apply
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Fill a German application form - Personio, softgarden, Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, Interamt
25 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- priyansh1210/shirotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- matthewwong525/WongStacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- galiprandi/job-seekertheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- hiddenjobs/job-search-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ChadPapineau/espn-fantasy-football-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ankul5/internship-hunt-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use outreach, track and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
QuixiAISkilloutreach
Decide whether a message is worth someone's attention, then reach the user through the outbox, or people on a connected chat channel, on their behalf or your own initiative
Also in 5 projects that use this
theYahiaSkilltrack
Отследить посылку Почты России
Also in 4 projects that use this
ninehillsSkillhunt
Finds root cause before applying fixes for errors, crashes, regressions, failing tests, broken behavior, and screenshot-reported defects. Use when users report in any language errors, crashes, broken behavior, regressions, failing tests, screenshot evidence, or something that used to work and now fails. Not for code review or new features.
Also in 3 projects that use this
kstonekuanSkillDaily
Documentation and capabilities reference for Daily
Also in 3 projects that use this
julienamorganSkillprofile
Researches the user's market, competitors, and competitive positioning to build a complete ICP profile. Shows findings for user approval before proceeding. Triggers: /profile, "research my market", "who are my competitors". Reads: ./gtm/company.md, ./gtm/icp.md. Writes: updates ./gtm/icp.md with competitive positioning. Standalone: yes (asks for domain if company.md missing).
Also in 3 projects that use this
genomewalkerSkillexplore
RLM-style recursive memory exploration - dynamically navigate the memory graph
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions25 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 25
- andrew-shwetzer/career-ops-plugin★ 501same name
- andrew-shwetzer/career-ops-plugin-do-not-fork-currently-updating-v2-★ 500same name
- proficientlyjobs/proficiently-claude-skills★ 389same name
- galiprandi/job-seeker★ 120same name
- hiddenjobs/job-search-mcp★ 25same name
- 1carusalwayswa/apply★ 18same name
- kirkchen/beat★ 9same name
- iliasedelkin/jobissimo★ 8same name
- matthewwong525/WongStack★ 7same name
- qbeka/jev-job-search★ 5same name
15 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- anschreibenSkill
- evaluateSkill
- followupSkill
- interview-prepSkill
- job-searchSkill
- mappeSkill
- network-scanSkill
- patternsSkill
- setupSkill
- tailor-cvSkill
- trackerSkill
- visaSkill
- zeugnisSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 23
If there is no evaluation.md, run /wingman:evaluate first.
- Very specific: line 27
If application-data.md exists, load it.
- Very specific: line 57
Before touching the form, tell the candidate the shape of it in two lines — shared/references/interaction.md asks for this on long flows, …
- Very specific: line 83
Use read_page for the refs you interact with, and scout-form.js for what exists.
- Very specific: line 123
Ask once, fill once. Cache new answers under a Custom Answers section in application-data.md so the next application reuses them.
- Very specific: line 127
After approval, fill in one pass via scripts/fill-page.md.
- Very specific: line 143
Write applied.md in the job folder: date, ATS, language, status (Submitted / Draft), what was attached, anything left manual.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Apply
ATS patterns:
shared/references/ats.md· Interaction:shared/references/interaction.md· Work auth:shared/references/work-authorization.md
Fills application forms. Never submits. The user takes the last step, every time.
Step 0: Prerequisites
CV required. Load application-data.md if it exists (created in Step 2). Load profile.md for the German fields — Gehaltsvorstellung, Kündigungsfrist, Arbeitserlaubnis.
Step 1: Target job
- URL → match against
DATA_DIR/jobs/; loadposting.md,evaluation.md,language.md, the CV and letter. No match → fetch the posting and create the folder. last→ most recently modified job folder; confirm which job.current→ use the active tab as-is; match its URL against saved folders for context.
If there is no evaluation.md, run /wingman:evaluate first. Filling a form for an unscored job means the user may be applying to something a 30-second check would have ruled out.
Step 2: Application data
If application-data.md exists, load it. Otherwise extract what you can from the CV and profile, present it for confirmation, and save:
# Application Data
## Persönliche Daten
- Vorname / Nachname / E-Mail / Telefon
- Straße und Hausnummer / PLZ / Wohnort
- Land: Deutschland
## Profile
- LinkedIn / Xing / GitHub / Portfolio
## Standardantworten
- Wie haben Sie von uns erfahren: [board actually used]
- Bereits bei uns beworben: Nein
- Gehaltsvorstellung: [X].000 EUR brutto p. a.
- Kündigungsfrist: [from profile]
- Frühestmöglicher Eintrittstermin: [computed]
- Arbeitserlaubnis erforderlich: [from work-authorization.md — NOT US sponsorship logic]
- Aufenthaltstitel: [permit type, if held]
## Freiwillige Angaben
- Schwerbehinderung: keine AngabeNo US EEO block. German forms do not carry voluntary race/ethnicity self-identification, and importing those defaults into a German application is wrong. Schwerbehinderung is voluntary and the candidate's disclosure to make — default to no answer unless they said otherwise.
Step 2b: Say what is coming
Before touching the form, tell the candidate the shape of it in two lines — shared/references/interaction.md asks for this on long flows, and this is the longest one:
Two stops from here. First the fill plan, everything I intend to put in every field, for you to correct. Then the form itself, filled and screenshotted, for you to submit.
