no-silent-fallback
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use whenever an expected capability cannot run or is replaced by a weaker/manual path; do not treat optional spec-only capabilities as fallback.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- capability-auditSkill
- capability-routingSkill
- memory-routingSkill
- session-closeSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- using-containerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 66
If repeated or meaningful, propose a new skill, tool, hook, subagent, test, or rule (--signal).
- Distinctive: line 68
Do not turn small harmless adaptations into incident paperwork.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
No Silent Fallback
Core Rule
Work quietly when the planned path works. When you switch to a weaker path, make the switch visible: expected path, actual path, cause, and impact.
Expected Capability
A capability is expected only when at least one is true:
- the user explicitly requested it,
- the agent plan promised it,
- the host runtime declares it active,
- project
memory/MEMORY.mdorCAN.mdrequires it for this task, - a previous fallback/pending item explicitly made it part of the current work.
Spec-only assets are not expected unless installed by an adapter or explicitly requested.
Fallback Means
- hook expected but unavailable,
- subagent expected but unavailable,
- tool expected but unavailable,
- expected skill not used,
- expected write/search/close/TodoWrite done manually instead of the expected mechanism,
- verification weakened or skipped,
- expected runtime capability absent.
Not Fallback
- a hook stays silent because no capability is relevant,
- a skill is used quietly,
- a tool succeeds normally,
- a subagent is unnecessary for a small task.
- a spec-only hook/subagent is not installed and was never requested.
Report Format
Report the fallback to the user. Persist meaningful or repeated fallbacks with the backbone script so future sessions can learn from them:
scripts/fallback_log.sh --expected "<what should have run>" \
--actual "<what ran instead>" --mechanism "<name>" \
--cause "<why>" --impact "<impact>" --signal skill|tool|hook|subagent|test|rule|none \
--memory-dir ./memoryThe script is idempotent (same expected+actual+mechanism is never duplicated) and
writes a canonical block to memory/fallbacks.md. In Claude Code it lives at
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/fallback_log.sh.
Learning Signal
If repeated or meaningful, propose a new skill, tool, hook, subagent, test, or rule
(--signal). A recurring --mechanism is the trigger for fmc-fallback-review.
Do not turn small harmless adaptations into incident paperwork.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

