agentleFS
flurdyflurdy/agent-skills/skills/handoffs-tidy/SKILL.md

handoffs-tidy

Skill9 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Review handoffs for confirmed archiving: superseded, done or stale candidates, plus separate assisted review of old/uncertain rows. Age alone never proves completion. Archives files, never deletes or resumes work.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 10

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Keep ~/.agents/handoffs/ focused through four review groups.

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    14 days: after both handoff creation and verified completion, or while completion timing is unknown.

    line 26
  3. Very specific:

    Run it ad-hoc whenever the picker feels noisy, or right after a /wrap-up.

    line 30
  4. Very specific:

    After a /wrap-up whose handoff continued an earlier thread, or whose work has now shipped.

    line 42
  5. Distinctive:

    Not needed if you keep only one live handoff per topic and archive as you go.

    line 44
  6. Distinctive:

    Every candidate preview in steps 4–5e is mandatory visible Markdown before its archive or assisted-review question, per REFERENCE §Prompt …

    line 48
  7. Distinctive:

    Follow REFERENCE §Jira-Done for qualifying current-repo and workspace-member rows that name Jira tickets.

    line 95
  8. Distinctive:

    Use its shared retention helper and clear both assisted flags on every Done row, even when retained.

    line 96
  9. Very specific:

    If current_repo_superseded == 0 and current_repo_stale == 0 and §Jira-Done promoted no older row to safe and no current-repo row has …

    line 103
  10. Distinctive:

    If there are auto-classified candidates, render them as a table, grouped by regret (REFERENCE §Archive-flow defines the groups).

    line 118
  11. Very specific:

    Run the archive flow exactly as REFERENCE §Archive-flow specifies: prompt with AskUserQuestion (multiSelect, one option per candidate, …

    line 139
  12. Very specific:

    If any current-repo row has needs-review=Y, run the assisted prompt per REFERENCE §Trunk-review — a separate, clearly-labelled prompt (not …

    line 151
  13. Very specific:

    If any current-repo row still has needs-age-review=Y after §Jira-Done promotion, run the assisted prompt exactly as REFERENCE §Age-review …

    line 161
  14. Distinctive:

    Run the member archive flow exactly as REFERENCE §Archive-flow-members specifies, after the current-repo steps.

    line 168
  15. Very specific:

    Read the member rows from ---WORKSPACE-MEMBER-HANDOFFS--- (26 fields: the usual 24 plus {member-display}|{member-path}) and the per-repo …

    line 172
  16. Very specific:

    If any workspace-member row still has needs-age-review=Y after step 3, run the separate assisted prompt exactly as

    line 192
  17. Distinctive:

    If nothing was archivable or reviewable (steps 4–5e), or the user selected none, say so plainly and stop.

    line 199

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Handoffs-tidy — retire handoffs that no longer point at live work

Keep ~/.agents/handoffs/ focused through four review groups. Only the first three have completion/staleness evidence; the fourth is explicitly uncertain:

  • Superseded — a newer handoff continues the same thread (same branch / topic / same-day re-wrap).
  • Done — the work shipped: its PR merged, every referenced bead is closed, the branch landed, or its Jira ticket is Done. These are usually never re-wrapped, so nothing supersedes them — they just sit in the picker looking 🟢 live until you notice the work is long gone.
  • Stale — abandoned: the PR was closed unmerged, or the branch is gone with no merge evidence.
  • Old and signal-less — unknown branch liveness with no usable PR signal or resolvable beads. Age only earns an assisted question; it never makes the handoff an automatic archive candidate.

This command finds all four and archives the ones you confirm. Completed context is retained for 14 days after both handoff creation and verified completion, or while completion timing is unknown; superseded rows are the sole immediate exception. Nothing is deleted — archived files move to ~/.agents/handoffs/archive/ and stay greppable.

Run it ad-hoc whenever the picker feels noisy, or right after a /wrap-up. It is the standalone twin of /handoffs's opt-in archive step (§3b): same list.sh classification, same archive flow — shared verbatim via REFERENCE.md — but with no full table, no picker, and no resume step. It only ever archives explicit selections. Automatic candidate groups exclude live/unknown rows; §Trunk-review and §Age-review separately allow assisted judgement of uncertain rows, never by age alone.

Earlier versions only found superseded handoffs (it ran list.sh with no flags and looked at one field). That's why it rarely found anything — supersede is the narrowest signal. From v0.2.0 it runs the full liveness pass, so finished-but-never-re-wrapped handoffs finally surface.

When to use

  • After a /wrap-up whose handoff continued an earlier thread, or whose work has now shipped.
  • Periodically, when /handoffs shows entries you've moved past — merged PRs, closed beads, dead branches.
  • Not needed if you keep only one live handoff per topic and archive as you go.

