git-fatality
Skill2 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Finalizes Git work by committing, pushing, creating branches, and opening or updating pull requests. Use when the user explicitly invokes git-fatality or asks to draft commit or PR text, commit an agreed scope, push or publish a branch, create or update a pull request, or otherwise ship work through one of those actions. Do not invoke it implicitly for status or diff review, fetch, pull, merge, rebase, cherry-pick, conflict resolution, stash, or branch management unless the same request includes a covered finalization action.
- Reads credentials
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- my-voiceSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 25
Never widen the action set.
- Distinctive: line 29
If neither the request nor established context identifies authorized actions, inspect, propose the action set and text, and wait.
- Very specific: line 42
Use this path only when the requested actions, scope, branch, and destination are clear and there is no preview, detached HEAD, in-progress …
- Distinctive: line 60
Treat each requested stage independently.
- Distinctive: line 67
Run checks only when the user requests them, applicable repository instructions require them, or no still-applicable result exists for a …
- Distinctive: line 77
after committing, inspect the commit and confirm its content matches
- Distinctive: line 81
Check the actual remote ref rather than relying only on cached tracking refs or ahead counts.
- Distinctive: line 85
If any authorization-relevant value changes between inspection and mutation, stop and re-scope before continuing.
- Distinctive: line 110
Use a lowercase imperative subject with no automatic Conventional Commit prefix.
- Very specific: line 115
Use a body only for non-obvious rationale, breaking changes, or distinct sub-changes.
- Distinctive: line 118
Use no sentence-ending periods.
- Very specific: line 124
Use the required repository template when present.
- Distinctive: line 138
Use a meaningful lowercase kebab-case topic of roughly two to six words.
- Very specific: line 143
Read references/complex-flows.md only for branch creation, detached HEAD or an in-progress Git operation, named synchronization, multiple …
- Very specific: line 156
Treat .env*, credentials, keys, tokens, signing material, and unexpectedly large or generated artifacts as scope hazards.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Git Fatality
Execute exactly the Git finalization the user requests.
Authorization
- Resolve the requested actions from the current request and established conversation context. Requests such as "commit and push" or "can you push this?" authorize those actions after relevant inspection. Earlier scoped authorization remains valid when the action, scope, and destination still match; do not ask again just because the skill is invoked in a later turn.
- Never widen the action set. Commit plus push does not imply a PR; push-only does not imply staging or committing. Creating a PR includes publishing the inspected, already committed scope needed for that PR; it does not include making a new commit. Explicit restrictions such as "do not push" win.
- If neither the request nor established context identifies authorized actions, inspect, propose the action set and text, and wait. Preview-first wording requires a stop before mutation.
- Apply "yes" or "do it" only to the latest concrete proposal. Praise, silence, reactions, harness approval, or allow-all modes are not authorization.
Explicit user instructions take precedence over this skill's defaults. Complete authorized inspection and drafting before asking a necessary question. If a skill rule requires a pause, name and link to the file, quote the relevant rule, and explain the concrete unresolved action or scope.
Routine finalization
Use this path only when the requested actions, scope, branch, and destination
are clear and there is no preview, detached HEAD, in-progress Git operation,
secret hazard, rewrite/force action, or recovery. Otherwise use the complex
guidance below.
A routine commit-only, push-only, or commit-and-push request is one compact operation. Do not create or update a formal plan, todo list, or progress checklist. Give at most one short progress sentence, then act or report a real blocker.
Inspect the current branch, HEAD, worktree/index status, and exact relevant
diff before mutation. Detect merge, rebase, am, cherry-pick, revert, and bisect
state. Inspect upstreams, remote refs, and outgoing commits when publishing;
inspect the base and published head for PR work. A local commit or text-only
commit draft needs no remote lookup. Reuse applicable repository instructions,
convention mode, remote knowledge, and successful validation from the current
task.
Treat each requested stage independently. Skip a commit with no meaningful scope. A push is complete only when the intended remote branch exists at the intended commit and any requested upstream setup is satisfied. A new branch can need publishing even when its commits already exist on another remote branch. If every requested stage is complete, report that immediately.
Finalization does not discover or rerun project builds or tests by default. Run checks only when the user requests them, applicable repository instructions require them, or no still-applicable result exists for a required check. Normal commit hooks still run.
For a commit:
- stage only the intended files or hunks and preserve unrelated work
- inspect the complete staged diff and run
git diff --cached --check - immediately before committing, reconfirm branch and
HEADand re-inspect the staged scope - after committing, inspect the commit and confirm its content matches
For a push, do not touch dirty files. Recheck the branch, selected remote, destination ref, and exact outgoing commits immediately before publishing. Check the actual remote ref rather than relying only on cached tracking refs or ahead counts. After publishing, verify that remote ref's commit and the intended upstream relationship.
If any authorization-relevant value changes between inspection and mutation, stop and re-scope before continuing.
Convention mode
personal is the default and performs no history queries for style. Phrases
such as "match repo style" or conventions: repo select repo; "use my style"
or conventions: personal select personal. The latest selection persists for
later invocations in the same task until the user changes it.
Use this precedence:
- exact formatting or naming requested now
- applicable repository instructions and required PR templates
- the selected convention source
- personal conventions when
repoevidence is unclear or unavailable
In repo mode, inspect only bounded evidence for the requested artifact:
recent non-merge commits for commit text, active branch names only when naming
a branch, and recent merged PRs only when PR instructions or templates leave
style unresolved. Never fetch solely to discover style. Push-only and no-op
flows perform no convention lookup.
Personal commit style
- Use a lowercase imperative subject with no automatic Conventional Commit prefix. Describe what changed, not how.
- Target 72 characters or fewer for the subject; move detail into the body. Wrap body lines near 72 when practical, but never split or truncate an indivisible URL, identifier, filename, command, or version.
- Use a body only for non-obvious rationale, breaking changes, or distinct
sub-changes. Use a semicolon only for two tightly related clauses and
-bullets for distinct points. - Use no sentence-ending periods. Keep body prose lowercase too, except proper names, acronyms, identifiers, filenames, and versions.
- Include ticket IDs only when supplied, explicitly requested, or required.
Personal pull request style
Use the required repository template when present. Otherwise use the commit
subject style for the title and ## Summary with concise bullets. Generated
titles and body bullets follow the personal commit casing and punctuation
rules. Read
references/pull-requests.md for any PR drafting
or mutation.
Personal branch style
feature/<topic>for a new capability or meaningful behaviorfix/<topic>for a defect, regression, or incorrect behaviorchore/<topic>for dependencies, tooling, CI, configuration, documentation, tests, or behavior-preserving refactors
Use a meaningful lowercase kebab-case topic of roughly two to six words. Do not invent ticket IDs. An exact valid branch name supplied by the user wins.
Complex flows and safety
Read references/complex-flows.md only for branch
creation, detached HEAD or an in-progress Git operation, named
synchronization, multiple commits, ambiguous scope, preview/pause state
binding, failures, recovery, rewrite/force operations, or other materially
complex finalization.
Unless the user explicitly requests the exact risky action after the risk is
known, never stage a suspected secret, bypass hooks or signing (--no-verify,
--no-gpg-sign, or disabling signing), rewrite published history, force-push,
discard work, or delete branches. A non-fast-forward push never authorizes an
automatic pull, merge, rebase, or force-push. Preserve verified state on
failure.
Treat .env*, credentials, keys, tokens, signing material, and unexpectedly
large or generated artifacts as scope hazards. Inspect them without printing
secret values, and ask before staging a suspected secret.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

