agentleFS
evgenyvinnikevgenyvinnik/llm-driven-system-design/dashboarding/CLAUDE.md

llm-driven-system-design / dashboarding

CLAUDE.md60 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

A metrics monitoring and visualization system in the Datadog/Grafana mold: ingest time-series points, store them efficiently, query them by arbitrary time range with server-side aggregation, render them in configurable dashboard panels, and evaluate alert rules on a schedule. The core hard problem is the write-heavy ingestion path (many points/second) coexisting with read queries over huge time ranges — the two want opposite storage optimizations, which is exactly what a time-series database with hypertables is built to reconcile. Learning goals: time-series…

We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Rollups: should the two continuous aggregates be added to init.sql (making selectTable correct), or should selectTable collapse to …

    line 53

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 25,680 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
CLAUDE.md

Dashboarding System — Development with Claude

Project Context

A metrics monitoring and visualization system in the Datadog/Grafana mold: ingest time-series points, store them efficiently, query them by arbitrary time range with server-side aggregation, render them in configurable dashboard panels, and evaluate alert rules on a schedule. The core hard problem is the write-heavy ingestion path (many points/second) coexisting with read queries over huge time ranges — the two want opposite storage optimizations, which is exactly what a time-series database with hypertables is built to reconcile.

Learning goals: time-series storage with TimescaleDB hypertables + retention, multi-tier caching of metric identity on the hot ingest path, time-range-aware query routing, cache-aside for dashboard reads, and periodic alert evaluation with fire/resolve state.

Architecture at a Glance (what actually runs)

Two backing services run by default; a third is defined but gated off. This matches docker-compose.yml and backend/package.json:

StoreClient libRoleWhy this one
TimescaleDB (Postgres 16 + timescaledb)pgEverything: metrics hypertable (1-day chunks, 7-day retention), plus metric definitions, dashboards, panels, alert rules/instances, usersOne SQL database for time-series and metadata — dashboards can join against alert rules with no cross-store coordination; time_bucket() does aggregation in the DB
Valkey (Redis)ioredis + connect-redisSession store, query-result cache-aside (TTL by range), and the shared tier of the metric-ID cacheSub-ms lookups; shared across API instances so the metric-ID cache and sessions survive horizontal scaling
Kafka + Zookeeperkafkajs (dependency present)Not wired in. Defined in docker-compose behind a kafka compose profile; no backend/src file imports kafkajsKept as the documented production ingestion-queue path; local ingestion writes directly to the DB

The backend is a single Express app (default port 3000; dev:server1/2/3 on 3001–3003), routes: auth, metrics, dashboards, alerts. A background alert evaluator loop runs in-process every 30s (startAlertEvaluator(30) in index.ts). Frontend: React 19 + TanStack Router + Zustand + Recharts (line/area/bar + gauge + stat panels) + date-fns; dashboards poll (panels 10s, alerts 30s) rather than using WebSockets.

Key Design Decisions

1. TimescaleDB (single DB) over InfluxDB or a Postgres+separate-TSDB split

Metrics live in a hypertable; dashboards/alerts/users are plain relational tables in the same instance. The payoff is no cross-database coordination — an alert rule references a metric_name and the evaluator joins it to metric data in one query. Trade-off given up: a purpose-built TSDB (InfluxDB) or columnar store would push higher ingestion ceilings, but at the cost of a second datastore to operate and a second query language. For this scale, SQL + hypertables wins on simplicity.

2. Direct-write ingestion, not a Kafka queue (locally)

POST /metrics/ingest resolves each point's metric_id, then batch-inserts all points in a single unnest(...) statement wrapped in a circuit breaker. The production-ideal design puts Kafka between the API and the DB for buffering and partitioned consumers — that's why kafkajs and a kafka compose profile exist — but it is deliberately not wired in. Trade-off: a burst that outpaces the DB has no queue to absorb it; acceptable at local volume, and the direct path removes an entire moving part.

