create-issue
Skill15 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create a well-documented issue in Linear with objective, description, acceptance criteria, and technical notes
63 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- neko3cs/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dsifry/metaswarmtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alexander-kastil/copilot-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nateslabach/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- blamechris/chroxytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- javierbrea/eslint-plugin-boundariestheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use native-nostalgia-stack, software-engineering-excellence and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
frostneySkillnative-nostalgia-stack
Applies the user's FreePascal toolchain and its build, formatting, hook, and test contracts while leaving project-specific mechanics local. Use when scaffolding or working in a FreePascal project that follows this toolchain.
Also in 3 projects that use this
frostneySkillsoftware-engineering-excellence
Applies the user's engineering standards during substantial technical work: preserve scope, use current evidence, delegate independent parts, and complete authorized outcomes. Use during substantial implementation, debugging, refactoring, or multi-part delivery work.
Also in 3 projects that use this
withpiperSkillroadmap-review
Audit roadmap health — issues, dependency order, spec coverage, doc freshness. Use when speccing a new initiative. Use when /phase-plan output looks suspicious. Use before /roadmap-create reruns.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillimplement-issue
Implement a Site Kit GitHub issue end-to-end from its implementation brief. Use when the user asks to implement, build, or work on a GitHub issue / feature by number (e.g. "implement issue #12345", "build the feature in issue 12345", "follow the implementation brief for #12345") in the google/site-kit-wp repo.
Also in 6 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillcreate-release
Use when creating a new ASO release, including pre-checks, release notes generation, draft GitHub release creation, documentation updates, and ROADMAP changes.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillupdate-pr
Update the pull request for the current session. Use when the user wants to push new changes to an existing PR.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions63 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 63
- penpot/penpot★ 62ksame name
- videojs/video.js★ 40ksame name
- yugabyte/yugabyte-db★ 11ksame name
- antiwork/gumroad★ 10ksame name
- gitkraken/vscode-gitlens★ 10ksame name
- camunda/camunda★ 4.4ksame name
- robustmq/robustmq★ 1.9ksame name
- aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-typescript★ 1.8ksame name
- classroomio/classroomio★ 1.7ksame name
- tikv/pd★ 1.2ksame name
53 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- close-issueSkill
- fix-secretSkill
- start-issueSkill
- statusSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 53 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Create a well-documented issue in Linear following a standard template.
- Distinctive: line 24
If the user writes in Spanish, use the Spanish template
- Distinctive: line 25
If the user writes in English, use the English template
- Very specific: line 26
If unclear, check the ISSUE_LANG env var (default: es)
- Distinctive: line 85
Objetivo/Objective: Always include. One sentence explaining the "what" and "why".
- Distinctive: line 86
Descripción/Description: Always include. 2-3 sentences with context, scope, and approach.
- Distinctive: line 87
Criterios de Aceptación/Acceptance Criteria: Always include. Each criterion must be:
- Distinctive: line 106
If the user gives a vague request, infer reasonable criteria from the project context.
- Distinctive: line 107
If the user only gives a title, generate the full description based on the project (Task Board).
- Distinctive: line 109
Every issue must have at least: Objetivo, Descripción, and Criterios de Aceptación.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 53 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create Issue
Create a well-documented issue in Linear following a standard template.
Usage Examples
/create-issue Add dark mode toggle
/create-issue Agregar contador de tareas por columna
/create-issue Fix login bug on mobileLanguage
Detect the language from the user's request:
- If the user writes in Spanish, use the Spanish template
- If the user writes in English, use the English template
- If unclear, check the
ISSUE_LANGenv var (default:es)
Steps
- Parse the request: Extract the title and any details the user provides.
- Build the description using the template for the detected language:
Spanish Template (default for this project)
## Objetivo
Breve descripción de lo que logra este issue y por qué es importante.
## Descripción
Explicación detallada de la feature, bug o tarea. Incluye contexto
que ayude a entender el alcance y el enfoque.
## Criterios de Aceptación
- [ ] Primer criterio medible
- [ ] Segundo criterio medible
- [ ] Tercer criterio medible
## Notas Técnicas
- Archivos, componentes o áreas del código relevantes
- Dependencias o restricciones
- Enfoque sugerido (si aplica)English Template
## Objective
Brief description of what this issue accomplishes and why it matters.
## Description
Detailed explanation of the feature, bug, or task. Include context
that helps understand the scope and approach.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] First measurable criterion
- [ ] Second measurable criterion
- [ ] Third measurable criterion
## Technical Notes
- Relevant files, components, or areas of the codebase
- Dependencies or constraints
- Suggested approach (if applicable)- Create the issue:
python3 scripts/linear_client.py create "<TITLE>" "<DESCRIPTION>" - Confirm to the user showing the issue ID, title, and URL.
Template Rules
- Objetivo/Objective: Always include. One sentence explaining the "what" and "why".
- Descripción/Description: Always include. 2-3 sentences with context, scope, and approach.
- Criterios de Aceptación/Acceptance Criteria: Always include. Each criterion must be:
- Specific and measurable (not vague like "funciona bien" / "works well")
- Testable (can be verified as done or not done)
- Written as
- [ ]checkboxes (the harness gate 3 checks these)
- Notas Técnicas/Technical Notes: Include when relevant.
Examples of Good vs Bad Criteria
Bad / Mal:
- Dark mode works / El dark mode funciona
- Looks good / Se ve bien
Good / Bien:
- Toggle button visible in the header / Botón toggle visible en el header
- Clicking toggle switches styles / Al hacer click cambia los estilos
- Preference persists via localStorage / La preferencia se guarda en localStorage
Rules
- If the user gives a vague request, infer reasonable criteria from the project context.
- If the user only gives a title, generate the full description based on the project (Task Board).
- The issue is created in the team defined by
LINEAR_TEAM_KEYenv var. - Every issue must have at least: Objetivo, Descripción, and Criterios de Aceptación.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

