, templates, tools, datasets, calculators, or original opinions
Save the pages that actually matter with addKeyPages — money pages, topic hubs, and the linkable assets. This is a curated shortlist, not a site inventory: 10 to 30 URLs is normal. Give each one a role and, where known, the topic it targets.
8. Connect Google Search Console
GSC is the richest first-party signal: existing impressions, near-ranking terms, cannibalization, and pages that already have search demand.
Preferred (hosted): connect it natively. On the project's Integrations page, connect Google Search Console and pull live data with get_search_console_performance. If the user has already connected a Google account there, you can pick the property yourself: list_search_console_sites shows what each connected account can see, and set_search_console_site binds one to the project (list_google_analytics_properties / set_google_analytics_property do the same for GA4). Once connected, the agent reads it directly in keyword-research and keyword-clustering — no manual files to maintain.
Fallback (self-hosted, or if the user prefers files): ask the user to export CSVs from Search Console into a local working folder (see step 9).
Recommended exports:
- Queries: last 3 months and last 16 months if available
- Pages: last 3 months and last 16 months if available
- Query + page combinations when possible
- Countries/devices if relevant
Ask them to drop files into gsc/ and use names like:
gsc/queries-last-3-months.csv
gsc/pages-last-3-months.csv
gsc/queries-last-16-months.csv
gsc/pages-last-16-months.csv9. Set up a local folder only for file work
Project knowledge lives in OpenSEO, not on disk. A local folder is still useful for the things that are actually files: GSC CSV exports, crawls, drafts, briefs, and reports.
If the user wants one, suggest ~/SEO/<company-or-site>/ or a folder beside the website/content repo, with a structure like:
seo-workspace/
gsc/
drafts/
reports/Do not create folders unless the user asks, and do not duplicate goals, positioning, or competitors into a local file — that is what the project context is for.
10. Recommend first workflow
After intake, recommend one next OpenSEO workflow:
seo-audit: when the site already exists and the user wants to know what to fix or do first, especially if they are new to SEOkeyword-research: when the user needs ideas from seed topicskeyword-clustering: when they have keywords or GSC data to map to pagescompetitive-landscape: when the market is unclearcompetitor-analysis: when they know a competitor to studylink-prospecting: when they have a linkable asset or target page
Output format
Use a checklist with statuses:
| Step | Status | Notes | Next action |
Then summarize:
- OpenSEO MCP/project status
- Sites in scope
- Goals
- Known positioning
- Competitors saved
- Key pages saved
- Search Console status and any local files
- Sections still missing from project context
- Recommended next workflow
Tell the user they can read and edit everything saved here on the project's Context page, in the sidebar under AI.
Guardrails
- Keep setup lightweight. The user should feel oriented, not assigned homework.
- Confirm facts with the user before writing them. Inferences from the site are fine to propose, but they get saved as agreed answers, not guesses.
- Do not pretend a GSC CSV has been uploaded unless you can see it, and do not claim Search Console is connected unless
get_search_console_performanceconfirms it (it returns a "not connected" message otherwise). - Keep project setup focused on setup and context unless the user asks for live research. If a step does spend credits, append a research log entry so other skills do not re-buy it.
- If web search or scraping is used for positioning research, distinguish source evidence from inference.
- Overwriting a section replaces it. When context already exists, merge the new answers into the existing prose instead of discarding it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

