deep-research
Skill248 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
仅在用户显式调用 `$deep-research` 时,用 Codex CLI 子任务完成多来源深度调研并综合成带出处的报告。不用于单次查证或已给定材料的总结。
196 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ridelink0/ultimate-frontend-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- chrisblattman/claudeblattmantheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- genericService/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ourostack/ouroboros-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mahsumaktas/agent-evolution-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- insight68/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use community-led-growth, ph-community-outreach and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
W-MoorerSkillacademic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
Also in 11 projects that use this
W-MoorerSkillacademic-pipeline
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
Also in 10 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillmicro-saas-launcher
Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.
Also in 5 projects that use this
stophobiaSkillsurprise-me
Create a delightful, unexpected "wow" experience for the user by dynamically discovering and creatively combining other enabled skills. Triggers when the user says "surprise me" or any request expressing a desire for an unexpected creative showcase. Also triggers when the user is bored, wants inspiration, or asks for "something interesting".
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +4 more from nicepkg
- +1 more from W-Moorer
Other versions196 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 196
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246ksame name
- bytedance/deer-flow★ 85ksame name
- Imbad0202/academic-research-skills★ 56ksame name
- THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC★ 43ksame name
- HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills★ 12ksame name
- genspark-ai/genoffice★ 12ksame name
- advaitpaliwal/feynman★ 10ksame name
- companion-inc/feynman★ 10ksame name
- getcompanion-ai/feynman★ 10ksame name
- jordan-gibbs/hyperresearch★ 4.4ksame name
186 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- brainstormingSkill
- claude-skillSkill
- code-simplifierSkill
- github-fix-issueSkill
- github-review-prSkill
- gpt-image-skillSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- minimax-image-skillSkill
- nanobanana-skillSkill
- youtube-transcribe-skillSkill
The file
Files
Deep Research
主控负责界定问题、拆分、核验与综合;子任务负责互不重叠的采集或局部分析。完成标准是用户需要的报告和证据覆盖,不是子进程退出或材料聚合成功。
核心约束
- 保持用户当前模型和推理配置,不传
--model,不覆盖无关配置。 - 子进程默认使用
workspace-write;只有确实需要 shell 网络访问时才启用 runner 的--network。 - 先检查当前会话可用的 Skills、连接器和 MCP,再按来源适配能力;不要假设固定服务或工具名存在。
- 不使用
--dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox。 - 所有运行产物写入独立的
.research/<name>/目录。 - 只在委派已获授权时启动子任务。执行前简述拆分与成本;超出已有预算、访问范围或权限时再征求同意,不因正常使用已授权的研究来源重复暂停。
按需加载
准备运行子任务时读 references/runner.md,其中包含目录、manifest、命令与恢复约束。两个脚本均只依赖 Python 标准库;--help 给出参数真源。
Workflow
- 从用户请求中提取目标、时间范围、来源边界和交付格式,只追问会改变研究结论或执行范围的缺口。用代表性真实样本校准拆分,复用已有材料。
- 为每个子任务明确问题、输入、允许访问的范围、输出和证据要求。要求结论旁附来源,无法确认的内容说明缺口。将采集材料保存在运行目录内,避免重复抓取。
- 选择与任务成本相称的并发和超时,陌生或高成本批次先小规模验证。主控同步推进非重叠工作,不重复子任务正在做的采集。
- 检查
results.json、子报告和关键原始来源。失败、空输出、缺失引用或未覆盖的问题仍是未完成;按 runner 参考中的恢复约束有限重试,不重跑已验证成功的任务。缺少权限或需要扩大范围时停止相应操作并说明阻塞。 - 使用
aggregate.py整理内部材料,再综合为polished_report.md(用户指定位置优先)。消除重复、核对关键数据、区分来源冲突和证据强弱;aggregated_raw.md不是成品。
交付报告绝对路径、关键结论和剩余缺口,说明实际使用的权限例外。必要证据仍缺失时,报告已完成范围、具体阻塞及恢复条件,不把部分材料称为完整报告;不要发送内部 Prompt 或调度日志充当成品。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