I do not click Submit, tick the DSGVO box, or upload a file. Those are yours.
On a multi-page wizard, say how many pages. Someone who knows there are six pages will sit through six; someone who thought there was one gives up on page three.
Step 3: Navigate and scout
Browser setup per shared/references/web-extraction.md. Detect the ATS from the URL per shared/references/ats.md.
- Personio (
*.jobs.personio.de/.com) — native single page expected. Multiple upload fields for Lebenslauf, Anschreiben and Zeugnisse; build the whole attachment set. DSGVO consent is tenant-dependent: a checkbox on some, implicit-on-submit on others (SMIGHT) — either way the candidate's action. - softgarden (
*.softgarden.io) — native. Quick-apply via LinkedIn/Xing also offered. - Lever (
jobs.lever.co) — append/apply. Most automation-friendly. - Greenhouse — extract the iframe tokens, then navigate to the direct form URL (see the reference).
- Workday / SAP SuccessFactors — account required. Tell the user to sign in themselves, then continue. Account creation is not something this tool does.
- Interamt — account required, same handling. Expect the full Mappe plus Tarif and Schwerbehinderung fields.
- Unknown — navigate, screenshot, identify. If unrecognizable, say so and ask.
Scout before filling — with the DOM, not the accessibility tree. Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tools/scout-form.js and evaluate it with javascript_tool. It returns the complete inventory: every field with its full label, which are required by label text, the select options, the upload fields, and separate consent and voluntary lists.
Do not scout with read_page alone. Measured against a Personio-shaped form, read_page(filter="interactive") returned 8 of 15 controls. The seven it dropped were every select, both file inputs, all three Schwerbehinderung radios, and the DSGVO consent checkbox — precisely the controls that must be surfaced to the user rather than answered. A scout that cannot see the consent box cannot report it, and "never tick a consent box" then holds only because nothing mentioned one was there.
Two further traps confirmed on the same form: read_page returns an empty tree until the pane has rendered, so an empty result means take a screenshot and re-read, never "this form has no fields"; and it named the date field from its TT.MM.JJJJ placeholder rather than its Verfügbar ab* (erforderlich) label, which loses the required marker.
Use read_page for the refs you interact with, and scout-form.js for what exists. Where they disagree, the DOM is right.
The German ATS notes in the reference are structural, not element-level — never assume a ref from the file.
Step 4: Generate what the form needs
- CV — always. Exists in the folder? Use it. Otherwise run the
tailor-cvworkflow inline and show it before continuing. - Anschreiben / cover letter — only if the form has a field for it. Then the
anschreibenworkflow inline. - Zeugnisse — if the form accepts attachments, use the audited set. Unaudited Zeugnis → say so and offer
/wingman:zeugnisbefore it goes out.
Step 5: Propose everything at once
Scan every field, then present one consolidated plan — never field-by-field questions:
Plan for the [Company] application ([ATS]):
From your data:
Vorname: … Nachname: … E-Mail: … Telefon: …
PLZ / Wohnort: …
German fields:
Gehaltsvorstellung: 75.000 EUR brutto p. a.
Eintrittstermin: 01.07.2026 (today + your 3-month Kündigungsfrist)
Arbeitserlaubnis erforderlich: Nein — Blaue Karte EU held
Wie haben Sie von uns erfahren: StepStone
Needs your decision:
DSGVO-Einwilligung — required to submit. This is your consent to their
data processing; I will not tick it for you.
Schwerbehinderung — voluntary. Currently: keine Angabe.
Manual upload (I cannot upload non-image files):
Lebenslauf: [path]
Anschreiben: [path]
Zeugnisse: [paths]
Approve, or tell me what to change.Ask once, fill once. Cache new answers under a Custom Answers section in application-data.md so the next application reuses them.
Step 6: Fill
After approval, fill in one pass via scripts/fill-page.md.
Never tick the DSGVO consent checkbox on the user's behalf, even with general approval of the plan — it is a specific consent action and needs its own yes. Same for any terms or arbitration checkbox.
File uploads: the browser tools can only upload images, so PDF and DOCX uploads are the user's to do. Give the exact paths in Step 5 so they can upload while reviewing.
Multi-page forms (Workday, SuccessFactors, Interamt): fill, click Save and Continue, read validation errors, fix, advance. Never click a final submit.
Step 7: Review, then stop
Screenshot the completed form. Walk through what is filled and what is still missing. Then stop and ask for explicit confirmation.
Wingman does not click Submit, Send, Absenden, „Bewerbung senden", or „Bewerbung abschicken". Not with prior approval, not when the user says "just do it", not when the form looks obviously complete. Drafting is reversible; submitting is not. The user clicks.
Step 8: Log
Write applied.md in the job folder: date, ATS, language, status (Submitted / Draft), what was attached, anything left manual. Update tracker.md per shared/references/tracker.md with the status and a follow-up date using the German timing table.
Response Format
- Status — what was filled, what needs manual upload, whether submitted
- Files — paths written
- Next — follow-up date, or the next job
Permissions
{ "permissions": { "allow": [
"Read(~/.wingman/**)", "Write(~/.wingman/**)", "Edit(~/.wingman/**)",
"mcp__claude-in-chrome__*"
] } }Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

