agentleFS
fabioc-alohafabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall/.github/skills/source-inventory/SKILL.md

source-inventory

Skill5 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Maintain the source registry in sources/supported-stores.json — add a new third-party plugin store, retire one, refresh metadata, validate the schema. Use when proposing a registry change, after the weekly cron flags a source as unhealthy, or when a candidate store needs evaluation before adding.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. bingyue/fde-skills★ 5same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use the /add-source prompt.

    line 84
  2. Distinctive:

    Run store-evaluation first (scorecard ≥ 7 required)

    line 86
  3. Very specific:

    Add the entry to supported-stores.json (alphabetical by name)

    line 88
  4. Very specific:

    Run node scripts/scan-sources.cjs locally with SOURCES_DIR pointing at a temp dir

    line 89
  5. Very specific:

    Verify the new store produces a plausible catalog/stores/<name>.json

    line 90
  6. Very specific:

    Commit [behaviour] add source: <name> and let Monday's cron produce the first full catalog refresh

    line 91
  7. Distinctive:

    Run staleness-discipline to confirm a staleness signal fires

    line 97
  8. Very specific:

    Add a // pruned-pending: YYYY-MM-DD reason: <reason> line above the entry and comment the entry out

    line 98
  9. Distinctive:

    Wait one weekly cron cycle to verify the catalog refresh PR shows the expected removal cleanly

    line 100
  10. Distinctive:

    Delete the commented-out entry in the next commit

    line 101
  11. Distinctive:

    When reviewing a weekly catalog-refresh PR, sanity-check each store:

    line 106

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Source Inventory

Maintain sources/supported-stores.json — the single source of truth for which upstream plugin repos the Mall scans.

The Mall does NOT keep persistent local clones of source repos. The weekly cron clones each registered source into a workflow temp directory ($SOURCES_DIR), scans it, scores it, and discards the clone. The registry file is the only persistent record.

When to Use

  • Proposing a new source store (run store-evaluation first)
  • Retiring a source store (run staleness-discipline first; use /prune-source)
  • A weekly cron PR flags a source as unhealthy (broken remote, archived, license drift)
  • Schema validation after editing supported-stores.json

The registry: sources/supported-stores.json

{
  "$schema": "./supported-stores.schema.json",
  "schema_version": "2.0",
  "stores": [
    {
      "name": "plugin-mall",                       // unique kebab-case; matches catalog/stores/<name>.json
      "remote": "https://github.com/<org>/<repo>", // upstream URL (informational; not cloned for plugin-mall)
      "pluginDir": "plugins",                      // where plugins live in the upstream repo
      "quality": "first-party",                    // tier tag — see § Quality tiers
      "provenance": true,                          // true ONLY for plugin-mall (drives +50 trust signal)
      "license": "PolyForm-Noncommercial-1.0.0",   // SPDX id, or null if unknown
      "added_at": "2026-05-29"
    },
    {
      "name": "awesome-copilot",
      "remote": "https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot",
      "pluginDir": "skills",
      "quality": "official",
      "provenance": false,
      "license": "MIT",
      "added_at": "2026-04-15"
    }
  ]
}

Required fields

FieldTypeNotes
namestringKebab-case, ≤32 chars, unique across the registry; produces catalog/stores/<name>.json
remotestringUpstream URL (HTTPS). For plugin-mall, this is informational; for everyone else, it's what bootstrap-sources.cjs clones
pluginDirstringPath under the upstream repo where plugins live (., plugins, skills, agents, etc.). Use . if plugins live at the repo root.
qualityenumSee § Quality tiers below
provenancebooltrue ONLY for plugin-mall (drives the +50 trust signal). false for all third-party stores.
licensestring or nullSPDX identifier (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, PolyForm-Noncommercial-1.0.0). null if unknown — license signal will score 0.
added_atstringYYYY-MM-DD of registry add

Optional fields

FieldTypeNotes
local_dir_namestringOverride the directory name used inside $SOURCES_DIR when bootstrapping. Defaults to name. Use when the upstream repo has a different conventional folder name.
notestringHuman-readable note (audit trail)
pruned_atstringYYYY-MM-DD of removal (use during the two-step prune; final delete removes the entry entirely)