Output contract — preview before confirmation

Every candidate preview in steps 4–5e is mandatory visible Markdown before its archive or assisted-review question, per REFERENCE §Prompt boundaries. Never substitute a prose summary or collapsed helper output for the table. Send it before calling AskUserQuestion, not after the answer. This applies even when only assisted or workspace-member candidates exist and step 4 skips directly to their flow; it does not require /handoffs's full inventory or picker.

Instructions

MUST use the helper scripts. Never construct ad-hoc ls/grep/git/gh/bd pipelines against ~/.agents/handoffs/ — they bypass the per-script permission allowlist and miss the repo-matching and liveness logic. Classification and the archive flow are specified once in ~/.agents/skills/handoffs/REFERENCE.md; read it rather than re-deriving the rules here, including §Age-review for old rows with no usable signals.

1. Load the shared spec

Read ~/.agents/skills/handoffs/REFERENCE.md. It defines how to read list.sh's output, classify each row, and run the archive flow — the same definitions /handoffs uses, so the two never drift.

2. Run the lister with liveness

~/.agents/skills/handoffs/scripts/list.sh --check-branches [--retention-days N] [--stale-days N]

Forward supplied retention/stale flags. Follow REFERENCE §Retention: 14 days by default, inclusive UTC boundary, with unknown completion dates retained and no assisted-review bypass. The age-review floor defaults/clamps to retention; recent-activity summaries remain independent.

Runtime: Bash, Git, standard Unix tools and GNU/BSD date, plus Python 3.10+ (standard library only). Missing Python or retention.py fails clearly; optional gh, bd, and Jira access degrade gracefully. Listing writes no retention state.

--check-branches is what makes this command capable: it fills branch-state and (when gh is present) pr-state, so the script can mark merged PRs, landed branches, and closed PRs. Bead-closure (beads-done, keyed off the **Deliverable:** field when present) and supersede are computed regardless. See REFERENCE §Run and §Fields for the flag semantics and the 24-field line format. Degrades cleanly offline (REFERENCE §Run / the failure modes below).

Parse the ---HANDOFFS--- lines and the ---SUMMARY--- counts. For each current-repo row, derive its Status (REFERENCE §Status) and archive-class (safe / keep / empty — REFERENCE §Fields). Also note current-repo rows with needs-review=Y (step 5b) and needs-age-review=Y (step 5c), plus workspace-member rows with needs-age-review=Y (step 5e). These are assisted judgement groups, never automatic archive candidates.

3. Resolve Jira-Done (optional)

Follow REFERENCE §Jira-Done for qualifying current-repo and workspace-member rows that name Jira tickets. Use its shared retention helper and clear both assisted flags on every Done row, even when retained. This catches handoffs whose only finished signal is a closed ticket (no merged PR, no closed beads). It's gated exactly as REFERENCE describes and degrades silently if the Jira MCP isn't configured — skip it freely if you want to stay network-light; PR/bead/branch/supersede classification still stands.

4. Present the candidates

If current_repo_superseded == 0 and current_repo_stale == 0 and §Jira-Done promoted no older row to safe and no current-repo row has needs-review=Y or needs-age-review=Y and no member row is archivable (step 5d's gate) or has needs-age-review=Y (step 5e), report nothing and stop at step 6 — the picker is already tidy:

_No archivable handoffs — remaining rows are live, unknown, or retained pending age/completion timing._

Check step 5d's gate before stopping. In a multi-repo workspace the current repo can be perfectly tidy while its members hold many finished handoffs — member rows deliberately never feed current_repo_stale. Stopping on the current-repo counts alone reports "nothing to tidy" while archivable handoffs sit one level away, which is precisely the blind spot this command exists to close. When only member candidates exist, skip to step 5d rather than stopping.

If there are auto-classified candidates, render them as a table, grouped by regret (REFERENCE §Archive-flow defines the groups). When only an assisted flag is present, skip straight to step 5b for current-repo needs-review, step 5c for current-repo needs-age-review, or step 5e for member needs-age-review.

## 🗂️ Archive candidates ({count})

| Archive? | Date | Slug | Branch | Status | Group |
|----------|------|------|--------|--------|-------|
  • Branch and Status: the row's branch and §Status glyph, capped per REFERENCE §Cells so the table stays within ~150 columns.
  • Group: Superseded / Done / Stale. A row that is both superseded and otherwise archivable goes in Superseded (the safest reason to archive). Order the table Superseded → Done → Stale.
  • Archive?: label safe as a recommendation and keep as requiring care, not selected choices. Stale rows may be the only record of an abandoned thread; confirmation follows the shared spec.

5. Confirm + archive

Run the archive flow exactly as REFERENCE §Archive-flow specifies: prompt with AskUserQuestion (multiSelect, one option per candidate, grouped and described per that section), then archive the selected filenames in one archive.sh call and parse ---ARCHIVED--- / ---SKIPPED---. Follow REFERENCE prompt bounds; leave all choices unselected. Surface every ---SKIPPED--- line verbatim with its reason. Never offer a 🟢 live, 🟠 PR open, or unknown row. archive.sh only moves — never deletes.

