deliverable-check
Skill3 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use before any client-facing or stakeholder-facing deliverable ships (report, email draft, Jira/Slack post, doc) - lints for metaspeak (references to prior drafts, revisions, feedback, the writing process), em/en dashes, and the "isn't just" trope. Triggers on "check this before I send it", "lint the report", "is this clean", or /deliverable-check <file>.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- advanced-prompt-improverSkill
- codex-gateSkill
- codex-web-renderSkill
- freeing-disk-spaceSkill
- gmail-draftSkill
- codexSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Run the linter on the deliverable file(s).
- Distinctive: line 25
Only then present, post, or send the deliverable.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Deliverable Check
Deliverables must read as standalone artifacts written by a fresh author. This skill makes that rule mechanical instead of remembered.
Usage
python3 ~/.claude/skills/deliverable-check/scripts/lint.py <file> [<file> ...]Exit 0 clean, 1 findings (printed as file:line: [rule] text), 2 read error.
Workflow
- Run the linter on the deliverable file(s).
- Fix every finding by rewriting the sentence as if no prior version ever existed. Do not delete content the reader needs; restate it standalone.
- Re-run until clean.
- Only then present, post, or send the deliverable.
What it catches
- Metaspeak: "as discussed", "per your feedback", "updated to reflect", "previous draft", "I've revised", "now includes", and similar references to drafts, revisions, reviewers, or process.
- Em and en dashes (house style bans them).
- The "isn't just X, it's Y" trope.
Limits
The regex list is a floor, not a ceiling. After a clean lint, do one human-eye
pass for subtler process references the patterns cannot catch (for example a
paragraph that only makes sense if the reader saw an earlier version). Add any
new offender you meet to scripts/lint.py in the same turn.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