Quality tiers

TierMeaningExamples of fit
first-partyThe Mall's own curated plugins (plugin-mall only)plugin-mall
officialMaintained by a major platform vendor with editorial standardsawesome-copilot (GitHub), microsoft-skills
community-curatedCommunity repo with explicit curation standardsawesome-mcp-servers, awesome-claude-code
communityIndividual or small-team plugin collectionspersonal skill repos
domainVertical-specific plugin collectionsgame-dev, marketing, healthcare
referenceHigh-signal individual contributorsnamed researchers, well-known authors

The quality tier is informational — it does NOT directly affect the trust score. Trust is computed from the six published signals (provenance, maintenance, adoption, license, frontmatter, README). Quality tier helps reviewers triage; the signals do the scoring.

Adding a new source

Use the /add-source prompt. Sequence:

  1. Run store-evaluation first (scorecard ≥ 7 required)
  2. Determine name, pluginDir, quality, license
  3. Add the entry to supported-stores.json (alphabetical by name)
  4. Run node scripts/scan-sources.cjs locally with SOURCES_DIR pointing at a temp dir
  5. Verify the new store produces a plausible catalog/stores/<name>.json
  6. Commit [behaviour] add source: <name> and let Monday's cron produce the first full catalog refresh

Retiring a source

Use the /prune-source prompt. Sequence:

  1. Run staleness-discipline to confirm a staleness signal fires
  2. Add a // pruned-pending: YYYY-MM-DD reason: <reason> line above the entry and comment the entry out
  3. Commit [behaviour] prune source (pending): <name>
  4. Wait one weekly cron cycle to verify the catalog refresh PR shows the expected removal cleanly
  5. Delete the commented-out entry in the next commit
  6. Commit [behaviour] prune source (delete): <name>

Health checks (run during PR review)

When reviewing a weekly catalog-refresh PR, sanity-check each store:

CheckPassAction on fail
bootstrap-sources.cjs cloned the remote successfullyWorkflow log shows clone successInvestigate remote; remote may have moved or repo may be deleted — surface in PR comments
scan-sources.cjs produced a non-zero plugin countPlugin count > 0 in catalog/stores/<name>.jsonCheck pluginDir — upstream may have renamed the plugins folder
fetch-github-stats.cjs returned dataStars / contributors / last_commit populated in scoring/github-stats.jsonAPI rate-limit hit, OR repo is archived/private — surface in PR
compute-trust.cjs produced a non-null scoretrust_score populated in catalog/stores/<name>.jsonA signal is missing or unparseable — check scoring/trust-audit.md for the per-store breakdown

Anti-Patterns

Anti-patternCorrection
Adding a source without running store-evaluationThe scorecard is the bar; skip it and stale stores accumulate
Setting provenance: true for a third-party storeProvenance is for plugin-mall only — it drives the +50 first-party trust signal, not "I trust this maintainer"
Hand-editing catalog/stores/<name>.jsonCatalog is generated; the only thing you edit is the registry
Deleting a registry entry in one commitAlways use the two-step prune so one cron cycle can verify the catalog refresh PR is clean
Skipping the schema validation stepThe schema catches simple errors (typo'd field name, wrong enum value, malformed URL) before they break the workflow

Falsifiability

This skill is wrong if any of the following occur by 2026-08-29 (90 days):

  • A registry entry that passed /add-source review gets pruned within 30 days (scorecard bar too lax)
  • A pruned store gets re-added within 30 days (staleness signals miscalibrated)
  • The schema lets through an invalid entry that breaks the workflow ≥1 time
  • The quality-tier taxonomy needs revision ≥2 times in a quarter (taxonomy is wrong shape)

Track outcomes in docs/curation-log.md tagged [SOURCE-INVENTORY].

Related

  • store-evaluation — gate before adding
  • staleness-discipline — gate before pruning
  • mall-self-curation — the pipeline this registry feeds
  • /add-source prompt
  • /prune-source prompt
  • sources/supported-stores.schema.json — JSON schema

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.