agentleFS
echoleesongecholeesong/claude-skills-plugin/skills/n8n-validation-expert/SKILL.md

n8n-validation-expert

Skill4 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Interpret validation errors and guide fixing them. Use when encountering validation errors, validation warnings, false positives, operator structure issues, or need help understanding validation results. Also use when asking about validation profiles, error types, or the validation loop process.

22 other projects use a version of this, 16 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use n8n-code-tool, n8n-multi-instance and 8 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • czlonkowskiSkill

    n8n-code-tool

    Write JavaScript or Python for the n8n Custom Code Tool (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode) — the AI-agent-callable tool, NOT the workflow Code node. Use when building a Code Tool attached to an AI Agent, writing code that an LLM will invoke, parsing the `query` input, returning a string result, defining an input schema for structured arguments (specifyInputSchema, jsonSchemaExample, DynamicStructuredTool), or troubleshooting errors like \"Wrong output type returned\", \"No execution data available\", \"The response property should be a string, but it is an object\", \"Cannot assign to read only property 'name'\", or an AI agent that refuses to call the tool. Covers the critical differences between Code node and Code Tool: return format (string vs `[{json:{...}}]`), unavailability of `$fromAI`/`$input`/`$helpers` in the Code Tool sandbox, naming rules for AI invocation, and when to use `toolWorkflow`/HTTP Request Tool instead.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • czlonkowskiSkill

    n8n-multi-instance

    Use when an n8n-mcp account targets more than one n8n instance — i.e. the `n8n_instances` tool is available, the user mentions multiple n8n instances or environments (prod vs staging, several teams or clients), several agents or chats work on one account in parallel, a workflow / datatable / credential / execution call returns an unexpected NOT_FOUND or reads data you don't recognize, or a call is refused with `INSTANCE_AMBIGUOUS` or `INSTANCE_NOT_FOUND`. Covers naming the target instance on each call with the `instance` argument, setting the default with `switch`, verifying the target before high-stakes work — credential writes above all — and recovering from misroutes and fail-closes. Always consult this skill before operating on a specific instance, before any credential create/update/delete on a multi-instance account, or when a call hits the wrong/empty data or an instance error.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • tmolaviSkill

    n8n-agents

    Use when building n8n AI Agent / LangChain clusters — tools, memory, RAG, structured output, system prompts, sub-workflow-as-tool, or fixing agent connection topology (ai_languageModel, ai_tool, ai_memory).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • tmolaviSkill

    n8n-error-handling

    Use for production n8n workflows, webhook APIs, retries, error outputs, error workflows, dead-letter patterns, and correct HTTP response status shapes for callers.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • silvainfmSkill

    marketing-ideas

    When the user needs marketing ideas, inspiration, or strategies for their SaaS or software product. Also use when the user asks for 'marketing ideas,' 'growth ideas,' 'how to market,' 'marketing strategies,' 'marketing tactics,' 'ways to promote,' or 'ideas to grow.' This skill provides 140 proven marketing approaches organized by category.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • silvainfmSkill

    pricing-strategy

    When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' or 'monetization.' This skill covers pricing research, tier structure, and packaging strategy.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +3 more from czlonkowski
  • +1 more from tmolavi

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

32 rules. 23 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.

  • 23

    Common

    Most of the 18 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 9

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Blocks workflow execution: - Must be resolved before activation

    line 28
  2. Common:

    This is normal!: Don't be discouraged by multiple iterations.

    line 133
  3. Very specific:

    Use get_node_essentials to see required fields

    line 196
  4. Common:

    Add the missing field to your configuration

    line 197
  5. Common:

    Check error message for allowed values

    line 217
  6. Very specific:

    Use get_node_essentials to see options

    line 218
  7. Common:

    Update to a valid value

    line 219
  8. Common:

    Check expected type in error message

    line 239
  9. Common:

    Use n8n Expression Syntax skill

    line 260
  10. Very specific:

    Check for missing {{}} or typos

    line 261
  11. Common:

    Verify node/field references

    line 262
  12. Common:

    Check node name spelling

    line 282
  13. Common:

    Verify node exists in workflow

    line 283
  14. Common:

    Update reference to correct name

    line 284
  15. Very specific:

    Solution: Use cleanStaleConnections operation in n8n_update_partial_workflow

    line 368
  16. Common:

    Solution: Add missing connections or remove extra rules

    line 373
  17. Common:

    Warning: No error handling configured

    line 390
  18. Common:

    Warning: No rate limiting for API calls

    line 410
  19. Common:

    Connections: - No broken references

    line 522
  20. Common:

    Fix: Remove stale connection or create missing node

    line 551
  21. Common:

    Fix: Remove extra triggers or split into separate workflows

    line 569
  22. Common:

    Create minimal valid configuration

    line 589
  23. Common:

    Remove half the nodes

    line 597
  24. Common:

    If works: problem is in removed nodes

    line 599
  25. Common:

    If fails: problem is in remaining nodes

    line 600
  26. Common:

    Read error messages completely

    line 640
  27. Very specific:

    Use runtime profile for pre-deployment

    line 642
  28. Very specific:

    Check valid field before assuming success

    line 643
  29. Very specific:

    Use get_node_essentials when unclear about requirements

    line 645
  30. Common:

    Document false positives you accept

    line 646
  31. Very specific:

    Use strict profile during development (too noisy)

    line 653
  32. Very specific:

    [FALSE_POSITIVES.md](FALSE_POSITIVES.md): - When warnings are acceptable

    line 666

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 18 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

n8n Validation Expert

Expert guide for interpreting and fixing n8n validation errors.


Validation Philosophy

Validate early, validate often

Validation is typically iterative:

  • Expect validation feedback loops
  • Usually 2-3 validate → fix cycles
  • Average: 23s thinking about errors, 58s fixing them

Key insight: Validation is an iterative process, not one-shot!


Error Severity Levels

1. Errors (Must Fix)

Blocks workflow execution - Must be resolved before activation

Types:

  • missing_required - Required field not provided
  • invalid_value - Value doesn't match allowed options
  • type_mismatch - Wrong data type (string instead of number)
  • invalid_reference - Referenced node doesn't exist
  • invalid_expression - Expression syntax error

Example:

{
  "type": "missing_required",
  "property": "channel",
  "message": "Channel name is required",
  "fix": "Provide a channel name (lowercase, no spaces, 1-80 characters)"
}

2. Warnings (Should Fix)

Doesn't block execution - Workflow can be activated but may have issues

Types:

  • best_practice - Recommended but not required
  • deprecated - Using old API/feature
  • performance - Potential performance issue

Example:

{
  "type": "best_practice",
  "property": "errorHandling",
  "message": "Slack API can have rate limits",
  "suggestion": "Add onError: 'continueRegularOutput' with retryOnFail"
}

3. Suggestions (Optional)

Nice to have - Improvements that could enhance workflow

Types:

  • optimization - Could be more efficient
  • alternative - Better way to achieve same result

The Validation Loop

Pattern from Telemetry

7,841 occurrences of this pattern:

1. Configure node
   ↓
2. validate_node_operation (23 seconds thinking about errors)
   ↓
3. Read error messages carefully
   ↓
4. Fix errors
   ↓
5. validate_node_operation again (58 seconds fixing)
   ↓
6. Repeat until valid (usually 2-3 iterations)

Example

// Iteration 1
let config = {
  resource: "channel",
  operation: "create"
};

const result1 = validate_node_operation({
  nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
  config,
  profile: "runtime"
});
// → Error: Missing "name"

// ⏱️  23 seconds thinking...

// Iteration 2
config.name = "general";

const result2 = validate_node_operation({
  nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
  config,
  profile: "runtime"
});
// → Error: Missing "text"

// ⏱️  58 seconds fixing...

// Iteration 3
config.text = "Hello!";

const result3 = validate_node_operation({
  nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
  config,
  profile: "runtime"
});
// → Valid! ✅

This is normal! Don't be discouraged by multiple iterations.


Validation Profiles

Choose the right profile for your stage:

minimal

Use when: Quick checks during editing

Validates:

  • Only required fields
  • Basic structure

Pros: Fastest, most permissive Cons: May miss issues

runtime (RECOMMENDED)

Use when: Pre-deployment validation

Validates:

  • Required fields
  • Value types
  • Allowed values
  • Basic dependencies

Pros: Balanced, catches real errors Cons: Some edge cases missed

This is the recommended profile for most use cases

ai-friendly

Use when: AI-generated configurations

Validates:

  • Same as runtime
  • Reduces false positives
  • More tolerant of minor issues

Pros: Less noisy for AI workflows Cons: May allow some questionable configs

strict

Use when: Production deployment, critical workflows

Validates:

  • Everything
  • Best practices
  • Performance concerns
  • Security issues

Pros: Maximum safety Cons: Many warnings, some false positives


Common Error Types

1. missing_required

What it means: A required field is not provided

How to fix:

  1. Use get_node_essentials to see required fields
  2. Add the missing field to your configuration
  3. Provide an appropriate value

Example:

// Error
{
  "type": "missing_required",
  "property": "channel",
  "message": "Channel name is required"
}

// Fix
config.channel = "#general";

