agentleFS
fjilvvifjilvvi/growthlens/skills/online-school-audit/SKILL.md

online-school-audit

Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

End-to-end teardown of an online school, course, or coaching business from its public site and funnels — niche & positioning, offer/value ladder, the launch or webinar funnel, pricing & payment plans, proof & guarantees, content/SEO and ad presence, and community/retention — ending with their growth model and where they're exposed. Use when the user shares an online school, course, info-product, or coaching/EdTech site and asks to "audit", "break down", "analyze", or "reverse-engineer the funnel of" that education business.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    No invented enrollment, revenue, or student numbers.

    line 120

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Online School Audit (flagship)

The full teardown of a course / coaching / online-school business: niche, offer, funnel, pricing, proof, traffic, and retention — and how they actually grow.

What it does

Runs a complete, structured audit of an education business (online school, course, cohort program, membership, or coaching) from public pages and funnels. It connects the marketing front end to the offer and the back-end economics, and ends with a read on their growth model and vulnerabilities. This is the flagship skill — it composes the lenses of several GrowthLens skills into one domain-specific playbook. See the playbook for funnel patterns and benchmarks to look for.

When to use this skill

  • "Audit this online school / course / coaching business: <url>."
  • "Reverse-engineer <creator>'s funnel."
  • "Break down how this EdTech / info-product business works."
  • Competitive research in the online-education / creator-education space.

Inputs needed

  • Required: the school's main site or sales-page URL.
  • Helpful: the niche, the creator/brand, whether it's evergreen or launch- based, the user's goal (compete, model their funnel, find weaknesses), and any enrollment/price info the user has.
  • Trace the visible funnel by following the primary CTA (opt-in → webinar/VSL → sales page → checkout). If a step is gated (e.g. paid webinar), note it.

Method

Work the eight blocks. For each, separate observed from inferred.

  1. Niche & positioning — the transformation promised, the audience, and the differentiator vs other programs. (Lens of positioning-messaging-audit.)
  2. Offer & value ladder — lead magnet → low-ticket → core program → high-ticket / mastermind / continuity. Map rungs and price jumps. (Lens of offer-teardown.)
  3. Acquisition funnel — identify the funnel type: lead-magnet→email, webinar/masterclass (live or evergreen), VSL, challenge, application/booking, or organic→DM. Map the steps and the conversion event.
  4. Pricing & payment — price points, payment plans/installments, pay-in-full bonus, anchoring, scholarships, urgency (cart close, cohort start). (Lens of pricing-analysis.)
  5. Proof & guarantees — student results, testimonials (named, with numbers), case studies, before/after, the guarantee, and authority signals. (Lens of social-proof-audit.) Flag unverifiable income/results claims.
  6. Traffic & content — SEO/blog/YouTube, lead magnets, paid ads (check ad libraries if available), partnerships/affiliates, and the main traffic engine.
  7. Community & retention — community platform, cohort vs self-paced, coaching/support, continuity/membership, and what drives completion & renewals.
  8. Growth model & vulnerabilities — synthesize: launch vs evergreen, the primary growth lever, what depends on the founder's personal brand, and where a competitor could attack (thin proof, single channel, weak retention).

Output format

# Online School Audit — <Brand / creator>

## TL;DR
- The transformation sold, the funnel type, how they monetize, and the #1 weakness.

## 1. Niche & positioning
## 2. Offer & value ladder
| Rung | Offer | Price | Role |
|------|-------|-------|------|

## 3. Acquisition funnel
- Funnel type:
- Steps: opt-in → ... → conversion event →
- Message-match along the path:

## 4. Pricing & payment
| Plan | Price | Payment options | Anchors / urgency |
|------|-------|-----------------|-------------------|

## 5. Proof & guarantees
- Strength of proof / any unverifiable claims:
- Guarantee:

## 6. Traffic & content
- Primary engine: · Secondary:

## 7. Community & retention
- Format (cohort/self-paced), support, continuity:

## 8. Growth model & vulnerabilities
| Growth levers | Vulnerabilities (where to attack) |
|---------------|-----------------------------------|

## Strategic read
2–3 sentences: how they grow, and the single best opening against them.

Quality bar

  • Mark each finding observed vs inferred; trace the funnel by actually following CTAs.
  • Do not repeat or validate income/earnings claims as fact — note them and flag them as marketing claims (these are common and often non-compliant).
  • No invented enrollment, revenue, or student numbers.
  • Analyze the business, not the creator as a private individual.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Reviewing only the sales page and missing the funnel that feeds it.
  • Treating testimonials and income screenshots as evidence of efficacy.
  • Stopping at "it's a course" without the funnel type and growth model.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.