agentleFS
every-appevery-app/open-seo/.agents/skills/takeover/SKILL.md

takeover

Skill27k starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Take over a public (every-app/open-seo) PR, or a branch or agent thread, and finish it in the private repo while keeping the original contributors' credit in the merged commit. Use when the user asks to take over, finish, adopt, or land someone else's PR, or when triage decides a contributor's PR should ship.

7 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about every-app/open-seo

The biggest 5 of 95 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 95

Talked about on GitHub, YouTube, Bluesky and the web (95 times).

On GitHub · 50

45 more on GitHub

On YouTube · 21

16 more on YouTube

On Bluesky · 19

14 more on Bluesky

On the web · 5

Used with

Projects with it also use leaving-pr-comments, modernize and 5 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • scottwaterSkill

    leaving-pr-comments

    Format comments an agent posts on GitHub on the user's behalf. Use whenever leaving a PR comment, review comment, or reply.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • scottwaterSkill

    modernize

    Rebase an aging PR onto its current base and decide whether it should be modernized, reworked, or closed. Use when asked to rebase, update, or modernize an old PR.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Nexus-Organization-InfosecSkill

    full-stop

    Shut down the Full Control phone-bridge completely — end Claude's watch loop, stop the bridge server (server.py started via ensure_server.ps1), and mark Claude offline in the app. Use whenever the user invokes /full-stop or says "stop full control", "stop the watch loop", "shut down the bridge/server", or "stop the ps1". Counterpart of [[full-control]], which starts everything.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • shhacSkill

    full-send

    Complete an explicitly assigned task autonomously through parallel agents, peer-reviewed decisions, and automatic retries of temporary blockers. Use only when the user explicitly invokes Full Send.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • owidSkill

    babysit-pr

    Spawn a background agent that babysits an open PR — triggers a Codex review, watches CI, judges and fixes valid findings, replies to and resolves review threads, and loops to a cap. Never merges. Trigger when the user asks to "babysit the PR", "ask for codex review(s) and watch CI", or after pushing a substantial chunk to a PR branch.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    council

    Convene the persona panel — six orthogonal review lenses — on a target. Cold independent fan-out, debate-to-consensus, synthesized verdict with recorded dissent and a roster manifest.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +1 more from scottwater

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the PR, its review comments, the linked issue, and any later corrections from the maintainer.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Treat the handoff as context, not proof.

    line 13
  3. Very specific:

    Check whether main already fixed it (git log origin/main -S<symbol>, recent commits touching the same files).

    line 14
  4. Very specific:

    Keep their commits. Their authorship is the credit: when the private PR is squashed, GitHub adds every commit author on the branch as …

    line 26
  5. Distinctive:

    Put your fixes in separate commits on top.

    line 27
  6. Distinctive:

    If you replace their code rather than build on it, or several PRs fixed the same thing, add a commit whose message ends with a trailer per …

    line 28
  7. Distinctive:

    Only credit people whose work actually shaped what ships.

    line 35
  8. Distinctive:

    Never merge, and never close or comment on the public PR, without the maintainer's go.

    line 45
  9. Very specific:

    After the maintainer merges and public main has synced, with their go, comment on the public PR in two or three sentences: thank them, link …

    line 49

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Finish the original goal and keep the contributor's name on it. Don't defend their implementation just because it exists, and don't throw it away just because you'd have written it differently.

Read it

  • Read the PR, its review comments, the linked issue, and any later corrections from the maintainer.
  • Treat the handoff as context, not proof. Reproduce the bug or confirm the need yourself. If the user problem isn't real, stop and say so.
  • Check whether main already fixed it (git log origin/main -S<symbol>, recent commits touching the same files). If it did, skip to "Close the loop" and credit them anyway when their PR shaped the fix.

Bring it in

Public PRs come from forks. Read the build-executable surface before you install or run anything: package.json, the lockfile, vite.config*, scripts/, patches/, .npmrc (see "Public-mirror PRs" in docs/maintainers/preview-deployments.md).

git fetch https://github.com/every-app/open-seo.git pull/<n>/head
git checkout -b takeover-<n> FETCH_HEAD
git merge origin/main   # or rebase if their history is a mess
  • Keep their commits. Their authorship is the credit: when the private PR is squashed, GitHub adds every commit author on the branch as Co-authored-by.
  • Put your fixes in separate commits on top.
  • If you replace their code rather than build on it, or several PRs fixed the same thing, add a commit whose message ends with a trailer per contributor. Use their verified noreply address, never a guessed email:

    id=$(gh api users/<login> --jq .id)
    # Co-authored-by: <Name or login> <$id+<login>@users.noreply.github.com>
  • Only credit people whose work actually shaped what ships.

Finish it

Then follow merge-ready: simplify, verify the real failure (not just green mocks), get pnpm ci:check and pnpm test passing, and open the private PR. In the description:

  • First line: Takes over every-app/open-seo#<n> by @<login>. (one line per PR if several).
  • Say what you kept, what you changed, and why.
  • Under Extra context, list the expected Co-authored-by lines so the maintainer can check them in the squash dialog before merging.

Never merge, and never close or comment on the public PR, without the maintainer's go.

Close the loop

After the maintainer merges and public main has synced, with their go, comment on the public PR in two or three sentences: thank them, link the commit on every-app/open-seo, and say briefly what changed from their version and why. Then close it.

Report

What you inherited, what you changed, how you verified it, who is credited and how, and any decision left for the maintainer.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.