process
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run the whole Loom pipeline over all new recordings - fetch, analyze, publish, and mark each. This is the unit the background scheduler runs.
- Reads credentials
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ddehart/claude-code-pluginstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- notque/vexjoy-agenttheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- BrendenKennedy/claude-for-ai-platformstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- notque/claude-code-toolkittheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- me2resh/apexyardtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- Consortium-team/project-creatortheir own version, first seen Sep 10, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use kubernetes, testing and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
mjunaidcaSkillkubernetes
Production-grade Kubernetes manifests and debugging for containerized applications. This skill should be used when users ask to deploy to Kubernetes, create K8s manifests, containerize for K8s, set up Deployments/Services/Jobs/StatefulSets/CronJobs, create namespaces with resource quotas, set up multi-team isolation, configure ResourceQuota/ LimitRange, secure with RBAC (ServiceAccount, Role, RoleBinding), configure init containers (model download, db wait, migrations), set up sidecars (logging, metrics), or debug pods (CrashLoopBackOff, logs, exec, describe, events). Auto-detects from Dockerfile/code, generates hardened manifests with educational comments. CKAD-aligned.
Also in 3 projects that use this
NVIDIASkilltesting
Run Python and Rust tests for physicsnemo-curator using uv + pytest with coverage reporting via pytest-cov, and cargo-nextest for Rust tests. Includes benchmark workflows with pytest-benchmark and criterion.
Also in 3 projects that use this
NVIDIASkillresearch
Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- notque/claude-code-toolkit★ 448same name
- notque/vexjoy-agent★ 448same name
- tuan3w/obsidian-vault-agent★ 39same name
- Consortium-team/project-creator★ 17same name
- BrendenKennedy/claude-for-ai-platforms★ 1same name
- ddehart/claude-code-plugins★ 1same name
- chris-santiago/ml-wiki★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 19
Read artifacts/recordings.json and the ledger state/ledger.json (treat a missing ledger as an empty list).
- Very specific: line 32
If it is EMPTY, skip publishing this recording and do NOT mark it - report that no Notion destination is cached (the user must run …
- Distinctive: line 40
If the create-pages call did not return a page URL, the publish did not happen - do NOT record it and do NOT mark.
- Very specific: line 43
If EMPTY, skip task creation (report once for the run.
- Distinctive: line 49
If the Todoist MCP is unavailable or returns no task id, do NOT record and continue.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Analysis contract (rules + output schema) for this run:
!cd "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}" && npx tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env scripts/print-analyze-contract.ts
Process all new recordings. Publish for real only when $ARGUMENTS contains --commit; otherwise
do a dry run (analyze and report, but do not publish or mark).
- List recordings to a file (pass through
--days Nif present):cd "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}" && npx tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env scripts/list.ts --json $ARGUMENTS - Read
artifacts/recordings.jsonand the ledgerstate/ledger.json(treat a missing ledger as an empty list). The NEW recordings are those that arecompleteand whoseidis not in the ledger, regardless of who recorded them - the listing includes meetings recorded by teammates, withrecorderNameidentifying the recorder. - For each NEW recording id, in order, isolating failures (a bad recording must not stop the rest):
a.
npx tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env scripts/download.ts <id>b. Readartifacts/<id>.transcript.json+artifacts/<id>.meta.json, produce the action-plan JSON per the contract above (stamp recordingId/recordingName/recordingDate/recorderName from meta; recorderName is null when meta has none), writeartifacts/<id>.plan.json. c.npx tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env scripts/validate-plan.ts <id>(fix and re-write on failure). d. If--commit:- Notion: read the cached destination
npx tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env scripts/config-get.ts notion.databaseId. If it is EMPTY, skip publishing this recording and do NOT mark it - report that no Notion destination is cached (the user must run/loom-daddy:publishonce interactively to set it). If present, create the page via the available Notion MCP create-pages tool, using the same layout as the publish skill (title, aRecorded by: <recorderName>paragraph first when the plan has a non-nullrecorderName, Summary, Decisions with?t=links, Action Items table, Open Questions). - Record the confirmed Notion publish using the page URL the create-pages tool returned:
npx tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env scripts/record-publish.ts <id> --url <pageUrl>. If the create-pages call did not return a page URL, the publish did not happen - do NOT record it and do NOT mark; leave the recording for the next run. - Todoist: read
npx tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env scripts/config-get.ts todoist.projectId. If EMPTY, skip task creation (report once for the run; the user configures it via/loom-daddy:publishinteractively). Otherwise runnpx tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env scripts/todoist-payload.ts <id>; if the JSON has"skip": true, continue. Else create the parent task then the subtasks via the Todoist MCP add-tasks tool (subtasks useparentId= the parent task id), and record withnpx tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env scripts/record-todoist.ts <id> --task-id <parentId> --count <n>. If the Todoist MCP is unavailable or returns no task id, do NOT record and continue; list the recording as "tasks unsent" in the summary. Todoist never blocks Drive or marking. - Drive:
npx tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env scripts/publish.ts <id> --drive-only --commit(skips itself when Drive is not configured). - Then
npx tsx --env-file-if-exists=.env scripts/mark.ts <id>. mark.ts refuses to mark unless the Notion publish receipt from the previous step exists, so a missing or failed Notion publish leaves the recording unmarked for retry.
- Notion: read the cached destination
- Report a per-recording summary: processed, skipped (already in ledger or no Notion destination), failed ids, and any recordings whose Todoist tasks are unsent.
Note: this skill is model-invocable so the local scheduler can trigger it headlessly via
claude -p. A headless run reaches the claude.ai Notion MCP (verified), so publishing uses the
MCP in both the interactive and scheduled paths. Do not advance any time watermark beyond what the
scripts already persist.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

