flow
Skill2 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub
Harmonia flow - run a pinned task through plan, implement, and review in one unattended pass, stopping at human acceptance. Use ONLY when explicitly invoked as /harmonia:flow.
33 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- phuthuycoding/kanban-flowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- baodhg/FLOWtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jocarrd/crux-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- cofin/flowtheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- retospect/precis-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- luckys/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use grill, ship and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
renatorozasSkillgrill
Adversarial code review. Don't let me ship until the changes pass your scrutiny.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AWSSkillship
Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkilltdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions33 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 33
- react/react★ 252ksame name
- facebook/react★ 252ksame name
- software-mansion/react-native-audio-api★ 856same name
- simota/agent-skills★ 96same name
- panayiotism/claude-harness★ 79same name
- rainday/smart-blog-skills★ 35same name
- cofin/flow★ 19same name
- basezh/agent-skills-on-base★ 15same name
- retospect/precis-mcp★ 11same name
- foryouself83/harness-tier★ 10same name
23 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Files
Your working contract is the rules; their digest is injected at session start - read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/core/RULES.md in full only if that digest is not in your context.
Read the plan, implement, and review stages from ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/core/lifecycle.yaml - their artifacts and gates are authoritative and define the transitions below; do not hardcode them. This runner is a meta-command, not a lifecycle stage: it holds no stage logic of its own and hardcodes no agent list. Each stage's own SKILL.md owns its orchestration - agents, the red-green loop, the panel, the gates - so execute those procedures and never restate them.
Span: plan, then implement, then review, in one unattended session. Discuss stays manual because it is dialogic - the scoper and rubber-duck question the developer, so it cannot run unattended - and acceptance stays manual under the human-only gate. The runner chains neither.
- Entry gate - require a pinned scope that carries criteria:
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/workspace.sh resolve --repo .to locate the active workspace (never mint; on ambiguity or no-active-task, surface the script's message and stop). If the resolved workspace has noscope.md, refuse and point the developer to/harmonia:discuss- the runner starts from an already-pinned scope and never mints or auto-scopes. Withscope.mdpresent, gate its criteria before any work: runbash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/check-criteria.sh --workspace <resolved-workspace> --repo .and halt on a non-zero exit - a criteria-less or non-machine-checkable scope is refused up front and pointed to/harmonia:discuss, the same refusal as the no-scope path (the check writes a status-validatedreceipts/check-criteria.json; the implement gate re-runs it, redundant but harmless). With scope and criteria confirmed, clear this run's stale prior-run output before any transition runs by callingbash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/workspace.sh clear-span --repo .; the subcommand names the span out-artifacts and confines the removal to the resolved workspace, so this runner does not restate that file list (it lives inbin/workspace.sh).scope.mdis the pinned input and is never removed. - Plan: execute the plan stage per
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/plan/SKILL.md. Scope is present, so the scoper consumes and refines it and never re-mints. Before advancing, confirm the plan stage wrote itsdesign.mdout-artifact to the workspace; if it did not, halt and hand back. - Implement: execute the implement stage per
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/implement/SKILL.md. Its pre-implement gate runscheck-criteria. Inspect that gate's signal directly: halt whenreceipts/check-criteria.jsonrecords astatusother thanpass, or whencheck-criteriaexits non-zero. On that signal the criteria are not machine-checkable, so implement writes no code - a stop before any work begins, unlike the review halt in step 5 which stops after the work withverdict.mdalready on disk. Halt and hand back with the failing-criteria report and its receipt (receipts/check-criteria.json); do not advance. - Advance to review - unconditional: once the implement stage has written its
boundary.mdanddiff-summary.mdout-artifacts, advance to review whether the red-green loop completed or exited incomplete at itsmax_roundscap. The cap is not a gate failure; the loop records the disagreement in the workspace for the review lead to arbitrate. - Review: execute the review stage per
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/review/SKILL.md. Take itsverdict.mdas authoritative. Halt on a failing review gate: if the verdict is not a pass because a criteria-run or receipts gate failed, or because a test-immutability violation was recorded, stop and hand back withverdict.mdon disk. Never override the lead's verdict. - Stop before capture - hand back: the runner ends after review. It never writes the
acceptedmarker and never runsbash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/workspace.sh accept- acceptance is a human act. Never run accept on the developer's behalf. Hand back a summary telling the developer to exercise the built behavior, record acceptance via/harmonia:accept, then invoke/harmonia:captureas a separate manual act. The runner never enters capture.
Pass workspace paths, not prose recaps. Orchestrate only.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

