fetch-ticket
Skill85 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub
Fetch one or more tickets/issues from their tracker (Azure DevOps, Jira, GitHub, …) and save each as a self-contained markdown ticket file. Fetch only — no analysis or planning.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agentify-projectSkill
- attach-to-ticketSkill
- check-ticket-implementationSkill
- compact-docs-writerSkill
- compact-skill-creatorSkill
- context-checkupSkill
- create-implementation-planSkill
- create-manual-test-instructionsSkill
- execute-plan-tasksSkill
- explain-in-simple-languageSkill
- extract-pr-review-rulesSkill
- fetch-pr-reviewSkill
- fresh-eyes-reviewSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoverSkill
- harden-artifactSkill
- maintainer-reviewSkill
- memory-doctorSkill
- prepare-promptSkill
- refine-pr-reviewSkill
- refine-ticketSkill
- review-code-assistantSkill
- review-ticketSkill
- run-nx-checksSkill
- self-improveSkill
- self-reviewSkill
- split-plan-tasksSkill
- use-conversational-languageSkill
- verify-understandingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 67
Must stand on its own: a complete, readable version of the ticket with enough metadata that a fresh session can identify the source without …
- Very specific: line 119
If a fetch fails, list the link with (unable to fetch) rather than failing the whole run.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ticket Fetcher
Fetch only — no analysis, requirements, or planning. Output is a self-contained .TICKET.md.
Source & access
Identify the tracker from the input (URL host, or id shape) and fetch through the matching MCP
server — e.g. Azure DevOps MCP for ADO work items, Atlassian MCP for Jira issues, GitHub
MCP / gh for GitHub issues. Use whichever equivalent tools are connected; tool name prefixes
vary by config. Resolve once any handle the MCP needs (e.g. Atlassian cloudId, ADO project) and
reuse it. A bare id that fits several trackers: the one the project's governing docs name, else
the Source host all ticket files in the planning directory share, else the only connected
tracker MCP; still open → ask, naming your pick. If no matching MCP is connected: a public ticket
may be scraped from its URL as a fallback (you may still suggest installing the matching MCP when
it would do the job better); a private one can't — the URL returns a login page, not the ticket —
so stop and tell the user to install and authenticate the matching MCP server, then re-run.
Your task
- Resolve the input. Accept a full ticket URL or a bare id/key; extract the identifier. If the
tracker uses a key prefix (e.g.
XX-1234), keep it; otherwise use the bare number. If the input is unrecognizable, ask. - Fetch the ticket. Get the work item/issue with its full field set, comments inline, and related links/relations expanded. Capture everything the ticket carries — don't pre-filter to a fixed set of fields. Convert whatever rich-text form you get (HTML, ADF, …) to clean Markdown.
- Pick a slug. Short kebab-case slug, 3–5 words, from the title/summary — greppable, don't overthink it.
Decide the output directory. First resolve the project's planning directory: the one its governing docs name or already in use, default
.agents/plans/. Inside it, first match wins:- Re-fetch — the ticket already has a plan directory or flat
.TICKET.md: write to the next<id>-<slug>-v2,-v3, … name beside it, the file named like its directory (<id>-<slug>-vN/<id>-<slug>-vN.TICKET.md, or flat<id>-<slug>-vN.TICKET.md), and say so in the result — never overwrite; history per re-fetch is kept on purpose. - Existing family — an ancestor (parent/epic, nearest first) has a plan directory
(
<ancestor-id>-*, hyphen included; confirm via its.TICKET.mdthat it's really that ancestor's; latest-vNwhen several), or a group directory's## Ticket setlists this ticket or a sibling: write flat into it (<dir>/<id>-<slug>.TICKET.md) and update the## Ticket setsections per multiple-tickets.md. - Otherwise — a new
<id>-<slug>/subdirectory.
In doubt at any point (unsure a directory is really the family's, …): ask the user, proposing the answer you would pick. Never guess — better one extra question than a potential mistake.
- Re-fetch — the ticket already has a plan directory or flat
- Write the ticket file at
<output-dir>/<id>-<slug>.TICKET.md,<id>-<slug>-vN.TICKET.mdon a re-fetch. - Download attachments — if the ticket carries attachments, inline images, external linked assets, or design-tool links, read attachments.md first, then download into the output directory; warn on any that fail.
- Print the result — project-relative paths and the next-step line (see Next step).
