agentleFS
flakey-caster542flakey-caster542/superseo-skills/skills/linkbuilding/SKILL.md

linkbuilding

Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when planning link acquisition. Classifies the site's authority phase from site age and visible signals, then recommends phase-appropriate tactics from the bundled tactic playbook library. No backlink tool required.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the user specifies an action, adapt accordingly:

    line 16
  2. Very specific:

    Before giving execution instructions for any tactic, load its full playbook from references/tactics/<slug>.md.

    line 45
  3. Distinctive:

    If the user can share anchor text distribution (from any backlink tool), compare against safe ranges:

    line 70
  4. Very specific:

    If exact match > 5%: recommend branded/generic anchors for next 10-15 links before any outreach.

    line 77
  5. Distinctive:

    If they can't share this data, skip this step.

    line 79

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Link Building

A phase-appropriate link acquisition strategy with specific, executable tactics. The agent classifies your site's authority phase from what it can read (the domain, site age, what's on the homepage), then picks tactics from the 9 detailed playbooks in references/tactics/.

Input

Your domain or a URL (required). Optionally: your niche, what you sell, and any specific constraint ("I have no budget for outreach," "I already tried guest posting," etc.).

User context (optional)

If the user specifies an action, adapt accordingly:

  • "find easy link opportunities" → Focus on low-effort, high-conversion tactics: existing relationships, testimonials, citations, entity stacking
  • "help me with outreach" → Focus on outreach tactics: guest posting, resource pages. For each, provide search operators and pitch angles.
  • "create link-worthy content" → Focus on skyscraper content and statistics pages.
  • "plan a full strategy" → Run the full workflow below.

Role

You are a senior link building strategist with 10+ years building backlink profiles across new, growth, and authority-stage sites.

Step 1: Phase Assessment

Fetch the homepage of the domain. Google the brand name. From what you can see:

  • Site age — WHOIS or first Wayback Machine snapshot
  • Content volume — approximate pages indexed (site:domain.com)
  • Brand presence — does Google return a knowledge panel? A company card? Any news coverage?
  • Apparent size — solo / small team / established company

Classify the phase:

  • Foundation phase: new (< 1 year), thin content, no brand signals, likely DR 0-15
  • Growth phase: 1-3 years, 20-100 pages of content, some brand mentions, likely DR 16-40
  • Authority phase: 3+ years, established brand, knowledge panel, media mentions, likely DR 41+

State your reasoning. If the signals are ambiguous, load references/phase-classification-tree.md for the full decision tree before falling back on asking the user.

Step 2: Phase-Appropriate Tactics

Before giving execution instructions for any tactic, load its full playbook from references/tactics/<slug>.md. The 9 tactics bundled in this repo:

Foundation phase (do first)

  • Entity stacking (entity-stacking.md) — Consistent brand presence on 20+ platforms (Google Business, LinkedIn, Crunchbase, Medium, GitHub, Wikidata). Expected: 20-30 referring domains month 1. The Wikidata entry is highest-leverage for entity recognition.
  • Citations and directories (citations-directories.md) — Industry and local directories. Chamber of Commerce links are DR 50-70, dofollow.

Growth phase (next)

  • Competitor backlink gap (competitor-backlink-gap.md) — Requires a backlink tool (Ahrefs/Moz). Domains linking to 2+ competitors but not to you are 3x more likely to convert than cold targets.
  • Guest posting (guest-posting.md) — Target DR 30+ sites with real traffic. Contextual in-article links are worth 5-10x more than bio links.
  • Resource pages (resource-pages.md) — Search intitle:resources [niche]. University pages (DR 70-90+) are gold. Pitch as gap-filler.
  • Skyscraper technique (skyscraper-technique.md) — Find the most-linked content in your niche, create something 10x better, reach out to everyone who linked to the original.

Authority phase (scale)

  • Strategic partnerships (strategic-partnerships.md) — Joint research, co-authored guides, integration pages. Integration page links are permanent and high-authority.
  • Podcast guesting (podcast-guesting.md) — Target shows in your niche with 1,000-10,000 listeners (the sweet spot — not saturated, not tiny). Host links in show notes are dofollow and high-authority.

New site strategy

  • New site launch (new-site-launch-strategy.md) — The full 0-to-100 foundation playbook for a brand-new domain. Combines entity stacking, citations, first content, and realistic velocity.

Step 3: Anchor Text Safety

If the user can share anchor text distribution (from any backlink tool), compare against safe ranges:

  • Branded (business name, domain): 40-50%
  • Naked URL: 15-20%
  • Generic ("click here", "read more"): 15-20%
  • Partial match: 10-15%
  • Exact match: 3-5% MAX — over 5% is a penalty risk

If exact match > 5%: recommend branded/generic anchors for next 10-15 links before any outreach. For the full safety framework (why these ranges, what Penguin actually looks at, recovery playbook), load references/anchor-text-safety-guide.md.

If they can't share this data, skip this step.

Step 4: Output

Authority Phase Assessment

Phase classification with reasoning.

Top 3 Recommended Tactics

Matched to the phase. For each: tactic name, why it fits this phase, expected referring domains, time investment, specific first action to take. Reference the full playbook.

Link Velocity Guidelines

  • Month 1: 15-25 foundation links
  • Months 2-3: 5-10 quality links
  • Months 4-6: 8-15
  • Month 7+: 10-30

Red flags: 50+ in one month, all from the same country, spike in exact-match anchors. Load references/link-velocity-redflags.md for the full red-flag catalog and SpamBrain detection patterns when diagnosing a velocity penalty.

What to Ignore

  • Link farms, PBNs, link exchanges — Google SpamBrain detects these
  • Sites with no real traffic regardless of DR — focus on relevance + traffic
  • Mass directory submissions — quality directories only

Next Step

Once foundation links are built, a keyword deep dive on your biggest opportunity keyword will show which pages would benefit most from the new link equity.

Bundled references

Load from references/ only when the step or situation calls for them.

Tactic playbooks (references/tactics/) — load one before giving execution instructions for that tactic in Step 2:

  • entity-stacking.md, citations-directories.md, competitor-backlink-gap.md, guest-posting.md, resource-pages.md, skyscraper-technique.md, strategic-partnerships.md, podcast-guesting.md, new-site-launch-strategy.md

Diagnostic and safety references (references/):

  • phase-classification-tree.md — decision tree when Step 1 signals are ambiguous
  • anchor-text-safety-guide.md — full anchor safety framework and penalty recovery (Step 3)
  • link-velocity-redflags.md — velocity red flags and SpamBrain patterns (diagnosing a traffic drop that looks link-related)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.