issues
Skill3 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Query issues.ecosyste.ms for issue and pull request metadata and statistics across GitHub, GitLab and other forges. Use when checking how responsive a project is, average time to close, PR merge rate, contributor counts, or listing open issues without hitting the forge API directly.
- Sends data out
21 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- halilural/imprimaturtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- davidvornholt/mail-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- davidvornholt/mailboxtheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- dotBunny/Claudettetheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- fslzrr/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use prd, architecture and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GitHubSkillprd
Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.
Also in 6 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillarchitecture
Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 6 projects that use this
SentrySkillcommit
Create commit messages following Sentry conventions. Use when committing code changes, writing commit messages, or formatting git history. Follows conventional commits with Sentry-specific issue references.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- ecosyste-ms/skills★ 3100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 20
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow★ 1.7ksame name
- martinus/unordered_dense★ 1.5ksame name
- bjcoombs/ai-native-toolkit★ 32same name
- 0xrafasec/ai-workflow★ 9same name
- rafagomes/ai-workflow★ 9same name
- dotBunny/Claudette★ 7same name
- Magnus-Gille/claude-skills★ 5same name
- davidvornholt/mail-mcp★ 2same name
- davidvornholt/mailbox★ 2same name
- devskale/skale-skills★ 2same name
10 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- advisoriesSkill
- commitsSkill
- dockerSkill
- packagesSkill
- reposSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
All responses are JSON. No auth required.
- Distinctive: line 59
If a repo isn't indexed yet, POST a job and poll it:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ecosyste.ms Issues API
Base URL: https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1
All responses are JSON. No auth required. Set a User-Agent header. Lookup endpoints return a 302 redirect, so use curl -L.
Full OpenAPI spec: https://issues.ecosyste.ms/docs/api/v1/openapi.yaml
Repository issue stats
curl -sL 'https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/repositories/lookup?url=https://github.com/rails/rails'Or directly by host (repo names containing / must be URL-encoded as %2F):
curl -s 'https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/rails%2Frails'Returns aggregate stats for all time and the past year: issues_count, pull_requests_count, issues_closed_count, merged_pull_requests_count, avg_time_to_close_issue (seconds), avg_time_to_close_pull_request, issue_authors_count, pull_request_authors_count, avg_comments_per_issue, bot_issues_count, bot_pull_requests_count, plus past_year_* variants of each.
List issues and PRs
# open issues (not PRs)
curl -s 'https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/rails%2Frails/issues?state=open&pull_request=false'
# PRs with a given label
curl -s 'https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/rails%2Frails/issues?pull_request=true&label=activerecord'
# a single issue
curl -s 'https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/rails%2Frails/issues/50000'
# label counts
curl -s 'https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/rails%2Frails/labels'Filters: state (open/closed), pull_request (true/false), label, created_after, updated_after, sort, order, page, per_page.
Owners and authors
Aggregated issue stats across every repo owned by an org, and per-author activity:
curl -s 'https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/owners/rails'
curl -s 'https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/owners/rails/maintainers'
curl -s 'https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/authors/dhh'Trigger a sync
If a repo isn't indexed yet, POST a job and poll it:
curl -s -X POST 'https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/jobs?url=https://github.com/owner/repo'
curl -s 'https://issues.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/jobs/<job-id>'When to use
- Assessing project health: are issues being closed, are PRs being merged
- Comparing maintainer responsiveness between projects
- Counting external vs bot contributions
- Listing issues/PRs without GitHub API rate limits
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

