agentleFS
eliphazbouyeeliphazbouye/skills/feature/SKILL.md

feature

Skill0 starsChanged 43 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Drive one feature end to end — from a fuzzy request to a merged, closed-out PR — in its own branch and git worktree (so several features can run in parallel, one session each), by chaining the other skills (scope → architect → build → review → verify → ship → land) without the user having to know which comes next. Reads the feature's state from context/ (brief, build plan, review findings, acceptance run, PR) to find the current stage, runs that stage's skill, moves on automatically, and stops only at the moments that are the user's to decide: interview answers, plan approval, unplanned decisions, which findings to fix, the manual checks, the PR text, pushes and the merge. Resumable at any point in any session. Use when the user wants to take a feature all the way, asks "what's next on this feature", or says "feature", "take it end to end", "de bout en bout", "pilote la feature", "amène-la jusqu'au merge", or "continue la feature X".

71 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use bug, bugfix and 6 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • paulocsbSkill

    bug

    Investigation playbook for fixing a bug. Walks through 5 phases: reproduce → isolate → root cause → propose fix → validate. Forces concrete reasoning with code reads, log inspection, and git blame instead of pattern-matching guesses. Use for any non-trivial defect.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • team-attentionSkill

    bugfix

    Root cause based one-shot bug fix. debugger diagnosis → requirements.md generation → /execute. /bugfix "error description" Full investigation pipeline: debugger + gap-analyzer + standard verify. QA suggestion after successful fix.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • codebycoreySkill

    adopt

    Adopt an existing plan from conversation context into delta-spec format. Use when importing a plan, adopting planning that already happened, capturing plan mode output, or bringing in prior design work.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • aegiswizardSkill

    context

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • ryu111Skill

    migration

    Migration planning expertise. Use when replacing tools/frameworks, upgrading versions, migrating databases, or planning transitions. Contains strategies, compatibility analysis methods, and rollback planning.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MetaSkill

    roadmap

    Build, continue, inspect, or visualize a source-grounded mathematical roadmap and theorem DAG in an existing Autoform Markdown blueprint. Use for source research, repository-wide inventories of existing and planned mathematics, scope, coverage, milestones, and roadmap articles; do not create repository infrastructure or prove Lean declarations.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 64 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 64 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.