refinement
Skill8 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub
Prepare technical analysis for backlog refinement meetings.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- HsuanYuLee/polaristheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- MaximilianMayr94/skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 25, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- HsuanYuLee/polaris★ 5same name
- MaximilianMayr94/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- home/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- run-claude-code-configSkill
- adrSkill
- api-designSkill
- commitSkill
- django-patternsSkill
- docker-patternsSkill
- eow-reviewSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- hotfixSkill
- infrastructureSkill
- laterSkill
- mkdocs-styleSkill
- project-setupSkill
- prSkill
- security-patternsSkill
- standupSkill
- statusSkill
- testing-patternsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Ask the user to supply the ticket details:
- Distinctive: line 52
Run up to 3 Explore agents in parallel for efficiency.
- Distinctive: line 77
Create output directory structure:
- Distinctive: line 158
After generating files, present:
- Very specific: line 182
Default output directory: ./refinement/ in project root
- Distinctive: line 183
Use architecture patterns from CLAUDE.md when exploring (if available)
- Distinctive: line 184
Keep estimates conservative - round up when uncertain
- Distinctive: line 186
If ticket description is vague, generate more clarifying questions
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Prepare technical analysis for backlog refinement meetings.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS
- List of Jira ticket IDs:
/refinement BIL-3606 BIL-3580 BIL-3252 - Output directory:
/refinement BIL-3606 --output ./refinement-2026-01-17/ - Exploration depth:
/refinement BIL-3606 --explore thorough(quick|medium|thorough)
Step 1: Fetch Tickets
Ask the user to supply the ticket details:
"I don't have direct Jira access. Please provide ticket details in one of these formats:
- Jira REST API JSON (paste from
<your-jira-base>/rest/api/2/issue/TICKET-ID)- Copy/paste the ticket description from Jira
- Tell me the ticket IDs and I'll ask for details on each"
Step 2: Explore Codebase
For each ticket, launch an Explore agent to find relevant code:
Task(subagent_type="Explore", prompt="""
Find code related to: {ticket.summary}
Context from ticket:
{ticket.description}
Search for:
1. Related components, models, APIs
2. Similar existing implementations
3. Test files
4. Migration patterns (if data changes needed)
Return:
- Key files with line numbers
- Existing patterns to follow
- Potential complexity factors
""")Run up to 3 Explore agents in parallel for efficiency.
Step 3: Analyze & Estimate
For each ticket, determine:
Story Points (Fibonacci: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13):
| Factor | 1-2 pts | 3-5 pts | 8-13 pts |
| Files touched | 1-2 | 3-5 | 6+ |
| Backend changes | None | Model or API | Model + API + Migration |
| Frontend changes | None | Single component | Multiple components |
| New patterns | Following existing | Minor adaptation | New architecture |
| Dependencies | None | 1-2 tickets | Blocked or complex chain |
Generate for each ticket:
- Implementation steps (bullet points)
- Key files to modify
- Clarifying questions
- Risk assessment
Step 4: Generate Output
Create output directory structure:
{output_dir}/
├── README.md # Index with summary table
├── BIL-XXXX_{title_snake_case}.md # Individual ticket files
└── ...Individual Ticket File Template:
# {ticket.key}: {ticket.summary}
**Story Points:** {estimated_points}
**Priority:** {ticket.priority}
**Status:** {ticket.status}
**Description:** {ticket.description | summarized}
---
## Key Files
| File | Purpose | Lines |
| ----------------- | ------------- | ----- |
| `path/to/file.py` | Model changes | 50-75 |
| ... | ... | ... |
---
## Implementation Steps
1. Step one
2. Step two
3. ...
---
## Clarifying Questions
- Question 1?
- Question 2?
---
## Risk Assessment
**Risk Level:** Low | Medium | High
**Primary Risk:** Description
**Mitigation:** How to addressIndex File (README.md) Template:
# Backlog Refinement - {date}
## Summary Table
| Ticket | Title | Points | Complexity | Risk | Details |
| -------- | ----- | ------ | ------------ | ------------ | --------------------------- |
| BIL-XXXX | Title | **N** | Low/Med/High | Low/Med/High | [View](./BIL-XXXX_title.md) |
---
## Dependencies
{dependency_diagram}
---
## Action Items
- [ ] Action item from refinementStep 5: Present Summary
After generating files, present:
- Summary table of all tickets with estimates
- Key risks across all tickets
- Dependencies between tickets
- Recommended discussion order for refinement meeting
Ask:
"I've created refinement documents in
{output_dir}/. Would you like me to:
- Add meeting notes after your refinement session?
- Create any additional analysis?"
Final output:
"Refinement analysis complete:
- Local files:
{output_dir}/Total: {n} tickets, {total_points} story points estimated"
Guidelines
- Default output directory:
./refinement/in project root - Use architecture patterns from CLAUDE.md when exploring (if available)
- Keep estimates conservative - round up when uncertain
- Flag blockers and dependencies prominently
- If ticket description is vague, generate more clarifying questions
- Cross-reference related tickets if they appear in the batch
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

