agentleFS
ek0212ek0212/agent-ready-repo-kit/skills/outreach-email/SKILL.md

outreach-email

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Draft, shorten, personalize, or sequence concise one-to-one outreach emails for prospects, colleagues, and clients. Use when user says "write a cold email", "draft an outreach email", "make this email shorter", "write a follow-up sequence", "book a meeting by email", or asks for a short email that earns a reply, requests review, shares an update, or opens a sales conversation.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write relevant one-to-one email with one value and one easy next reply.

    line 7
  2. Very specific:

    Use for prospecting, partnerships, colleague requests, client updates, and follow-ups.

    line 11
  3. Distinctive:

    Use one supplied or verified detail: recent event, shared connection, prior exchange, project, or public work.

    line 49
  4. Very specific:

    Write three options. Keep conversational and specific.

    line 53
  5. Distinctive:

    Ask: low-friction question answerable quickly.

    line 66
  6. Distinctive:

    Delete background, repeated value, stacked questions, filler, and oversized signature.

    line 72
  7. Distinctive:

    Default 4-6 total touches over several weeks only when relationship, policy, and applicable rules permit.

    line 76
  8. Very specific:

    Stop after decline, opt-out, wrong-recipient signal, or relationship-specific limit.

    line 78
  9. Distinctive:

    No verified hook: use honest context.

    line 82
  10. Distinctive:

    No proof: offer concrete example or remove unsupported claim.

    line 83
  11. Distinctive:

    No unsupported claims or invented detail.

    line 95
  12. Distinctive:

    Follow-ups add value and include stop condition.

    line 96
  13. Distinctive:

    Use direct simple sentences.

    line 100

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Write relevant one-to-one email with one value and one easy next reply. Do not promise response rates.

Scope

Use for prospecting, partnerships, colleague requests, client updates, and follow-ups. Use no-ai-slop for AI-pattern detection or voice-preserving polish when ask and facts are already set. Use newsletter-growth for recurring broadcasts. Skip support, transactional, legal, and long-form announcement email.

Inputs

  • Recipient, role, company, and relationship.
  • One desired outcome.
  • One recipient benefit.
  • Verified hook and proof.
  • Smallest useful ask.
  • Sender voice and required formality.

User owns relationship, claims, proof, and recipient facts. Use placeholders when missing. Never invent familiarity, research, praise, urgency, shared connection, or results.

Drafting Defaults

Starting constraints, not performance rules:

  • Body under 100 words; aim 75-90 when complete.
  • Subject 3-6 words and under 50 characters.
  • Three short blocks: context, value, ask.
  • One benefit and one call to action.
  • Common words, short sentences, visible white space.
  • Grade 3-5 readability when topic permits. Keep required technical terms.

Break default when trust, compliance, risk, or technical clarity requires more. State reason.

Workflow

Step 1: Pin Goal

Reduce goal to one observable reply or action. Split unrelated requests.

  • Prospect: lead with relevant problem and credible benefit.
  • Colleague: lead with shared context and concrete request.
  • Client: lead with current state, impact, and next step.

Step 2: Verify Hook

Use one supplied or verified detail: recent event, shared connection, prior exchange, project, or public work. Opening line becomes preview text. Put recipient relevance before sender biography.

Step 3: Draft Subjects

Write three options. Keep conversational and specific. Lowercase only when voice fits; preserve proper nouns. Avoid fake reply markers, clickbait, vague checking in, or misleading urgency.

Useful patterns:

  • quick question about [company]
  • idea for [name]
  • [project] review
  • next step on [topic]

Step 4: Write Three Blocks

  1. Context: why recipient, why now, sender identity only when needed.
  2. Value: one tailored benefit plus one proof point when available.
  3. Ask: low-friction question answerable quickly.

Request meeting only when meeting is smallest useful step. Otherwise ask permission to send example, confirm interest, choose option, or review artifact.

Step 5: Tighten

Delete background, repeated value, stacked questions, filler, and oversized signature. Move ask to final line. Check subject length and body word count. Do not hit target by deleting material facts.

Step 6: Build Follow-Ups When Requested

Default 4-6 total touches over several weeks only when relationship, policy, and applicable rules permit. Each touch adds new example, result, resource, observation, clarification, alternative ask, or close-the-loop note.

Stop after decline, opt-out, wrong-recipient signal, or relationship-specific limit. Never send repeated just following up messages.

Fallbacks

  • No verified hook: use honest context; do not fake personalization.
  • No proof: offer concrete example or remove unsupported claim.
  • Sensitive update: exceed word target to preserve material facts.
  • Unknown outreach rules: draft only; flag compliance review before send.

Verify

  • Personalization true and relevant.
  • Value appears early.
  • One benefit and one ask.
  • Reply is easy.
  • Tone fits relationship.
  • Mobile scan works.
  • No unsupported claims or invented detail.
  • Follow-ups add value and include stop condition.

Writing

Use direct simple sentences. Skip rhetorical flourishes. Avoid X-not-Y contrasts, self-answering rhetorical questions, em dashes, alliterative three-part phrases, vague inspirational pivots, unsourced claims, and unverified quotes.

Output

For one email: three subjects, body, word count, placeholders. For sequence: timing, thread instruction, new value, and body per touch. State assumptions.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.