agentleFS
ffrolivaffroliva/gflow-cli/skills/plan/SKILL.md

plan

Skill367 starsChanged 58 days agoMITView on GitHub

Creates a structured task-by-task implementation plan for a gflow-cli feature. Gathers predict/scenario context, asks ≤3 clarifying questions, decomposes the feature into atomic committable tasks with step and test checklists, and writes docs/superpowers/plans/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/PLAN.md. Invoke after /gflow:predict returns GO or CAUTION and /gflow:scenario output is available.

184 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use heartmula, webhook-subscriptions and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • math-incSkill

    heartmula

    Set up and run HeartMuLa, the open-source music generation model family (Suno-like). Generates full songs from lyrics + tags with multilingual support.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • Tommy-ywSkill

    webhook-subscriptions

    Create and manage webhook subscriptions for event-driven agent activation, or for direct push notifications (zero LLM cost). Use when the user wants external services to trigger agent runs OR push notifications to chats.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • math-incSkill

    minecraft-modpack-server

    Set up a modded Minecraft server from a CurseForge/Modrinth server pack zip. Covers NeoForge/Forge install, Java version, JVM tuning, firewall, LAN config, backups, and launch scripts.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • john-data-chenSkill

    touchdesigner-mcp

    Control a running TouchDesigner instance via twozero MCP — create operators, set parameters, wire connections, execute Python, build real-time visuals. 36 native tools.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • gaebalaiSkill

    codex-system

    PROACTIVELY consult Codex CLI, your highly capable supporter with exceptional reasoning and task completion abilities. Codex is a trusted expert you should ALWAYS consult BEFORE making decisions on: design choices, implementation approaches, debugging strategies, refactoring plans, or any non-trivial problem. When uncertain, consult Codex. Don't hesitate - Codex provides better analysis. Explicit triggers: "think deeper", "analyze", "second opinion", "consult codex".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ibahgatSkill

    context-optimize

    Improve context efficiency and cache stability for long or complex sessions.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +3 more from math-inc

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    After /gflow:predict returns GO or CAUTION

    line 30
  2. Very specific:

    When a backlog item in PLAN.md needs a concrete task breakdown before starting work

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask at most 3. Focus on decisions that materially change the task breakdown:

    line 68
  4. Distinctive:

    Test scaffold tasks (red tests, BDD skeleton) come before the code that makes them green.

    line 80
  5. Distinctive:

    Every task lists: what it does, which files change, step checklist, test checklist.

    line 83
  6. Distinctive:

    except task 6: If the plan has a task 5, it has a task 6, because gflow ships every capability twice and the automated gates cannot see the …

    line 99
  7. Very specific:

    Write the plan to docs/superpowers/plans/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/PLAN.md.

    line 184

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

plan — Feature Plan Creator

Turns a feature description into a task-by-task implementation plan and writes it to docs/superpowers/plans/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<feature-slug>/PLAN.md.

Position in the gflow-cli workflow:

/gflow:predict <proposal>   →  GO / CAUTION / STOP verdict
/gflow:scenario <feature>   →  edge cases + BDD skeleton
/gflow:plan <feature>       →  writes the task checklist  ← this skill
/gflow:status               →  surfaces next task during execution
/gflow:check                →  before each commit

When to invoke

  • After /gflow:predict returns GO or CAUTION
  • When a backlog item in PLAN.md needs a concrete task breakdown before starting work
  • Any feature larger than a single isolated file change

When not to invoke

  • Simple bug fixes (< 10 lines, no boundary crossing) — go straight to the fix
  • Pure doc changes
  • A task already fully specified in a superpowers plan — use /gflow:status to find it

Protocol

Phase 1 — Gather inputs from context

From /gflow:predict output in context (do not ask if already present):

  • Verdict (GO / CAUTION) and confidence score
  • Architectural constraints and module placement
  • Security risks and mandatory mitigations
  • Devil's Advocate simplifications or sequencing blockers

From /gflow:scenario output in context (do not ask if already present):

  • Critical and High scenarios → these become must-cover tests in the task checklist
  • BDD Scenario: blocks → seeds the BDD scaffold task

From the feature description passed to this skill:

  • Feature name → derive a slug (lowercase, hyphen-separated, no dates)
  • Stated goal (one sentence)

From the repo — run once:

uv run python scripts/dev/active_plan.py

Note the active phase name and its open tasks. Then read PLAN.md § "Phase status" and § "Decision log" directly to verify the proposed feature is within current scope and does not contradict an existing ADR. (The script shows the current task, not a backlog index — use PLAN.md for scope confirmation.)

Phase 2 — Ask clarifying questions (only if not answerable from context)

Ask at most 3. Focus on decisions that materially change the task breakdown:

  1. Scope boundary — what is explicitly out of scope for this plan?
  2. Module ownership — which existing module does this extend, or is a new module justified?
  3. Acceptance criteria — what does "done" look like from the user's perspective (command output, exit code, log event)?

