no-slop
Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write code comments, docs, PRs, and commit messages that sound like a sharp engineer, not an AI. Use whenever generating prose or comments.
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- aayushchugh/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- RealAlexandreAI/public-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
- iam25th1/no-sloptheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- razakiau/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- saschb2b/okf-bundlestheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- pragyesh85-SPT/The-heritage-of-fable5their own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- Tariux/AI-Skills-Not-Awesome★ 49same name
- saschb2b/skills★ 22same name
- Eid0lon/zero-slop★ 13same name
- lcsxu/zero-slop★ 13same name
- Byk3y/no-slop★ 10same name
- aayushchugh/skills★ 4same name
- razakiau/skills★ 3same name
- saschb2b/okf-bundles★ 2same name
- pragyesh85-SPT/The-heritage-of-fable5★ 1same name
- Quad4-Software/skills★ 1same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- commit-surgeonSkill
- debug-scientificallySkill
- pr-describerSkill
- security-sweepSkill
- test-firstSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
No filler openers: Delete "In today's fast-paced world", "It is important to note that", "Let's dive in", "At the end of the day".
- Distinctive: line 20
No summary that repeats the body: If the conclusion adds nothing, delete it.
- Distinctive: line 22
No em dashes as a crutch: Use a comma, a colon, or two sentences.
- Distinctive: line 31
Cut every word that can go: Read the draft once and delete a third of it.
- Distinctive: line 37
Read it aloud. If it sounds like a press release or a textbook intro, rewrite it.
- Distinctive: line 38
If a busy reviewer would skim past it, it is not earning its place.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
No Slop
AI writing has tells. They make output feel generic, padded, and untrustworthy. Strip them. Write the way a senior engineer writes when they respect the reader's time.
Banned patterns
- No filler openers. Delete "In today's fast-paced world", "It is important to note that", "Let's dive in", "At the end of the day".
- No hype adjectives. Cut "powerful", "seamless", "robust", "cutting-edge", "game-changing", "elegant" unless you can prove it in the next clause.
- No throat-clearing. Say the thing. "This function retries failed uploads" beats "This function is designed to handle the retrying of uploads that fail".
- No summary that repeats the body. If the conclusion adds nothing, delete it.
- No emoji-bulleted marketing in code comments or technical docs.
- No em dashes as a crutch. Use a comma, a colon, or two sentences.
Do instead
- Lead with the point. First sentence carries the main idea.
- Prefer concrete over abstract. Name the actual file, value, or failure mode instead of gesturing at "various scenarios".
- Comment the why, not the what. Good: "Retry twice because the S3 client throws on cold connections." Bad: "This retries the request."
- Cut every word that can go. Read the draft once and delete a third of it.
- Match the surrounding voice. New comments should read like the file's existing comments, not like a blog post dropped into source.
Test before shipping prose
Read it aloud. If it sounds like a press release or a textbook intro, rewrite it. If a busy reviewer would skim past it, it is not earning its place.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

