speckit-aee-review
Skill4 starsChanged 55 days agoMITView on GitHub
Diff two AEE assessments into a materiality-filtered review queue
- Installs packages
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- electrohire/spec-kit-evaluatoredited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- electrohire/spec-kit-evaluator★ 396% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- speckit-aee-assessSkill
- speckit-aee-challengeSkill
- speckit-aee-draft-claimsSkill
- speckit-aee-gapsSkill
- speckit-aee-gateSkill
- speckit-aee-message-securitySkill
- speckit-aee-report-savingsSkill
- speckit-aee-route-evidenceSkill
- speckit-aee-traceSkill
- speckit-aee-verifySkill
- speckit-analyzeSkill
- speckit-checklistSkill
- speckit-clarifySkill
- speckit-constitutionSkill
- speckit-convergeSkill
- speckit-evaluator-composeSkill
- speckit-evaluator-reportSkill
- speckit-evaluator-routeSkill
- speckit-evaluator-runSkill
- speckit-implementSkill
- speckit-planSkill
- speckit-specifySkill
- speckit-tasksSkill
- speckit-taskstoissuesSkill
- spec-kit-aeeSkill
The file
Files
Aee Review Skill
AEE Review
Diff two rich AEE assessments and emit the bounded queue a reviewer actually owes attention: claims whose propagated score moved by at least the materiality threshold, policy verdict flips, and added/removed claims.
User input
$ARGUMENTSAccept previous=<path> and current=<path> (assessment JSON files, usually under .specify/extensions/aee/assessments/), optional materiality=<0..1> (default 0.05, the engine's validated hysteresis point), and optional limit=<n> top-k budget applied after sorting by movement size.
Prerequisites
- Do not install the engine yourself. The runner uses an
aeeengine in the range >=1.6.0,<2 from the active Python; otherwise its first run installsapplied-epistemic-engineering>=1.6.0,<2into.specify/extensions/aee/.runtime(this needs network access once). If the runner refuses (exit 2) because that install is disabled (SPECKIT_AEE_AUTO_INSTALL=0) or failed, stop and relay its message, which names the manualpython -m pip install "applied-epistemic-engineering>=1.6.0,<2"command. - Resolve both assessment paths inside the project root. Never follow symlinks or read outside the project root.
Execution
Run:
python .specify/extensions/aee/scripts/python/run_aee.py review --previous "<path>" --current "<path>"The runner prints the review queue as JSON. Report the moved claims (largest first, with before/after scores and bands), any verdict changes, and added/removed claims. An empty queue is a real result: it means nothing moved materially between the two assessments — say so rather than re-reviewing everything.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

