agentleFS
everrunseverruns/bashkit/.agents/skills/maintain/SKILL.md

maintain

Skill325 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub

Analyze, fix, validate, and ship Bashkit maintenance through green CI and merge. Trigger on run maintenance, maintain, maintainace, or maintaiance; use analysis-only mode only when explicitly requested.

20 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use release.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    release

    Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks to cut/publish a Huabu desktop release or tag a version. Performs an outward action — bumps the version in apps/desktop/package.json, commits + annotated-tags vX.Y.Z, and pushes the branch + tag. That tag push auto-builds the macOS/Windows installers and publishes a GitHub Release. Provides `status`, `bump`, `tag-push`, and a one-command `run` (bump → tag-push).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read knowledge/operations/maintenance.md in the Bashkit checkout and execute its checklist, then use the repository's ship skill.

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep findings in the active pass and fix root causes.

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    Use a suitable environment for platform-specific checks.

    line 21
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not create deferral issues instead of completing maintenance unless the user explicitly requests a deferred scope or a genuine external …

    line 38
  5. Distinctive:

    Only stop for an actual missing permission, unavailable dependency/service, or user decision that cannot be resolved within the authorized …

    line 40

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Bashkit maintenance

A request to run maintenance authorizes the full outcome: analyze the repository, fix findings, validate, push, open a PR, resolve review/CI failures, and squash-merge when every required check is green. A local commit or a list of follow-up issues is not completion. Explicit analysis-only requests omit edits and shipping.

Read knowledge/operations/maintenance.md in the Bashkit checkout and execute its checklist, then use the repository's ship skill. Sync from latest origin/main before editing. Use parallel agents for independent reviews and fixes when useful.

Keep findings in the active pass and fix root causes. A large diff, missing audit, failed local check, or long build is work to complete, not a reason to defer. Use a suitable environment for platform-specific checks. Never weaken tests, security limits, or supply-chain criteria to ship an upgrade. If the newest upstream version cannot preserve a required security contract, establish the incompatibility, retain the newest safe version with a tested/documented pin, and complete the rest of the pass; do not replace security checks with weaker ones.

Audit CI, not just its results. A green run says nothing about what the workflow definition hands to the code it executes, so each pass reviews .github/workflows/ against the Workflow Credential Audit in knowledge/operations/maintenance.md: checkout credentials persisted only where a git/gh call authenticates with them and never in a pull-request-triggered job, a top-level permissions block on every workflow, runtime-fetched secrets masked before they travel and never routed through $GITHUB_ENV, broad tokens confined to steps that run no repository code, no pull_request_target/workflow_run/issue_comment triggers, and no untrusted ${{ github.event.* }} interpolation inside a run: block. Treat a finding here as a fix in this pass; scripts/tests/test_ci_supply_chain.py holds the regressions.

Do not create deferral issues instead of completing maintenance unless the user explicitly requests a deferred scope or a genuine external blocker requires it. Only stop for an actual missing permission, unavailable dependency/service, or user decision that cannot be resolved within the authorized task. Report concrete evidence and continue independent work. CI failures require diagnosis and fixes; never merge red CI or claim success while a required check is unfinished.

The final response identifies the merged PR, key fixes, verification, and any explicitly accepted upstream constraints. Keep the spec's pass record factual.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.