ship
Skill18 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Close out a Linear or GitHub issue whose branch is merged or ready to merge. Rebase, squash merge, set the issue to Done, file only the out-of-scope findings that earn an issue, remove the worktree, delete the branch, and refresh the local git state. For a project whose CLAUDE.md names where it tracks work. Use when the user says "I merged it", "update my local git", "clean up the worktree", "wrap this up", "close this out", or runs /pipe-skills:ship in such a project.
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- saleem-hadad/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- yagizdo/quivertheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- ShipfoxHQ/shipfoxtheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- wboayue/rust-ibapitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- sanmidable/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Yesterday-AI/ytstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ios-sync, open-gstack-browser and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Saqlain-811Skillios-sync
Regenerate the iOS debug bridge against the latest upstream gstack templates. (gstack)
Also in 6 projects that use this
seek888Skillopen-gstack-browser
Launch GStack Browser — AI-controlled Chromium with the sidebar extension baked in. Opens a visible browser window where you can watch every action in real time. The sidebar shows a live activity feed and chat. Anti-bot stealth built in. Use when asked to "open gstack browser", "launch browser", "connect chrome", "open chrome", "real browser", "launch chrome", "side panel", or "control my browser". Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "show me the browser".
Also in 10 projects that use this
ayudaySkillsetup-deploy
Configure deployment settings for /land-and-deploy. Detects your deploy platform (Fly.io, Render, Vercel, Netlify, Heroku, GitHub Actions, custom), production URL, health check endpoints, and deploy status commands. Writes the configuration to CLAUDE.md so all future deploys are automatic. Use when: "setup deploy", "configure deployment", "set up land-and-deploy", "how do I deploy with gstack", "add deploy config".
Also in 19 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkilllanding-report
Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)
Also in 9 projects that use this
zebbernSkilldebug-fix
Find and fix a bug or issue — from any source (GitHub issue, error message, user report, or observed behavior)
Also in 4 projects that use this
ramybarsoumSkilldocument-release
Post-ship documentation update. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, cleans up TODOS, and optionally bumps VERSION. Use when asked to "update the docs", "sync documentation", or "post-ship docs". Proactively suggest after a PR is merged or code is shipped.
Also in 23 projects that use this
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- rtk-ai/rtk★ 86ksame name
- simstudioai/sim★ 30ksame name
- millionco/react-doctor★ 15ksame name
- BuilderIO/agent-native★ 7.6ksame name
- nightly-labs/openbot★ 6.3ksame name
- fallow-rs/fallow★ 5.3ksame name
- puncsky/system-design-and-architecture★ 3.6ksame name
- plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills★ 3.1ksame name
- ShenSeanChen/waku-agent★ 2ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adviseSkill
- assessSkill
- autonomous-loopSkill
- awaySkill
- final-stateSkill
- implementSkill
- interviewSkill
- prdSkill
- promote-ruleSkill
- reviewSkill
- setupSkill
- sweepSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 180 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 11
Read the final verdict in the merge-gate comment.
- Distinctive: line 13
Run the merge, the cleanup and the checkout from the main checkout, not from the worktree, because git refuses a branch that another …
- Distinctive: line 21
Leave the worktree with ExitWorktree when the session is in it, remove it, and run git worktree prune.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 180 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ship an issue
The project CLAUDE.md names where it tracks work. Read the tracker file for it, ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/trackers/linear.md or ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/trackers/github.md, and run each operation below as that file says. Read the branch and the target branch from the user's argument, else from the merge-gate comment on the issue, else from gh pr view.
Read the final verdict in the merge-gate comment. When it is not ready, or no merge-gate comment exists, say so in the plan and do not merge without a go from the user.
Run the merge, the cleanup and the checkout from the main checkout, not from the worktree, because git refuses a branch that another worktree holds.
Report the state and the plan first. Wait for a go before a step that can lose work: an unpushed commit, an uncommitted change, or a rebase. Then run the steps that still apply:
- Rebase the branch onto the target branch, if it is behind.
- Squash merge: mark a draft pull request ready with
gh pr ready <n>, thengh pr merge <n> --squash --subject "<identifier>: <issue title> (#<n>)". Without a pull request,git merge --squash <branch>and a commit titled<identifier>: <issue title>whose body keeps the step messages. - Close the issue, and add a comment with the merge commit and the findings that the merge-gate comment lists.
- File a follow-up issue only for an out-of-scope finding that is a reproduced bug, a broken
CLAUDE.mdrule, or a feature of high value. Before you file, add the case to an open issue with the same cause, if there is one. File nothing when the closed issue is itself a follow-up. Start each new issue withDeferred from the review of <identifier>.and link it to the closed issue. - Leave the worktree with ExitWorktree when the session is in it, remove it, and run
git worktree prune. - Leave the local repository equal to the remote: the target branch at
origin/<target>, and no local branch, remote branch, or stale remote-tracking ref of the shipped branch. Never lose the merge or a commit that it does not hold, and never touch an uncommitted change of the user. Without a remote, delete the local branch and check out the target branch.
Report the merge commit, the closed issue, the issues you filed or added a case to, and what step 6 could not clean, with the reason. Never use --no-verify, and never force-push a shared branch.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