✅ Archived {N} handoff(s) to `~/.agents/handoffs/archive/`.

5b. Trunk handoffs worth a look (assisted)

If any current-repo row has needs-review=Y, run the assisted prompt per REFERENCE §Trunk-review — a separate, clearly-labelled prompt (not mixed into the step-5 groups) for legacy trunk-parked handoffs the script couldn't auto-classify: partial bead closure (beads-progress like 1/4), no **Deliverable:** marker, so it can't tell finished own-work from never-closing context. Present the {beads-progress} and bead list per row and let the user decide; archive any they confirm via the same archive.sh call. Skip entirely when no row is flagged. This prompt goes quiet on its own as old handoffs age out and new ones carry **Deliverable:**.

5c. 🕰️ Old handoffs with no completion signal

If any current-repo row still has needs-age-review=Y after §Jira-Done promotion, run the assisted prompt exactly as REFERENCE §Age-review specifies. Keep it separate from the safe/done/stale and §Trunk-review groups. Age is not evidence of doneness: leave every option unselected, make skipping trivial, and archive only filenames the user explicitly confirms. Skip when no row is flagged.

5d. 🧱 Workspace-member handoffs

Run the member archive flow exactly as REFERENCE §Archive-flow-members specifies, after the current-repo steps. In a multi-repo workspace, member repos are where finished handoffs accumulate — the root itself often holds one or two.

Read the member rows from ---WORKSPACE-MEMBER-HANDOFFS--- (26 fields: the usual 24 plus {member-display}|{member-path}) and the per-repo totals from ---WORKSPACE-MEMBER-REPOS---. Classify each with the same §Status / §Archive-glyph rules as current-repo rows — member rows are already classified against their own repo when --check-branches was passed.

Key points from that section, so they aren't missed:

  • Gate: --check-branches was passed, and at least one member row is archive-class=safe; retained non-superseded member rows (including unknown completion dates) have an empty class and are not offered here.
  • Only safe rows are offered from here. keep-class member rows (PR closed unmerged, branch gone with no merge evidence) are higher-regret — name them and point at cd {path} && /handoffs-tidy rather than offering them.
  • One question per member repo, not one per candidate — AskUserQuestion caps at 4 options and a single repo can hold more candidates than that.
  • Archive every selection across repos in one archive.sh call; it takes bare filenames and is repo-agnostic.

Skip the step entirely when the gate doesn't pass.

5e. 🕰️ Old workspace-member handoffs worth a look

If any workspace-member row still has needs-age-review=Y after step 3, run the separate assisted prompt exactly as REFERENCE §Age-review-members specifies. These old unknown rows are not safe member candidates: leave every option unselected, offer per-row choices grouped by member repo, and archive only explicit selections. Skip when no effective flags remain; raw counters may include retained Jira-Done rows.

6. Done

If nothing was archivable or reviewable (steps 4–5e), or the user selected none, say so plainly and stop. This command never executes the saved work or deletes files. Uncertain handoffs are archived only through the separate assisted confirmation; no selection means no mutation.

Failure modes

  • list.sh / archive.sh / REFERENCE.md missing (handoffs skill not installed): say so plainly and stop — this command is a thin driver over the handoffs skill's scripts and shared spec.
  • Neither handoff location exists: nothing to tidy; say so and stop.
  • ---STORAGE--- is legacy, mixed or partial: apply REFERENCE §Prompt boundaries' storage gate. Render the candidate groups once as a read-only preview (label each row's {source}), say archiving stays disabled until ~/.claude/handoffs is migrated or the unreadable location is fixed, and stop without any archive question or archive.sh call (it refuses while the legacy location exists). For partial, name the locations ---SOURCES--- reports as not readable.
  • Not in a git repo: liveness needs a repo to classify against — say so and stop. (cd into the repo and re-run.)
  • Multi-repo workspace: member repos are covered by step 5d for safe rows and step 5e for old signal-less rows. keep-class and partial-bead trunk-review rows still require cding into that member and re-running.
  • Offline / remote unreachable: branch-state degrades to local-only (merged still detected against the local default tip; no false gone). The Done/Stale groups just shrink. Don't retry.
  • gh missing, unauthenticated, or timed out: pr-state reports unknown and classification falls back to branch-state + beads-done. No error, no retry. Squash-merged branches may show as ⚪ branch gone (keep?) rather than ✅ merged (safe) unless a closed bead or Jira-Done marks them done.
  • bd missing or no .beads/: beads-done is always empty — finished work then relies on PR/branch/supersede (and §Jira-Done) signals alone.
  • Jira MCP missing or errors: step 3 is skipped silently; PR/bead/supersede classification stands.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.