agentleFS
fifersheepfifersheep/flow/skills/flow-research/SKILL.md

flow-research

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Flow phase 2 (research). Normally invoked via /flow. Codebase recon plus optional web research; writes research.md with file:line references.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Stop and route the user to /flow shape instead of planning a guess.

    line 30
  2. Very specific:

    Advance: Update updated + Next action, set phase: planning, announce (reference research.md by path), invoke the flow-plan skill.

    line 31

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Flow — research

  1. Codebase recon first (inline): what already exists for this task — relevant files, conventions, constraints, prior art (existing specs/plans, git history). Small task area → do it all inline.
  2. Fan out only for breadth. Up to 3 parallel flow-researcher agents, each with ONE scoped question (e.g. one per subsystem, or one for an unfamiliar library). Cap at 3; if you want more, the task is too big — say so. Web research only when the task genuinely needs outside knowledge. Dispatch synchronously when you'd only wait anyway; if you background them, end each prompt with "deliver your findings via SendMessage to main" — background agents otherwise idle silently with the results stranded in their own context.
  3. Write research.md in the task folder: Findings (with file:line), Constraints & prior art, Open questions. Dense; no pasted file bodies.
  4. Triage the unknowns, then ask. Sort every open question: code-resolvable → go read the code, never ask; conventional default → record it, don't ask; deferred or tunable → record it with an owner; shape-changing intent → ask now. Only that last class interrupts the user: ONE AskUserQuestion round, ≤4 questions, recommended option first and marked. Write each answer to the workflow.md decision log immediately. Everything you recorded rather than asked carries into plan.md's Assumptions section — silently guessing is the failure this step exists to prevent. Guard: more than 3 shape-changing questions means the task was never shaped. Stop and route the user to /flow shape instead of planning a guess.
  5. Advance. Update updated + Next action, set phase: planning, announce (reference research.md by path), invoke the flow-plan skill.

Idempotent resume: if research.md already has findings, extend — don't redo.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.