Multiple tickets
The input may list several tickets — before picking slugs and directories, read
multiple-tickets.md: it governs grouping into shared directories, the
## Ticket set section, and per-ticket launch commands.
Ticket file structure
Must stand on its own: a complete, readable version of the ticket with enough metadata that a fresh session can identify the source without re-fetching.
Header
Plain markdown header with source metadata; omit any line whose value is absent. Include whatever the tracker provides. Example:
# <title / summary>
> **Source** [<id>](<url>)
> **Type** {type}
> **Status** {status}
> **Assignee** {display name or "—"}
> **Reporter / Created by** {display name}
> **Labels / Tags** {joined or "—"}
> **Fetched** {today YYYY-MM-DD}Body sections
A grouped ticket's ## Ticket set comes first, directly after the header — see
multiple-tickets.md. Then, in this order, only if present and non-empty:
## Description## Acceptance criteria— if the tracker has a dedicated AC field populated## <Other fields>— one section per other populated field carrying real content (technical notes, custom fields, …), headed by the field's display name. Capture everything the ticket holds.## Comments— oldest first, each### <author> — <date>then the body. Best-effort: if comments aren't returned, note it briefly or omit the section.## Related tickets— see below## Attachments— see attachments.md## Design references— see attachments.md
Preserve heading hierarchy, bullet structure, emphasis, and code blocks; map in-field subheadings to
####. Omit empty sections. Quote user-facing strings, code identifiers, file paths, i18n keys, and
URLs verbatim — never alter or translate them.
Related tickets
From the response's links/relations (and any remote-link tool), for each unique linked ticket (excluding this one) fetch only title + status + type via a cheap call — not the full body. The main goal is that there is a trace of all related tickets, so they can be fetched later if needed. One bullet each, with the relationship if available:
- [<id>](<url>) — (<type>, <status>) <title>For non-ticket remote links (e.g. a wiki/Confluence page), emit the title and URL as a plain bullet.
If a fetch fails, list the link with (unable to fetch) rather than failing the whole run.
Attachments & design references
The full protocol — numbering, cross-MCP fetching, auth, fallback recipes, integrity checks, and entry templates — lives in attachments.md. Three rules always hold:
- Attachments include inline images in the description/fields, external linked assets, and design-tool links — not just tracker-hosted files.
- Download each straight to disk (e.g.
curl -fSL <url> -o <file>); never route one as inline base64 through the model — output caps truncate it silently. - A file you cannot fetch is still referenced with its source URL and added to the warn list — never block.
Boundaries
- Do not analyze, plan, or explore the codebase for context — this does not exempt files the ticket explicitly links, which you still fetch (see attachments.md).
- Do not modify the ticket in its tracker — fetching is read-only (no comments, transitions, edits, worklogs).
- The only files you create: the
.TICKET.md, its attachments, and any linked docs you fetched; the only edits to existing files are group members'## Ticket setsections.
Next step
State clearly when done, using project-relative paths (never absolute): the output directory,
the ticket file, and any attachments. If any attachment or design preview could not be
downloaded, first emit a clear warning headed by ⚠️ listing each missing file's name and its
source URL, instructing the user to download it and save it under that exact name so the embeds
resolve — or, with /attach-to-ticket available, to paste it (or its saved path) and run that
skill. Without
refine-ticket available the result ends there; with it, hand off the next phase as a single
copy-pasteable launch command in a fenced block — session name and prompt combined, so one paste
starts the session — in the launch syntax of the agent tool in use (vendor-agnostic — claude
below is only the example), naming the session refine-<slug>; several tickets → one block per
ticket, in the suggested execution order, under a label naming it:
claude --name refine-<slug> "/refine-ticket <output-dir>/<id>-<slug>.TICKET.md"Then offer the alternative: one line offering to clear the current session (vendor-agnostic —
/clear is only the example; use the clear command of the agent tool in use) and run the next
phase here, then the same block(s) with the bare prompt:
/refine-ticket <output-dir>/<id>-<slug>.TICKET.mdOn a re-fetch, when the highest earlier version (-v(N-1) … down to the unsuffixed
<id>-<slug>) already has a .REQUIREMENTS.md: say those requirements predate the re-fetch and
put that .REQUIREMENTS.md in both commands in place of the new ticket file (session still
refine-<slug>), noting that refining from scratch means running refine-ticket on the new
.TICKET.md instead.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