Skip any question already answered by predict/scenario output or the feature description.

Phase 3 — Decompose into tasks

Task rules:

  • Each task must be independently committable as one atomic git commit.
  • Test scaffold tasks (red tests, BDD skeleton) come before the code that makes them green.
  • Tasks that create new files come before tasks that modify callers.
  • Derive test requirements from scenario output: Critical → must-cover (- [ ]), High → should-cover.
  • Every task lists: what it does, which files change, step checklist, test checklist.

Typical task order for a gflow-cli feature:

#TaskNotes
1Unit test scaffoldRed tests only. No production code.
2BDD scaffoldRed BDD scenarios. No production code.
3Core implementationDomain objects / value types / parsers.
4Transport / API layerFlowApiClient or UiAutomationTransport changes.
5CLI surfacecli_*.py + Click commands + --help text.
6MCP surface mirrorNever optional when task 5 exists. mcp/tools.py signature + docstring claims, the queued-path payload keys in worker/codec.py, tests/mcp/test_cli_parity.py for a new leaf.
7Docs updateUSAGE.md, CONFIGURATION.md (new env vars), docs/MCP.md, KNOWN_ISSUES.md if relevant.
8Full gates + release prep/gflow:check green; CHANGELOG updated.

Adjust: not every task applies to every feature. Merge or split tasks as the scope demands — except task 6. If the plan has a task 5, it has a task 6, because gflow ships every capability twice and the automated gates cannot see the two drifting apart. A plan that touches the CLI and has no MCP task is incomplete, not lean. The mirror axes are enumerated once, in skills/check/SKILL.md step 1b; cite them, do not copy them.

Phase 4 — Draft the plan and show it to the user

Produce the full PLAN.md content using this schema:

# <Feature Display Name> Implementation Plan

> **For agentic workers:** Run `/gflow:status --feature <slug>` to find the next
> unchecked task. Implement one task at a time. Run `/gflow:check` before every commit.

**Goal:** <one sentence — the user-visible outcome>

**Architecture:** <2–3 sentences — which modules change, key design decisions, what stays the same>

**Predict verdict:** <GO / CAUTION — confidence N/10> (or "pending — run /gflow:predict first")

**Risk register:**
| Severity | Risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| (from predict output) | | |

---

## File structure

### New files
\`\`\`
src/gflow_cli/<module>.py
  <one-line description>
tests/<module>/test_<module>.py
  <one-line description>
\`\`\`

### Modified files
\`\`\`
src/gflow_cli/<existing>.py
  <what changes>
\`\`\`

---

## Task 1 — <name> (test scaffold)

**What:** <one sentence>

**Files:**
- `tests/...` — <description>

**Steps:**
- [ ] <step>

**Tests created (red):**
- [ ] <test name> — <what it asserts>

---

## Task 2 — ...

(repeat for each task)

---

## Definition of done

- [ ] All task steps checked off
- [ ] `/gflow:check` green (ruff / format / pyright / pytest ≥ 80% coverage)
- [ ] `CHANGELOG.md` `[Unreleased]` section updated
- [ ] Docs updated (`USAGE.md` / `CONFIGURATION.md` as applicable)
- [ ] BDD feature file covers all Critical + High scenarios from `/gflow:scenario`
- [ ] No `# TODO` in diff without a tracked issue link

Show the drafted plan to the user. If they approve (or say "write it"), proceed to Phase 5.

Phase 5 — Write the file

mkdir -p docs/superpowers/plans/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>

Write the plan to docs/superpowers/plans/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/PLAN.md.

Confirm with:

Plan written to docs/superpowers/plans/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/PLAN.md. Run /gflow:status --feature <slug> to start working on it.


Output example (header only)

# Batch Manifest Ledger Implementation Plan

> **For agentic workers:** Run `/gflow:status --feature batch-manifest-ledger` to
> find the next unchecked task. Implement one task at a time. Run `/gflow:check`
> before every commit.

**Goal:** Add a local SQLite ledger to `gflow video batch` so interrupted runs skip
already-completed items on resume.

**Predict verdict:** GO — confidence 8/10

**Risk register:**
| Severity | Risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| High | Schema migration on user's existing DB | Checksummed migration runner (already in data/) |
| Medium | Ledger path drift between runs | Normalize to absolute path at record time |

Integration & Pipeline Continuation (Next Step Handoff)

  • Claude Code: invoke via /gflow:plan <feature> (thin wrapper around this skill).
  • Cursor / Aider / Codex: paste this file into your context and call plan <feature>.
  • Antigravity (agy): include in system context before asking for a plan.
  • Next step: Upon completing and user-approving PLAN.md, proactively announce: "Implementation Plan approved. Next step: Phase 6 Task Execution (/gflow:status --feature <slug>)."

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.