edda
AGENTS.md36 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Before doing repository work, read .claude/CLAUDE.md completely. It is the canonical project guide for architecture, Rust conventions, tests, decisions, and multi-agent coordination. Claude Code and Codex sessions get the edda pack injected by a hook. If you are not one of those, run these three before touching any file, and treat their output as the pack: 1. edda context — decisions, peers, off-limits paths. 2. edda task list — the task rail; pick the task assigned to you. 3. edda…
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,700 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-browserSkill
- arch-specSkill
- code-qualitySkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commitSkill
- coord-delegateSkill
- coord-handoffSkill
- coord-orchestrateSkill
- coord-requestSkill
- coord-reviewSkill
- coord-runSkill
- coord-syncSkill
- dispatchSkill
- edda-releaseSkill
- fleet-epic-splitSkill
- fleet-managerSkill
- fleet-orchestrateSkill
- fleet-pr-loopSkill
- fleet-reviewSkill
- fleet-triadSkill
- fleet-workerSkill
- ground-checkSkill
- health-checkSkill
- intel-scanSkill
- issue-actionSkill
- issue-compactSkill
- issue-createSkill
- issue-intakeSkill
- issue-pipelineSkill
- issue-planSkill
- issue-scanSkill
- parallel-waveSkill
- path-forwardSkill
- plan-decomposeSkill
- plan-validateSkill
- pr-checkSkill
- project-planSkill
- Project PrinciplesSkill
- pr-review-loopSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- pull-requestSkill
- regression-guardSkill
- skill-aliasSkill
- skill-craftSkill
- skill-testSkill
- spec-review-modesSkill
- tech-debtSkill
- testingSkill
- tracking-issueSkill
- verifiable-goal-loopSkill
- fleet-orchestrateSkill
The file
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 3
Before doing repository work, read .claude/CLAUDE.md completely.
- Distinctive: line 16
Follow it: it names your scope, who owns the gate, and what is out of scope.
- Very specific: line 28
When two or more sessions are implementing in parallel, use the host-selected coord-orchestrate projection and follow the canonical source …
- Very specific: line 30
Before editing with active peers, use $coord-sync, inspect off-limits paths, and claim the smallest accurate scope.
- Very specific: line 35
Every review handoff freezes IN SCOPE: changed behavior/paths, direct callers/consumers, issue/spec acceptance, introduced or exposed …
- Distinctive: line 49
Stop after two non-product/harness-only cycles without useful progress or at diminishing returns.
- Very specific: line 51
Verify once per frozen SHA on the ladder in .claude/CLAUDE.md: focused crate gates while iterating (L0).
- Very specific: line 62
When you compile this workspace locally, build only in the lane your brief assigns (worker-1, worker-2, verifier, verifier-2).
- Very specific: line 87
Use codex/ branch names for Codex-created branches unless directed otherwise.
- Very specific: line 88
Run the checks required by .claude/CLAUDE.md at the ladder level that matches your change before claiming completion.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Edda Codex Instructions
Before doing repository work, read .claude/CLAUDE.md completely. It is the
canonical project guide for architecture, Rust conventions, tests, decisions,
and multi-agent coordination.
Session start without edda hooks (pi, or any session edda did not launch)
Claude Code and Codex sessions get the edda pack injected by a hook. If you are not one of those, run these three before touching any file, and treat their output as the pack:
edda context— decisions, peers, off-limits paths.edda task list— the task rail; pick the task assigned to you.edda task show <id>— prints your brief without changing its lifecycle. Follow it: it names your scope, who owns the gate, and what is out of scope.
Delivery entry
Assigned sessions resume their task and brief. Small or cohesive single-writer
changes use the ordinary repository flow. A controller forms a fleet only for
two or more genuinely parallel implementing sessions; the canonical generic
route is crates/edda-cli/src/skills/coord-orchestrate.md (delivery-flow/1),
projected to the host-selected coordination skill.
Multi-session work
- When two or more sessions are implementing in parallel, use the host-selected
coord-orchestrateprojection and follow the canonical source above. - Before editing with active peers, use
$coord-sync, inspect off-limits paths, and claim the smallest accurate scope. - Record load-bearing facts in
edda taskoredda decidebefore using chat or host messaging as a doorbell. - Request permission before crossing another session's scope.
- Every review handoff freezes
IN SCOPE: changed behavior/paths, direct callers/consumers, issue/spec acceptance, introduced or exposed security or data-loss regressions, and current-base integration. Adjacent, pre-existing, or speculative findings become evidencedFOLLOW-UP ISSUEs and do not extend the current PR. This is a bounded complete review, never a minimal review: every frozen-surface failure is mandatory, and only findings genuinely outside that surface qualify for follow-up. - Reviewers complete the whole scoped audit and batch blocking P0/P1 before requesting changes. Later-round blockers must be fix-caused or previously unobservable. The issue/spec is the acceptance ceiling; extra evidence is mandatory only to prove a required fact or safety boundary.
- Select gates from code/product-blob, base, and toolchain changes. Docs- or
evidence-only pushes reuse still-applicable code gates as
READ, run only relevant validation plus exact-head CI asRAN, and record available cost. Stop after two non-product/harness-only cycles without useful progress or at diminishing returns; route follow-up or ask the operator to expand scope. - Verify once per frozen SHA on the ladder in
.claude/CLAUDE.md: focused crate gates while iterating (L0); exact-head CI at the frozen full SHA plus the verifier's applicable focused Windows-gap run (L1); reviewers READ that receipt and exact-head CI and RAN only what they do not cover (L2); a draft, label, or status flip is not a push, so nothing reruns (L3). State the reason whenever you rerun a recorded gate. Know what this repository's CI actually covers — Windows runs tests for only 7 crates — and treat a real gap as a reason to RAN a focused check of the uncovered surface, not the full set. Deterministically red CI already blocks the SHA: audit and request changes instead of spending a full run; re-run only the failed job when the red is environmental. - When you compile this workspace locally, build only in the lane your brief
assigns (
worker-1,worker-2,verifier,verifier-2). Never create ad-hocCARGO_TARGET_DIRs per round, SHA, or timestamp; solo work uses the worktree's defaulttarget/. Lane build cache is disposable; worktrees, branches, and sources are not. This is about local Cargo build output only — a session that runs no local build has no lane and needs none. Reclaim staleincrementalsessions by age, and report if the pool grows without bound; see Build lanes in.claude/CLAUDE.mdfor the measured footprint and why any fixed ceiling is provisional. - This is policy for sessions invoking
coord-review,coord-orchestrate, orfleet-orchestrate; it is not an Edda runtime rule imposed on every project. - Review immutable full SHAs; any push invalidates the prior verdict.
- On GitHub PRs, publish numbered SHA-pinned review rounds. Requested changes require an implementer point-by-point response and a new review round; merge requires a final current-head LGTM comment with P0=0, P1=0 and ran gates. Internal verifier reports do not replace the PR-visible loop. For local-only delivery, record the same fields in the strongest durable local carrier; do not invent a PR.
- Worker receipts are execution evidence, not acceptance. Merge follows the
recorded rule gate — current-head LGTM, P0=0/P1=0,
CI Gategreen, empty SHA window (docs/fleet/rules.mdR6) — never a role's own action.
Repository safety
- Preserve unrelated user changes.
- Use
codex/branch names for Codex-created branches unless directed otherwise. - Run the checks required by
.claude/CLAUDE.mdat the ladder level that matches your change before claiming completion; docs-only changes rely on exact-head CI and run no Cargo gate locally.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

