opus-prompting
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Apply Claude Opus 5 agentic prompting patterns: narration diet, scope control, subagent caps, and thinking-disabled mitigations.
In this repository138 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/context-budget.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/delegation-law.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/harness-doctrine.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/verification-law.mdcCursor rule
- agent-interface-designSkill
- agentloop-coreSkill
- agent-loopSkill
- blindspot-passSkill
- brainstorm-prototypesSkill
- change-quizSkill
- conductor-planSkill
- context-auditSkill
- context-compactSkill
- context-surgeonSkill
- contrastingSkill
- deployment-auditSkill
- doctorSkill
- harness-designSkill
- humaniseSkill
- implementation-notesSkill
- implementation-planSkill
- interview-meSkill
- no-ai-slopSkill
- optional-ponytailSkill
- persistent-memorySkill
- pev-cycleSkill
- pitch-packagerSkill
- progressive-disclosureSkill
- quality-composeSkill
- reference-huntSkill
- seo-copywritingSkill
- ship-gateSkill
- subagent-swarmSkill
- ui-ux-auditSkill
- warroom-councilSkill
- writer-verifierSkill
- agent-interface-designSkill
- agentloop-coreSkill
- agent-loopSkill
- blindspot-passSkill
- brainstorm-prototypesSkill
- change-quizSkill
- conductor-planSkill
- context-auditSkill
- context-compactSkill
- context-surgeonSkill
- contrastingSkill
- deployment-auditSkill
- doctorSkill
- harness-designSkill
- humaniseSkill
- implementation-notesSkill
- implementation-planSkill
- interview-meSkill
- no-ai-slopSkill
- optional-ponytailSkill
- opus-promptingSkill
- persistent-memorySkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Opus Prompting
From Anthropic's Opus 5 prompting guide:
- Conciseness: ask for brief focused responses explicitly; effort ≠ verbosity.
- Narration: one sentence before first tools; updates on important turns; outcome-first finish.
- Scope: deliver asked scope; one-sentence challenge then continue; finish whole task.
- Subagents: only large independent parallel work; no self-verify spawns; keep counts low.
- Self-correction: do not add double-check theater; narrate corrections only when user-impacting.
- Thinking disabled: prefer thinking on + lower effort; if disabled, allow a brief sentence before tools, refuse fake tool text, ban internal XML tags in user output.
- Reviews: ask to report all real issues, then filter — do not pre-emptively say "only high severity" if you want recall.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.