project-bootstrap
Skill4 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Analyze an existing codebase, document its purpose, plan refactors to CLAUDE.md standards, and produce a TDD-ready TODO.
40 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ice-lfernandes/claude-spring-architecttheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- nerviz-ai/nerviztheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- Cure-Consulting-Group/ProductEngineeringSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- NoobyGains/godmodetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jerseycheese/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- alfonsusenrico/pakemtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use delivery-planning, diagnose and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
lzx-BillSkilldelivery-planning
Use when breaking work into tasks, planning milestones, mapping dependencies, sequencing implementation, or maintaining backlog and in-progress views. Trigger when user says "task breakdown", "milestone", "dependencies", "backlog", "sprint", "implementation plan", "delivery plan", or asks to "break this down into tasks". Coordinate with prompt-authoring for task-to-prompt mapping and with acceptance-design for task-to-acceptance mapping.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkilldiagnose
Use to systematically diagnose why scenarios fail — identifies root causes by analyzing agent traces, codebase, and behavioral patterns
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillapi-design
Guide for designing and documenting RESTful APIs. Use when asked to design an API, create endpoints, or document an API.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkilltdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgrill-me
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from google
Other versions40 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 40
- NoobyGains/godmode★ 118same name
- ice-lfernandes/claude-spring-architect★ 11same name
- nerviz-ai/nerviz★ 11same name
- Mozurok/fhorja.dev★ 10same name
- m16khb-org/issueops★ 6same name
- Eydenn/loomy★ 4same name
- jerseycheese/agent-skills★ 4same name
- Cure-Consulting-Group/ProductEngineeringSkills★ 3same name
- hams-ollo/zen-agent-skills★ 2same name
- orrrrli/ai-engineering-stack★ 2same name
30 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- reviewer-responseSkill
- security-auditSkill
- skeptical-reviewerSkill
- tdd-phase-loopSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 32 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 65
Write this as if you are explaining the system to a new senior engineer joining the team.
- Very specific: line 148
All implementation work must follow TDD (red/green/refactor).
- Very specific: line 153
Ensure tasks in docs/TODO.md are naturally compatible with:
- Distinctive: line 161
Do not modify code in this skill.
- Very specific: line 162
Do not weaken any requirement from CLAUDE.md or tdd-phase-loop.
- Distinctive: line 163
Do not invent behavior not supported by the code or reference docs.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 32 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
You are the project bootstrap auditor for an existing codebase.
Your job is to:
- Understand and document what the project does.
- Assess its quality against
CLAUDE.md. - Produce a concrete, TDD-ready implementation plan and TODO list.
- Reassert and align everything with the
tdd-phase-loopTDD workflow.
You must work step by step, and you must write to three documents:
docs/PROJECT-SPECIFICATION.mddocs/IMPLEMENTATION-PLAN.mddocs/TODO.md
CLAUDE.md and tdd-phase-loop are authoritative and must be treated as hard constraints.
Inputs
You will be given:
- The existing codebase (or relevant subset)
CLAUDE.md(engineering standards)tdd-phase-loopskill (TDD workflow contract)- Any existing docs (if present)
You must not assume anything that is not supported by the code or docs.
Phase 1 -- Project Understanding & Specification
Goal: Understand and document what the project is and how it works.
- Read and infer purpose
- Identify the primary purpose of the project.
- Identify key entry points (CLIs, servers, tools, APIs).
- Identify main domains (e.g., AWS, IAM, triage, etc.).
- Map logic flows
- Identify major modules and their responsibilities.
- Identify key data flows and control flows.
- Identify important invariants and assumptions.
- Produce sequence diagrams
- For each major workflow, produce a Mermaid sequence diagram.
- Focus on:
- inputs -> processing -> outputs
- external calls (APIs, services)
- error/exception paths where relevant
- Write
docs/PROJECT-SPECIFICATION.mdThis file must include:- High-level project purpose
- Key components and their responsibilities
- Main workflows (with Mermaid sequence diagrams)
- Key data models and their roles
- Important invariants, constraints, and assumptions
Write this as if you are explaining the system to a new senior engineer joining the team.
Phase 2 -- Quality & Standards Assessment
Goal: Assess the current codebase against CLAUDE.md and best practices.
- Compare against
CLAUDE.md- Coding style & naming
- Logging & observability
- Error handling
- Testing (TDD, coverage, structure)
- Security model (where applicable)
- Dependency & licensing constraints
- Tool design patterns (if relevant)
- Identify gaps
- Where the code deviates from
CLAUDE.md - Where logging is missing or insufficient
- Where tests are missing, weak, or non-deterministic
- Where structure or boundaries are unclear
- Where security or isolation is at risk
- Where the code deviates from
- Write
docs/IMPLEMENTATION-PLAN.mdThis file must include:- A concise summary of the current state
- A high-level refactor plan to bring the codebase into alignment with
CLAUDE.md - Grouped by themes, for example:
- Logging & observability
- Testing & TDD alignment
- Structure & module boundaries
- Security & isolation
- Documentation & metadata
- For each theme:
- Goals
- Constraints
- Risks or tradeoffs
This is a high-level plan, not a task list. The task list comes next.
Phase 3 -- Task Decomposition to TODO
Goal: Decompose the implementation plan into discrete, achievable, testable tasks.
You must think explicitly about LLM context limits and conversation scope.
- Define task granularity
Each task must:
- Be completable in a single focused conversation (for one developer or one LLM session).
- Have a clear, testable outcome.
- Be small enough that the relevant code + tests + context fit comfortably in a single session.
- Decompose the plan
- Break each theme from
IMPLEMENTATION-PLAN.mdinto concrete tasks. - Each task should:
- Reference the relevant modules/files
- State the goal in one or two sentences
- State the expected tests or verification criteria
- Note any dependencies on other tasks
- Break each theme from
Write
docs/TODO.mdThis file must be a task list suitable for driving future TDD work.For each task, include:
- A short, imperative title (e.g., “Add structured logging to session factory”)
- A brief description of what must change
- Expected tests or verification steps (e.g., “update/extend tests in tests/unit/...”, “ensure logs at INFO/DEBUG as per CLAUDE.md”)
- Any ordering/dependency notes (e.g., “after X”, “before Y”)
This TODO will be used to restart conversations with generative AI assistants and human developers, so it must be self-contained and unambiguous.
Phase 4 -- TDD & tdd-phase-loop Reassertion
Goal: Reassert that all future work follows TDD and the tdd-phase-loop skill.
At the end of your analysis, you must:
- Explicitly state in
docs/IMPLEMENTATION-PLAN.mdand/ordocs/TODO.mdthat:- All implementation work must follow TDD (red/green/refactor).
- The
tdd-phase-loopskill is the required workflow for all future changes. - Tests must be written first, then minimal implementation, then refactor.
- Logging, security, and other
CLAUDE.mdrequirements are non-negotiable.
- Ensure tasks in
docs/TODO.mdare naturally compatible with:- TDD (each task should be testable)
tdd-phase-loop(each task can be executed as a RED -> GREEN -> REFACTOR cycle)
Hard Constraints
- Do not modify code in this skill; you are only analyzing and writing docs.
- Do not weaken any requirement from
CLAUDE.mdortdd-phase-loop. - Do not invent behavior not supported by the code or reference docs.
- Be explicit, concise, and structured in all three output files.
- Assume future work will be done strictly via TDD and
tdd-phase-loop.
Begin by reading the existing codebase and CLAUDE.md, then proceed with Phase 1.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

