maintain
Skill325 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub
Analyze, fix, validate, and ship Bashkit maintenance through green CI and merge. Trigger on run maintenance, maintain, maintainace, or maintaiance; use analysis-only mode only when explicitly requested.
20 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- inoio/agents-sandboxtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- srinator22/New-Projecttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- devantler-tech/ksailtheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- jamesm-dev/tateru.devtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- exmergo/dextheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
- constant-itis/mycelium-memorytheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use release.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillrelease
Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks to cut/publish a Huabu desktop release or tag a version. Performs an outward action — bumps the version in apps/desktop/package.json, commits + annotated-tags vX.Y.Z, and pushes the branch + tag. That tag push auto-builds the macOS/Windows installers and publishes a GitHub Release. Provides `status`, `bump`, `tag-push`, and a one-command `run` (bump → tag-push).
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions20 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 20
- garrytan/gbrain★ 32ksame name
- slopus/happy★ 25ksame name
- PhilipK/BoilR★ 1.9ksame name
- GlassHaven/Haven★ 1.4ksame name
- GlassOnTin/Haven★ 1.4ksame name
- iovisor/ubpf★ 996same name
- devantler-tech/ksail★ 164same name
- exmergo/dex★ 116same name
- inoio/agents-sandbox★ 84same name
- Altman-conquer/agentrejoin★ 75same name
10 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .deepsec/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- process-issuesSkill
- shipSkill
- bashkitSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Read knowledge/operations/maintenance.md in the Bashkit checkout and execute its checklist, then use the repository's ship skill.
- Distinctive: line 19
Keep findings in the active pass and fix root causes.
- Distinctive: line 21
Use a suitable environment for platform-specific checks.
- Distinctive: line 38
Do not create deferral issues instead of completing maintenance unless the user explicitly requests a deferred scope or a genuine external …
- Distinctive: line 40
Only stop for an actual missing permission, unavailable dependency/service, or user decision that cannot be resolved within the authorized …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Bashkit maintenance
A request to run maintenance authorizes the full outcome: analyze the repository, fix findings, validate, push, open a PR, resolve review/CI failures, and squash-merge when every required check is green. A local commit or a list of follow-up issues is not completion. Explicit analysis-only requests omit edits and shipping.
Read knowledge/operations/maintenance.md in the Bashkit checkout and execute its
checklist, then use the repository's ship skill. Sync from latest origin/main
before editing. Use parallel agents for independent reviews and fixes when useful.
Keep findings in the active pass and fix root causes. A large diff, missing audit, failed local check, or long build is work to complete, not a reason to defer. Use a suitable environment for platform-specific checks. Never weaken tests, security limits, or supply-chain criteria to ship an upgrade. If the newest upstream version cannot preserve a required security contract, establish the incompatibility, retain the newest safe version with a tested/documented pin, and complete the rest of the pass; do not replace security checks with weaker ones.
Audit CI, not just its results. A green run says nothing about what the workflow
definition hands to the code it executes, so each pass reviews .github/workflows/
against the Workflow Credential Audit in knowledge/operations/maintenance.md:
checkout credentials persisted only where a git/gh call authenticates with them
and never in a pull-request-triggered job, a top-level permissions block on every
workflow, runtime-fetched secrets masked before they travel and never routed through
$GITHUB_ENV, broad tokens confined to steps that run no repository code, no
pull_request_target/workflow_run/issue_comment triggers, and no untrusted
${{ github.event.* }} interpolation inside a run: block. Treat a finding here
as a fix in this pass; scripts/tests/test_ci_supply_chain.py holds the regressions.
Do not create deferral issues instead of completing maintenance unless the user explicitly requests a deferred scope or a genuine external blocker requires it. Only stop for an actual missing permission, unavailable dependency/service, or user decision that cannot be resolved within the authorized task. Report concrete evidence and continue independent work. CI failures require diagnosis and fixes; never merge red CI or claim success while a required check is unfinished.
The final response identifies the merged PR, key fixes, verification, and any explicitly accepted upstream constraints. Keep the spec's pass record factual.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