3. Three-tier metric-ID cache on the ingest hot path

Every point carries a (name, tags) identity that must map to an integer metric_id. Resolving that against the DB per point would dominate ingest cost, so getOrCreateMetricId checks an in-process Map, then Redis (1h TTL), then upserts into metric_definitions with ON CONFLICT. Trade-off: the in-process Map can go stale if definitions are mutated out-of-band (there's a clearMetricIdCache() for that), and it duplicates state across instances — but metric identity is effectively immutable, so staleness is a non-issue in practice.

4. Time-range-aware query routing + range-tuned cache TTL

queryService.selectTable() picks the data source by requested span, and cached query results get a short TTL for recent windows (near-real-time) and a long TTL for historical windows (immutable past). Reasoning: a 7-day dashboard should never scan raw per-second rows, and historical results never change so they can cache for minutes. Caveat (see Iteration log): the rollup tables the router selects for long ranges are not actually created locally.

5. Session auth, admin-gated user creation

Sessions in Redis (bcrypt, connect-redis, DISABLE_REDIS=true falls back to an in-memory store for Redis-less dev). POST /auth/register is guarded by requireRole('admin'). Trade-off: this is the right production posture (only admins provision accounts) but creates a first-user bootstrap gap locally — see Open Questions.

Current State

Implemented and working: metric ingestion with three-tier ID caching and batch unnest insert; time-bucketed query API with Redis cache-aside and circuit-breaker protection; latest-value and min/max/avg/count stat queries; metric/tag discovery endpoints (names, tag keys, tag values via JSONB); dashboard + panel CRUD with JSONB layout/position; alert rule CRUD and an in-process evaluator (every 30s) that fires and resolves alert_instances; Recharts-based panels (line, area, bar, gauge, stat) with a time-range selector; polling-based refresh. Production hardening present: helmet, response compression, Opossum circuit breakers (ingest + query), prom-client metrics (incl. live DB-pool gauges), Pino structured logging, health/liveness endpoints, graceful shutdown, and Zod request validation.

Intentionally not built (documented as production extensions): Kafka-buffered ingestion with worker cluster, TimescaleDB continuous-aggregate rollups, WebSocket sub-second updates, multi-node/sharded storage, OAuth/OIDC, anomaly-detection alerting, and drag-and-drop panel layout editing.

Iteration & Repair Log

  • Doc drift corrected (2026-07): the previous CLAUDE.md was a generic "Phase 3/4 Not started" checklist that contradicted the code — it listed "Add user authentication" and "Implement retention policies" as to-do when both are implemented (session auth in routes/auth.ts; add_retention_policy('metrics', INTERVAL '7 days') in init.sql). Replaced with real decision/state history.
  • README migration step was broken (fixed in README): the README told users to run npm run db:migrate, but no such script exists — the schema is applied by TimescaleDB's docker-entrypoint-initdb.d mount of init.sql on first boot. The step also claimed it creates "hourly and daily rollup tables," which it does not. Corrected to describe the initdb mount and the missing rollups.
  • Rollup tables referenced but never created (documented, code left as-is): queryService.selectTable() routes ranges > 6h to metrics_hourly / metrics_daily, but no continuous aggregates create those tables. The query's circuit breaker catches the "relation does not exist" error and returns an empty result rather than crashing, so long-range panels render empty. Seed data spans one hour, so the raw-table path is what actually exercises. Flagged in architecture.md (Query Routing Logic) and README; materializing the aggregates is the first hardening step.

Open Questions

  1. First-user bootstrap: register requires an existing admin and the seed script creates no users. What's the intended path — a seeded admin, an env-driven bootstrap account, or a one-time open-registration flag?
  2. Rollups: should the two continuous aggregates be added to init.sql (making selectTable correct), or should selectTable collapse to always-raw until they exist? The current state silently returns empty for long ranges.
  3. Cardinality: metric_definitions is UNIQUE(name, tags); a high-cardinality tag (e.g., request ID) would explode the definition table and the metric-ID caches. Where should cardinality limits be enforced — ingest validation or a definition-count guard?
  4. Ingestion backpressure: with direct DB writes, what's the trigger to actually turn on the Kafka path — sustained ingest latency, or DB-pool saturation on the circuit breaker?

Resources

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.