agentleFS
e-dule-dul/opencl-lab/.claude/skills/technical-audit/SKILL.md

technical-audit

Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Procedure for auditing documentation for factual accuracy and redundancy.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Big picture: Read workflow/design/00-executive-summary.md to understand vision, philosophy and structure

    line 9
  2. Very specific:

    Analyze the Content: Read the module's *.md then its corresponding workflow/design/design_[module].md and code .h/.cpp/.cl/ CMakeLists.txt

    line 10
  3. Very specific:

    Use the web_search tool to query the internet and validate these claims against current data.

    line 13
  4. Very specific:

    Use FileEdit to strip redundant comments from the files if necessary.

    line 17
  5. Very specific:

    Use the web_search tool to provide references

    line 20

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Technical Audit Skill

Instructions

  1. Big picture: Read workflow/design/00-executive-summary.md to understand vision, philosophy and structure
  2. Analyze the Content: Read the module's *.md then its corresponding workflow/design/design_[module].md and code .h/.cpp/.cl/ CMakeLists.txt
  3. Fact Check:
    • Identify technical claims (e.g., "Nvidia has poor OpenCL 2.0 support", "stb_image doesn't support 16-bit PNGs").
    • Use the web_search tool to query the internet and validate these claims against current data.
  4. De-duplicate: Identify areas where README or code comments redundantly explain the exact same concept.
  5. Report & Fix:
    • Output an "Audit Report" listing false claims (with citations from your web search) and redundancies.
    • Use FileEdit to strip redundant comments from the files if necessary.
  6. Suggest Additional Materials:
    • Suggest external knowlegde sources to explor specific topics in depth
    • Use the web_search tool to provide references
  7. Suggest Updates:
    • Improving consistency between design to code
    • Clearly mark HW requirements and limitation if missing in README

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.