2. invalid_value

What it means: Value doesn't match allowed options

How to fix:

  1. Check error message for allowed values
  2. Use get_node_essentials to see options
  3. Update to a valid value

Example:

// Error
{
  "type": "invalid_value",
  "property": "operation",
  "message": "Operation must be one of: post, update, delete",
  "current": "send"
}

// Fix
config.operation = "post";  // Use valid operation

3. type_mismatch

What it means: Wrong data type for field

How to fix:

  1. Check expected type in error message
  2. Convert value to correct type

Example:

// Error
{
  "type": "type_mismatch",
  "property": "limit",
  "message": "Expected number, got string",
  "current": "100"
}

// Fix
config.limit = 100;  // Number, not string

4. invalid_expression

What it means: Expression syntax error

How to fix:

  1. Use n8n Expression Syntax skill
  2. Check for missing {{}} or typos
  3. Verify node/field references

Example:

// Error
{
  "type": "invalid_expression",
  "property": "text",
  "message": "Invalid expression: $json.name",
  "current": "$json.name"
}

// Fix
config.text = "={{$json.name}}";  // Add {{}}

5. invalid_reference

What it means: Referenced node doesn't exist

How to fix:

  1. Check node name spelling
  2. Verify node exists in workflow
  3. Update reference to correct name

Example:

// Error
{
  "type": "invalid_reference",
  "property": "expression",
  "message": "Node 'HTTP Requets' does not exist",
  "current": "={{$node['HTTP Requets'].json.data}}"
}

// Fix - correct typo
config.expression = "={{$node['HTTP Request'].json.data}}";

Auto-Sanitization System

What It Does

Automatically fixes common operator structure issues on ANY workflow update

Runs when:

  • n8n_create_workflow
  • n8n_update_partial_workflow
  • Any workflow save operation

What It Fixes

1. Binary Operators (Two Values)

Operators: equals, notEquals, contains, notContains, greaterThan, lessThan, startsWith, endsWith

Fix: Removes singleValue property (binary operators compare two values)

Before:

{
  "type": "boolean",
  "operation": "equals",
  "singleValue": true  // ❌ Wrong!
}

After (automatic):

{
  "type": "boolean",
  "operation": "equals"
  // singleValue removed ✅
}

2. Unary Operators (One Value)

Operators: isEmpty, isNotEmpty, true, false

Fix: Adds singleValue: true (unary operators check single value)

Before:

{
  "type": "boolean",
  "operation": "isEmpty"
  // Missing singleValue ❌
}

After (automatic):

{
  "type": "boolean",
  "operation": "isEmpty",
  "singleValue": true  // ✅ Added
}

3. IF/Switch Metadata

Fix: Adds complete conditions.options metadata for IF v2.2+ and Switch v3.2+

What It CANNOT Fix

1. Broken Connections

References to non-existent nodes

Solution: Use cleanStaleConnections operation in n8n_update_partial_workflow

2. Branch Count Mismatches

3 Switch rules but only 2 output connections

Solution: Add missing connections or remove extra rules

3. Paradoxical Corrupt States

API returns corrupt data but rejects updates

Solution: May require manual database intervention


False Positives

What Are They?

Validation warnings that are technically "wrong" but acceptable in your use case

Common False Positives

1. "Missing error handling"

Warning: No error handling configured

When acceptable:

  • Simple workflows where failures are obvious
  • Testing/development workflows
  • Non-critical notifications

When to fix: Production workflows handling important data

2. "No retry logic"

Warning: Node doesn't retry on failure

When acceptable:

  • APIs with their own retry logic
  • Idempotent operations
  • Manual trigger workflows

When to fix: Flaky external services, production automation

3. "Missing rate limiting"

Warning: No rate limiting for API calls

When acceptable:

  • Internal APIs with no limits
  • Low-volume workflows
  • APIs with server-side rate limiting

When to fix: Public APIs, high-volume workflows

4. "Unbounded query"

Warning: SELECT without LIMIT

When acceptable:

  • Small known datasets
  • Aggregation queries
  • Development/testing

When to fix: Production queries on large tables

Reducing False Positives

Use ai-friendly profile:

validate_node_operation({
  nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
  config: {...},
  profile: "ai-friendly"  // Fewer false positives
})

Validation Result Structure

Complete Response

{
  "valid": false,
  "errors": [
    {
      "type": "missing_required",
      "property": "channel",
      "message": "Channel name is required",
      "fix": "Provide a channel name (lowercase, no spaces)"
    }
  ],
  "warnings": [
    {
      "type": "best_practice",
      "property": "errorHandling",
      "message": "Slack API can have rate limits",
      "suggestion": "Add onError: 'continueRegularOutput'"
    }
  ],
  "suggestions": [
    {
      "type": "optimization",
      "message": "Consider using batch operations for multiple messages"
    }
  ],
  "summary": {
    "hasErrors": true,
    "errorCount": 1,
    "warningCount": 1,
    "suggestionCount": 1
  }
}

