outreach-email
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Draft, shorten, personalize, or sequence concise one-to-one outreach emails for prospects, colleagues, and clients. Use when user says "write a cold email", "draft an outreach email", "make this email shorter", "write a follow-up sequence", "book a meeting by email", or asks for a short email that earns a reply, requests review, shares an update, or opens a sales conversation.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- bydeng01/phd-application-skilltheir own version, first seen Jun 17, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- bydeng01/phd-application-skill★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- clear-explanationSkill
- creative-writingSkill
- dataset-triageSkill
- excalidraw-system-sketchSkill
- figma-to-uiSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- mermaid-architecture-mapSkill
- newsletter-growthSkill
- no-ai-slopSkill
- presentation-builderSkill
- resume-helperSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- stanford-researchSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- verification-loopSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 7
Write relevant one-to-one email with one value and one easy next reply.
- Very specific: line 11
Use for prospecting, partnerships, colleague requests, client updates, and follow-ups.
- Distinctive: line 49
Use one supplied or verified detail: recent event, shared connection, prior exchange, project, or public work.
- Very specific: line 53
Write three options. Keep conversational and specific.
- Distinctive: line 66
Ask: low-friction question answerable quickly.
- Distinctive: line 72
Delete background, repeated value, stacked questions, filler, and oversized signature.
- Distinctive: line 76
Default 4-6 total touches over several weeks only when relationship, policy, and applicable rules permit.
- Very specific: line 78
Stop after decline, opt-out, wrong-recipient signal, or relationship-specific limit.
- Distinctive: line 82
No verified hook: use honest context.
- Distinctive: line 83
No proof: offer concrete example or remove unsupported claim.
- Distinctive: line 95
No unsupported claims or invented detail.
- Distinctive: line 96
Follow-ups add value and include stop condition.
- Distinctive: line 100
Use direct simple sentences.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Write relevant one-to-one email with one value and one easy next reply. Do not promise response rates.
Scope
Use for prospecting, partnerships, colleague requests, client updates, and follow-ups. Use no-ai-slop for AI-pattern detection or voice-preserving polish when ask and facts are already set. Use newsletter-growth for recurring broadcasts. Skip support, transactional, legal, and long-form announcement email.
Inputs
- Recipient, role, company, and relationship.
- One desired outcome.
- One recipient benefit.
- Verified hook and proof.
- Smallest useful ask.
- Sender voice and required formality.
User owns relationship, claims, proof, and recipient facts. Use placeholders when missing. Never invent familiarity, research, praise, urgency, shared connection, or results.
Drafting Defaults
Starting constraints, not performance rules:
- Body under 100 words; aim 75-90 when complete.
- Subject 3-6 words and under 50 characters.
- Three short blocks: context, value, ask.
- One benefit and one call to action.
- Common words, short sentences, visible white space.
- Grade 3-5 readability when topic permits. Keep required technical terms.
Break default when trust, compliance, risk, or technical clarity requires more. State reason.
Workflow
Step 1: Pin Goal
Reduce goal to one observable reply or action. Split unrelated requests.
- Prospect: lead with relevant problem and credible benefit.
- Colleague: lead with shared context and concrete request.
- Client: lead with current state, impact, and next step.
Step 2: Verify Hook
Use one supplied or verified detail: recent event, shared connection, prior exchange, project, or public work. Opening line becomes preview text. Put recipient relevance before sender biography.
Step 3: Draft Subjects
Write three options. Keep conversational and specific. Lowercase only when voice fits; preserve proper nouns. Avoid fake reply markers, clickbait, vague checking in, or misleading urgency.
Useful patterns:
quick question about [company]idea for [name][project] reviewnext step on [topic]
Step 4: Write Three Blocks
- Context: why recipient, why now, sender identity only when needed.
- Value: one tailored benefit plus one proof point when available.
- Ask: low-friction question answerable quickly.
Request meeting only when meeting is smallest useful step. Otherwise ask permission to send example, confirm interest, choose option, or review artifact.
Step 5: Tighten
Delete background, repeated value, stacked questions, filler, and oversized signature. Move ask to final line. Check subject length and body word count. Do not hit target by deleting material facts.
Step 6: Build Follow-Ups When Requested
Default 4-6 total touches over several weeks only when relationship, policy, and applicable rules permit. Each touch adds new example, result, resource, observation, clarification, alternative ask, or close-the-loop note.
Stop after decline, opt-out, wrong-recipient signal, or relationship-specific limit. Never send repeated just following up messages.
Fallbacks
- No verified hook: use honest context; do not fake personalization.
- No proof: offer concrete example or remove unsupported claim.
- Sensitive update: exceed word target to preserve material facts.
- Unknown outreach rules: draft only; flag compliance review before send.
Verify
- Personalization true and relevant.
- Value appears early.
- One benefit and one ask.
- Reply is easy.
- Tone fits relationship.
- Mobile scan works.
- No unsupported claims or invented detail.
- Follow-ups add value and include stop condition.
Writing
Use direct simple sentences. Skip rhetorical flourishes. Avoid X-not-Y contrasts, self-answering rhetorical questions, em dashes, alliterative three-part phrases, vague inspirational pivots, unsourced claims, and unverified quotes.
Output
For one email: three subjects, body, word count, placeholders. For sequence: timing, thread instruction, new value, and body per touch. State assumptions.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

