agentleFS
egregore-labsegregore-labs/egregore/.claude/skills/tutorial/SKILL.md

tutorial

Skill293 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub

Interactive walkthrough of Egregore's Local core loop — activity, reflection, and a quest — using adaptive questions and real Runtime-backed artifacts. Use for 'tutorial', 'walk me through Egregore', or 'show me how this works'; use onboarding for first-time identity or org setup.

10 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Keep the experience conversational.

    line 9
  2. Very specific:

    Read only tutorial and onboarding hints from .egregore-state.json.

    line 17
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask only missing tailoring questions: work domain, then one domain-specific stage question.

    line 29
  4. Distinctive:

    Use the activity snapshot and onboarding focus to ask two adaptive questions:

    line 43
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep the receipt's stable artifact id and canonical path for the next step.

    line 62
  6. Distinctive:

    Ask for the bigger open question behind the captured insight, what would make it feel answered, and up to three initial threads.

    line 66
  7. Distinctive:

    If they decline, explain that the reflection remains useful on its own.

    line 77
  8. Very specific:

    Add tutorial-generated to every tutorial knowledge artifact.

    line 97
  9. Distinctive:

    No implicit publication, external sharing, notification, or feedback upload.

    line 101

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Tutorial

Guide the user through one real Local loop: orient → capture → connect → close. Keep the experience conversational; never lecture or expose raw command output.

When to invoke

Interactive walkthrough of Egregore's Local core loop — activity, reflection, and a quest — using adaptive questions and real Runtime-backed artifacts. Use for 'tutorial', 'walk me through Egregore', or 'show me how this works'; use onboarding for first-time identity or org setup.

Resume state

Read only tutorial and onboarding hints from .egregore-state.json. Reuse onboarding.harvest_rounds to avoid repeated role/focus questions. reset clears tutorial-only keys. Resume from the stored checkpoint; if already complete, offer reset or normal work. Tutorial state is local product state, not organizational memory or telemetry.

Reuse attached EGREGORE_ORG_CONTEXT_V1; do not repeat its retrieval or source opens. The tutorial never calls QMD, graph, Git, control-plane storage, publishing, sharing, notifications, or telemetry directly.

1. Orient

Ask only missing tailoring questions: work domain, then one domain-specific stage question. Fetch exactly one authorized activity snapshot and render it using the real activity surface:

bash bin/activity-data.sh 2>/dev/null \
  | bash bin/node-run.sh bin/codex-skill-render.mjs activity-card -

Explain briefly that activity is the starting point for sessions, obligations, questions, and quests. Use “organizational memory,” never graph language.

2. Capture

Use the activity snapshot and onboarding focus to ask two adaptive questions:

  1. What throughline or hard problem matters now?
  2. What changed, remains blocked, or became clear?

The answer must concern the user's real work, not Egregore. Infer decision, finding, or pattern (default finding), preview it, and explicitly confirm the practice write. Render one complete body to a temporary file under tmp/, then call exactly once; {artifact-file} is that file, and {artifact-type}, {title}, and {topic} come from the confirmed insight:

bash bin/knowledge.sh create \
  --type '{artifact-type}' --title '{title}' \
  --input '{artifact-file}' \
  --topic tutorial-generated --topic '{topic}' \
  --workstream "tutorial"

Keep the receipt's stable artifact id and canonical path for the next step.

3. Connect

Ask for the bigger open question behind the captured insight, what would make it feel answered, and up to three initial threads. If the user wants a real quest, make one domain call:

bash bin/quest.sh new \
  --title "{title}" --question "{open question}" \
  --project tutorial-generated \
  --thread "{thread}" [--thread "{thread}"]...

If they decline, explain that the reflection remains useful on its own. Do not infer participants or send notifications. Adding people or notifying them is a later action requiring separate permission and explicit consent.

4. Close

Show what the Runtime accepted: the activity snapshot, canonical insight, and optional quest. Ask one short feedback question. Keep feedback local in tutorial state unless the user separately asks to capture it as organizational knowledge. Mark the tutorial complete and give one tailored next move:

  • group founder: hand off after the next real session
  • group joiner: check activity after time away
  • personal: reflect whenever something clicks
  • agent-focused: add durable project context before delegating

End with exactly: What are you working on?

Invariants

  • Add tutorial-generated to every tutorial knowledge artifact; mark tutorial quests with the same project marker until quest topics are supported.
  • One Runtime command per accepted artifact or quest; never repeat save/index.
  • Canonical Markdown/Git wins over every derived projection.
  • No implicit publication, external sharing, notification, or feedback upload.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.