agentleFS
emcie-coemcie-co/parlant/AGENTS.md

parlant

AGENTS.md18k starsChanged 22 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

This is the main repo of Parlant (https://parlant.io). Parlant is a vibe-coding platform for chat agents that talk to customers. Someone describes how their agent should behave, and their coding agent implements it against Parlant's Python SDK. Parlant provides the rest: an engine that keeps the agent on those rules in every conversation, plus the parts every customer-facing agent needs — a chat widget, human handoff, testing and hosting. Three things follow from that, and they apply to every change…

Trending

Steady talk.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 2 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 0 mentionsMar 2026: 1 mentionApr 2026: 1 mentionMay 2026: 1 mentionJun 2026: 1 mentionJul 2026: 1 mentionAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 1 mentionOct 2026: 1 mentionNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the emcie-co/parlant repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Who's talking about emcie-co/parlant

The biggest 5 of 28 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 28

Talked about on GitHub, YouTube and Bluesky (28 times).

On GitHub · 15

10 more on GitHub

On YouTube · 9

4 more on YouTube

On Bluesky · 4

  • Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.

    Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,774 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.

  • In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Always ensure you stick to Hexagonal Architecture patterns in line with how they're used in this codebase.

    line 23
  2. Distinctive:

    Every time you add something, look for similar things in the codebase and ensure you follow the coding style.

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    If you need to add a test for something, first say where you plan to add it and ask for confirmation.

    line 26
  4. Very specific:

    If you need to test classes/methods in sdk.py (or generally to test things that relate to engine behavior) make sure you inherit from …

    line 29
  5. Distinctive:

    Test names should go "test*that*..." using clear names that explain the context, what is executed, and what is the expected result.

    line 30
  6. Distinctive:

    Always follow this plan when asked to code a feature or fix a bug:

    line 33
  7. Distinctive:

    Consider the codebase's structure

    line 35
  8. Distinctive:

    Ask for plan confirmation.

    line 40
  9. Distinctive:

    Make sure to format all of the files you changed using ruff (it is installed in the environment).

    line 44
  10. Very specific:

    Run uv run python scripts/lint.py --mypy --ruff to ensure your code has no lint issues.

    line 45

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

This is the main repo of Parlant (https://parlant.io).

Parlant is a vibe-coding platform for chat agents that talk to customers. Someone describes how their agent should behave, and their coding agent implements it against Parlant's Python SDK. Parlant provides the rest: an engine that keeps the agent on those rules in every conversation, plus the parts every customer-facing agent needs — a chat widget, human handoff, testing and hosting.

Three things follow from that, and they apply to every change you make here:

  1. Agents built on Parlant must stay compliant and controlled. A rule the engine can quietly drop is a bug, not a tuning problem.
  2. Conversational management is meant to come out of the box. If a capability only works when the integrator writes glue code around it, it isn't finished.
  3. It has to support enterprise, large-scale use cases, where SLAs, stability and security are paramount. That is a bar every change has to clear, not the audience Parlant is built around.

Most people reach Parlant through their coding agent rather than by typing calls themselves. That agent cannot ask what a flag does or what an error was getting at — it reads the docstring, the --help text and the error string, and acts on them. Write those as part of the API: say what to do next, not only what went wrong.

The repo's structure follows the Hexagonal Architecture (Ports and Adapters) approach.

  • src/parlant
    • core: Core framework code
    • adapters: Implementations of interfaces using 3rd party tools
    • api: REST API layer using FastAPI. Uses modules from core/
  • tests: all tests for the project. Structure strives to mirror that which is under src/parlant.

General Coding Instructions:

  • Always ensure you stick to Hexagonal Architecture patterns in line with how they're used in this codebase.
  • Every time you add something, look for similar things in the codebase and ensure you follow the coding style.
  • We use MyPy on strict mode. Every parameter needs to be type-annotated. Every function's result too.
  • If you need to add a test for something, first say where you plan to add it and ask for confirmation.
  • We follow TDD. When you make a change, first create a failing test. Once it fails, implement just enough so it passes.
  • We avoid the mock-ist approach to testing. We follow classical TDD as much as possible, unless to avoid very slow tests in particular component tests... SDK tests never use mocks. Other tests may mock specific LLM or embedding requests, especially to generate edge-cases deterministically. Otherwise, we always follow classical testing by integrating real components. This makes for a more stable and robust test suite.
  • If you need to test classes/methods in sdk.py (or generally to test things that relate to engine behavior) make sure you inherit from SDKTest and understand how it works and how to use it.
  • Test names should go "testthat..." using clear names that explain the context, what is executed, and what is the expected result.
  • You can run tests using pytest. Make sure you run "uv run pytest tests/path/to/test/file.py" while also specifying the test name that you need to run.

Always follow this plan when asked to code a feature or fix a bug:

  1. Consider the codebase's structure
  2. Describe your implementation plan, including: a. What tests you will write (test names + files they would live in) b. Why do you think the tests would initially fail c. Where you would plan to implement the code that would make the tests pass
  3. Ask for plan confirmation. If you get feedback, revise your plan and ask for confirmation again until you get it.
  4. Implement the tests first. Ask for confirmation and code review.
  5. Once tests are approved, once again suggest your implementation plan for making them pass, and get plan review until confirmation.
  6. Once your implementation plan is confirmed, go ahead with implementing the code to pass them.
  7. Make sure to format all of the files you changed using ruff (it is installed in the environment).
  8. Run uv run python scripts/lint.py --mypy --ruff to ensure your code has no lint issues.
  9. Update CHANGELOG.md under ## [Unreleased] as part of the same commit, in the matching section (Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security). Write it for the person upgrading: what changed and what it means for them, not which files you touched. A change nobody outside this repo can observe — a refactor, a test, a comment — needs no entry.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.