agentleFS
ertugrul-dmrertugrul-dmr/clean-code-skills/skills/typescript/clean-tests/SKILL.md

clean-tests

Skill193 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when writing, fixing, editing, or refactoring TypeScript tests. Enforces Clean Code principles—fast tests, boundary coverage, one assert per test.

2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Test everything that could possibly break.

    line 12
  2. Very specific:

    Don't use test.skip to hide problems.

    line 59
  3. Distinctive:

    When you find a bug, write tests for all similar cases.

    line 99
  4. Distinctive:

    When tests fail, look for patterns.

    line 115
  5. Distinctive:

    Look at which code paths are untested.

    line 124

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Clean Tests

T1: Insufficient Tests

Test everything that could possibly break. Use coverage tools as a guide, not a goal.

// Bad - only tests happy path
test("divide", () => {
  expect(divide(10, 2)).toBe(5);
});

// Good - tests edge cases too
test("divide normal", () => {
  expect(divide(10, 2)).toBe(5);
});

test("divide by zero", () => {
  expect(() => divide(10, 0)).toThrow(RangeError);
});

test("divide negative", () => {
  expect(divide(-10, 2)).toBe(-5);
});

T2: Use a Coverage Tool

Coverage tools report gaps in your testing strategy. Don't ignore them.

# Run with coverage
vitest run --coverage

# Aim for meaningful coverage, not 100%

T3: Don't Skip Trivial Tests

Trivial tests document behavior and catch regressions. They're worth more than their cost.

// Worth having - documents expected behavior
test("user default role", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice");
  expect(user.role).toBe("member");
});

T4: An Ignored Test Is a Question About an Ambiguity

Don't use test.skip to hide problems. Either fix the test or delete it.

// Bad - hiding a problem
test.skip("async operation", () => {
  // flaky, fix later
});

// Good - either fix it or document why it's skipped
test.skip("cache invalidation - requires Redis (see CONTRIBUTING.md)", () => {
});

T5: Test Boundary Conditions

Bugs congregate at boundaries. Test them explicitly.

test("pagination boundaries", () => {
  const items = Array.from({ length: 100 }, (_, i) => i);

  // First page
  expect(paginate(items, 1, 10)).toEqual(items.slice(0, 10));

  // Last page
  expect(paginate(items, 10, 10)).toEqual(items.slice(90, 100));

  // Beyond last page
  expect(paginate(items, 11, 10)).toEqual([]);

  // Page zero (invalid)
  expect(() => paginate(items, 0, 10)).toThrow(RangeError);

  // Empty list
  expect(paginate([], 1, 10)).toEqual([]);
});

T6: Exhaustively Test Near Bugs

When you find a bug, write tests for all similar cases. Bugs cluster.

// Found bug: off-by-one in date calculation
// Now test ALL date boundaries
test("month boundaries", () => {
  expect(lastDayOfMonth(2024, 1)).toBe(31); // January
  expect(lastDayOfMonth(2024, 2)).toBe(29); // Leap year February
  expect(lastDayOfMonth(2023, 2)).toBe(28); // Non-leap February
  expect(lastDayOfMonth(2024, 4)).toBe(30); // 30-day month
  expect(lastDayOfMonth(2024, 12)).toBe(31); // December
});

T7: Patterns of Failure Are Revealing

When tests fail, look for patterns. They often point to deeper issues.

// If all async tests fail intermittently,
// the problem isn't the tests—it's the async handling

T8: Test Coverage Patterns Can Be Revealing

Look at which code paths are untested. Often they reveal design problems.

// If you can't easily test a function, it probably does too much
// Refactor for testability

T9: Tests Should Be Fast

Slow tests don't get run. Keep unit tests under 100ms each.

// Bad - hits real database
test("user creation", async () => {
  const db = await connectToDatabase(); // Slow!
  const user = await db.createUser("Alice");
  expect(user.name).toBe("Alice");
});

// Good - uses mock or in-memory
test("user creation", async () => {
  const db = new InMemoryDatabase();
  const user = await db.createUser("Alice");
  expect(user.name).toBe("Alice");
});

Test Organization

F.I.R.S.T. Principles

  • Fast: Tests should run quickly
  • Independent: Tests shouldn't depend on each other
  • Repeatable: Same result every time, any environment
  • Self-Validating: Pass or fail, no manual inspection
  • Timely: Written before or with the code, not after

One Concept Per Test

// Bad - testing multiple things
test("user", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice", "alice@example.com");
  expect(user.name).toBe("Alice");
  expect(user.email).toBe("alice@example.com");
  expect(user.isValid()).toBe(true);
  user.activate();
  expect(user.isActive).toBe(true);
});

// Good - one concept each
test("user stores name", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice", "alice@example.com");
  expect(user.name).toBe("Alice");
});

test("user stores email", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice", "alice@example.com");
  expect(user.email).toBe("alice@example.com");
});

test("new user is valid", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice", "alice@example.com");
  expect(user.isValid()).toBe(true);
});

test("user can be activated", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice", "alice@example.com");
  user.activate();
  expect(user.isActive).toBe(true);
});

Quick Reference

RulePrinciple
T1Test everything that could break
T2Use coverage tools
T3Don't skip trivial tests
T4Ignored test = ambiguity question
T5Test boundary conditions
T6Exhaustively test near bugs
T7Look for patterns in failures
T8Check coverage when debugging
T9Tests must be fast (<100ms)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.