agentleFS
erraggyerraggy/oastools/.claude/skills/gen-test/SKILL.md

gen-test

Skill7 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generate test scaffolding for a Go file following oastools conventions. Usage: /gen-test <file.go> [function names...]

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions2 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 2

    1. meshery/meshery★ 12ksame name
    2. mean-weasel/bullhorn★ 4same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the specified file and identify:

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Look for existing test patterns in the same package:

    line 35
  3. Distinctive:

    Read 1-2 existing test files to understand:

    line 43
  4. Very specific:

    Test helper usage (testutil, require, assert)

    line 46
  5. Very specific:

    Create or append to the *_test.go file following these conventions:

    line 52
  6. Very specific:

    Table-driven tests: Use tests := []struct{...} pattern

    line 57
  7. Distinctive:

    Descriptive names: Test case names should describe the scenario

    line 59
  8. Very specific:

    testutil helpers: Use testutil.LoadSpec() for loading OAS fixtures

    line 60
  9. Distinctive:

    Always include test cases for:

    line 123
  10. Distinctive:

    After generating, verify the tests compile:

    line 132
  11. Very specific:

    Run the tests (go test -v ./path/to/package -run TestName)

    line 142
  12. Distinctive:

    Add more test cases

    line 143

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

gen-test

Generate test scaffolding for Go files following oastools testing conventions.

Usage:

  • /gen-test parser/resolver.go - Generate tests for all exported functions
  • /gen-test validator/validate.go ValidateSpec - Generate test for specific function

Step 1: Analyze Target File

Read the specified file and identify:

  1. Package name
  2. Exported functions/methods to test
  3. Existing test file (if any)
  4. Dependencies and types used

Note: In the commands below, $FILE refers to the path provided by the user when invoking the skill. For example, if the user runs /gen-test parser/resolver.go, then $FILE = parser/resolver.go.

# Check if test file already exists
# Example: parser/resolver.go -> parser/resolver_test.go
ls -la "${FILE%%.go}_test.go" 2>/dev/null

Step 2: Find Testing Patterns

Look for existing test patterns in the same package:

# Find existing tests in the package
# Example: parser/resolver.go -> parser/*_test.go
ls -la $(dirname "$FILE")/*_test.go 2>/dev/null | head -5

Read 1-2 existing test files to understand:

  • Table-driven test patterns used
  • Test helper usage (testutil, require, assert)
  • Fixture/testdata patterns
  • Subtests structure

Step 3: Generate Test Scaffolding

Create or append to the *_test.go file following these conventions:

oastools Testing Conventions

  1. Use testify: github.com/stretchr/testify/require and assert
  2. Table-driven tests: Use tests := []struct{...} pattern
  3. Subtests: Use t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {...})
  4. Descriptive names: Test case names should describe the scenario
  5. testutil helpers: Use testutil.LoadSpec() for loading OAS fixtures

Template Structure

func TestFunctionName(t *testing.T) {
	tests := []struct {
		name    string
		input   InputType
		want    OutputType
		wantErr bool
	}{
		{
			name:  "valid input returns expected output",
			input: validInput,
			want:  expectedOutput,
		},
		{
			name:    "invalid input returns error",
			input:   invalidInput,
			wantErr: true,
		},
	}

	for _, tt := range tests {
		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
			got, err := FunctionName(tt.input)
			if tt.wantErr {
				require.Error(t, err)
				return
			}
			require.NoError(t, err)
			assert.Equal(t, tt.want, got)
		})
	}
}

For Methods on Types

func TestTypeName_MethodName(t *testing.T) {
	// Setup
	obj := NewTypeName(...)

	// Test cases
	tests := []struct {
		name string
		// ...
	}{
		// ...
	}

	for _, tt := range tests {
		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
			// ...
		})
	}
}

Step 4: Add Edge Cases

Always include test cases for:

  • ✅ Happy path (valid input)
  • ❌ Error cases (invalid input)
  • 🔲 Nil/empty inputs
  • 🔄 Boundary conditions

Step 5: Verify Tests Compile

After generating, verify the tests compile:

go test -c ./path/to/package

Step 6: Summary

Present the generated test scaffolding and ask if the user wants to:

  1. Run the tests (go test -v ./path/to/package -run TestName)
  2. Add more test cases
  3. Generate tests for additional functions

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.