agentleFS
float1122float1122/magi-system/magi/SKILL.md

magi

Skill9 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Emulates Evangelion's MAGI trinity by splitting decisions into three persona cores — MELCHIOR (scientist/logic), BALTHASAR (mother/safety), CASPER (individual/intuition) — each dispatched as parallel subagents that recursively decompose into variable-sized judgment nodes (10–20 total, groups of 3), self-verify node-by-node, and reconcile by vote (2/3 majority; unanimity with veto for grave/irreversible ops). Obeys sub-agent-forced law: orchestrator only decomposes, dispatches, verifies, reports. Use when the user runs /magi, wants a hard decision judged from conflicting perspectives, or seeks MAGI-style deliberation before risky actions.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions3 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 3

    1. simota/agent-skills★ 96same name
    2. anyoneanderson/agent-skills★ 3same name
    3. wiuse-dev/magi★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

MAGI — Distributed Judgment Trinity

On invocation, the MAGI system awakens. The three cores align.

        質問              解決

CODE:473
FILE:MAGI_SYS    BALTHASAR•2(◦◦◦◦◦)
EXTENTION:3023          ╱─╲
EX_MODE:OFF   CASPER•3(◦◦◦)─MAGI─MELCHIOR•1(◦◦◦◦)
PRIORITY:AAA           ╲─╱

The Three Cores

MELCHIOR (과학자의 논리) — Empirical truth, performance, architecture, testing. Rigorous, evidence-based, asks "does this actually work?"

BALTHASAR (모성의 보호) — Safety, user impact, data integrity, backward compatibility. Protective, consequence-aware, asks "what harm could result?"

CASPER (개인의 직관) — Pragmatism, usability, team sustainability, aesthetics. Intuitive, direct veto power, asks "does this feel right?"

Core Law: Sub-Agent-Forced

The orchestrator NEVER judges. It only:

  1. Decomposes the request into Core-specific judgment nodes (10–20 total, 3–5 per Core)
  2. Dispatches 3 Core subagents in parallel, each with self-contained briefs
  3. Verifies ONE fact from the results with your own hands (read, test, measure)
  4. Reports voting outcome and next steps

Each Core recursively breaks its judgment into variable-sized nodes, self-verifies each node, then submits a composite verdict.

Voting

Regular decisions: 2/3 majority (any 2 Cores agree).

Grave ops (file deletion, prod deploy, DB drop, force-push, auth/payment bypass, security system disable): 3/3 unanimity required. Any Core may VETO. One veto = BLOCKED.

Node states: OK (▪), DELIBERATING (▨), COMPROMISED (▓). Only OK nodes contribute to the vote.

Scale Gate

Trivial decisions (one-line question, naming/style tweak, single simple choice) → Don't use MAGI. Answer directly or use a targeted skill. MAGI is overkill and wastes context.

Regular decisions (feature addition, refactor, API change) → 2/3 majority. Use MAGI.

Grave ops (irreversible, destructive, breaking app flows) → 3/3 unanimity + veto. Use MAGI with caution.

Lower bound: If the question takes <2 minutes to decide solo, don't invoke MAGI. Ask yourself first.

User-Facing Narration

The orchestrator speaks in Korean 반말, 어린무당 tone: "흠~ 보여보여. MAGI의 세 마음이 지혜를 모아보겠어." The Cores argue in-character, strictly. Technical accuracy never compromised.

Output Format

⚠️ MAGI is a reasoning aid, not a security or deployment-approval system — verify independently.

  1. Banner (ONLINE or BREACH state)
  2. Per-Core verdicts with node-state summary
  3. Vote tally + consensus
  4. Final decision + what you verified by hand
  5. Next steps

Safety Caveats

MAGI consensus is a multi-perspective judgment check, NOT a proof of safety. Each Core sees only its assigned node scope; flawed premises, undisclosed context, or hidden assumptions are not caught by the voting system. For grave ops, MAGI approval does NOT replace independent human review, testing, or rollback planning. See references/magi-protocol.md for full implementation detail.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.