agentleFS
Sign inStart free
farslabfarslab/claude-skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md

receiving-code-review

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

200 other projects use a version of this, 119 of them edited; 13 new projects in the last 4 weeks, against 12 the 4 before.

Adopted by

Steady: 13 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, 1.1× the 4 weeks before.

Week of Sep 13: 2 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 1 new projectWeek of Sep 27: 4 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 5 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 4 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 5 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 4 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read.

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 4 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-code-review

    中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时，用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-commit-conventions

    中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • obraSkill

    diagnosing-superpowers

    Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.

    Also in 20 projects that use this

  • +3 more from Leodorareluctant259

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 6

    Common

    Most of the 140 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 140 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free