How to Read It

1. Check valid field

if (result.valid) {
  // ✅ Configuration is valid
} else {
  // ❌ Has errors - must fix before deployment
}

2. Fix errors first

result.errors.forEach(error => {
  console.log(`Error in ${error.property}: ${error.message}`);
  console.log(`Fix: ${error.fix}`);
});

3. Review warnings

result.warnings.forEach(warning => {
  console.log(`Warning: ${warning.message}`);
  console.log(`Suggestion: ${warning.suggestion}`);
  // Decide if you need to address this
});

4. Consider suggestions

// Optional improvements
// Not required but may enhance workflow

Workflow Validation

validate_workflow (Structure)

Validates entire workflow, not just individual nodes

Checks:

  1. Node configurations - Each node valid
  2. Connections - No broken references
  3. Expressions - Syntax and references valid
  4. Flow - Logical workflow structure

Example:

validate_workflow({
  workflow: {
    nodes: [...],
    connections: {...}
  },
  options: {
    validateNodes: true,
    validateConnections: true,
    validateExpressions: true,
    profile: "runtime"
  }
})

Common Workflow Errors

1. Broken Connections

{
  "error": "Connection from 'Transform' to 'NonExistent' - target node not found"
}

Fix: Remove stale connection or create missing node

2. Circular Dependencies

{
  "error": "Circular dependency detected: Node A → Node B → Node A"
}

Fix: Restructure workflow to remove loop

3. Multiple Start Nodes

{
  "warning": "Multiple trigger nodes found - only one will execute"
}

Fix: Remove extra triggers or split into separate workflows

4. Disconnected Nodes

{
  "warning": "Node 'Transform' is not connected to workflow flow"
}

Fix: Connect node or remove if unused


Recovery Strategies

Strategy 1: Start Fresh

When: Configuration is severely broken

Steps:

  1. Note required fields from get_node_essentials
  2. Create minimal valid configuration
  3. Add features incrementally
  4. Validate after each addition

Strategy 2: Binary Search

When: Workflow validates but executes incorrectly

Steps:

  1. Remove half the nodes
  2. Validate and test
  3. If works: problem is in removed nodes
  4. If fails: problem is in remaining nodes
  5. Repeat until problem isolated

Strategy 3: Clean Stale Connections

When: "Node not found" errors

Steps:

n8n_update_partial_workflow({
  id: "workflow-id",
  operations: [{
    type: "cleanStaleConnections"
  }]
})

Strategy 4: Use Auto-fix

When: Operator structure errors

Steps:

n8n_autofix_workflow({
  id: "workflow-id",
  applyFixes: false  // Preview first
})

// Review fixes, then apply
n8n_autofix_workflow({
  id: "workflow-id",
  applyFixes: true
})

Best Practices

✅ Do

  • Validate after every significant change
  • Read error messages completely
  • Fix errors iteratively (one at a time)
  • Use runtime profile for pre-deployment
  • Check valid field before assuming success
  • Trust auto-sanitization for operator issues
  • Use get_node_essentials when unclear about requirements
  • Document false positives you accept

❌ Don't

  • Skip validation before activation
  • Try to fix all errors at once
  • Ignore error messages
  • Use strict profile during development (too noisy)
  • Assume validation passed (always check result)
  • Manually fix auto-sanitization issues
  • Deploy with unresolved errors
  • Ignore all warnings (some are important!)

Detailed Guides

For comprehensive error catalogs and false positive examples:

  • ERROR_CATALOG.md - Complete list of error types with examples
  • FALSE_POSITIVES.md - When warnings are acceptable

Summary

Key Points:

  1. Validation is iterative (avg 2-3 cycles, 23s + 58s)
  2. Errors must be fixed, warnings are optional
  3. Auto-sanitization fixes operator structures automatically
  4. Use runtime profile for balanced validation
  5. False positives exist - learn to recognize them
  6. Read error messages - they contain fix guidance

Validation Process:

  1. Validate → Read errors → Fix → Validate again
  2. Repeat until valid (usually 2-3 iterations)
  3. Review warnings and decide if acceptable
  4. Deploy with confidence

Related Skills:

  • n8n MCP Tools Expert - Use validation tools correctly
  • n8n Expression Syntax - Fix expression errors
  • n8n Node Configuration - Understand required fields

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.