agentleFS
dvaJidvaJi/argos/.agents/skills/argos-release/SKILL.md

argos-release

Skill3 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Prepare and publish Argos releases in this repository. Use when Codex needs to bump the app version, update CHANGELOG.md, keep release notes in English, run release checks, create or update versioned release branches such as release/v0.1.0, continue a half-finished release, merge to master with the documented release flow, create or push version tags, or clean up release branches after publishing.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

28 rules. About 0 are common, 17 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈17

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 11

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Follow the repository-specific Argos release process.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Check the current branch and working tree.

    line 16
  3. Very specific:

    Check whether release/<version> exists locally or on origin.

    line 17
  4. Distinctive:

    If a local or remote tag already exists on the wrong commit, stop and ask before replacing it.

    line 20
  5. Very specific:

    Update package.json, CHANGELOG.md, and the release notes commit on master.

    line 27
  6. Very specific:

    Create release/<version> from the release-ready commit on master and push it.

    line 29
  7. Very specific:

    Use this when the release branch already exists but metadata changed afterward.

    line 31
  8. Distinctive:

    Use this only after the release PR is approved.

    line 33
  9. Distinctive:

    Use references/release-checklist.md for exact commands.

    line 35
  10. Distinctive:

    When preparing a release on master:

    line 39
  11. Very specific:

    Update package.json to the target version.

    line 41
  12. Very specific:

    Add a new CHANGELOG.md section at the top.

    line 42
  13. Distinctive:

    Prefer deriving the notes from recent commits or the diff since the previous release tag.

    line 44
  14. Distinctive:

    Do not create SDD folders for pure release metadata, branch, tag, or release PR work.

    line 45
  15. Very specific:

    Use the current local date in YYYY-MM-DD form.

    line 55
  16. Distinctive:

    After editing release metadata, run these repo-required commands:

    line 59
  17. Very specific:

    Prefer running pnpm run typecheck before cutting the release branch.

    line 65
  18. Distinctive:

    Keep master as the integration branch.

    line 69
  19. Very specific:

    Treat release/<version> as disposable and identical to a commit already on master.

    line 70
  20. Distinctive:

    Never click "Update branch" on the release PR.

    line 71
  21. Distinctive:

    After approval, merge the PR to master and create the version tag.

    line 72
  22. Distinctive:

    Read ../../../docs/release-flow.md when you need the full repository policy or if the checklist and repo docs ever diverge.

    line 74
  23. Distinctive:

    When the user says something like "the release branch already exists but the tag is not created yet" or "I fixed the changelog after …

    line 78
  24. Distinctive:

    Commit the metadata fix on master.

    line 80
  25. Distinctive:

    After approval, merge and create the tag.

    line 85
  26. Very specific:

    Use concrete versions and dates such as v0.1.0 and 2026-06-24.

    line 91
  27. Distinctive:

    Keep commands copy-pastable and repo-specific.

    line 92
  28. Distinctive:

    If checks fail, separate blocking failures from unrelated existing warnings.

    line 93

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Argos Release

Overview

Follow the repository-specific Argos release process. Prepare release metadata on master, keep CHANGELOG.md concise, and publish through the documented flow.

Start With Repo State

Inspect git state before changing anything:

  • Check the current branch and working tree.
  • Check whether release/<version> exists locally or on origin.
  • Check whether v<version> exists locally or on origin.

If a local or remote tag already exists on the wrong commit, stop and ask before replacing it.

Choose The Release Mode

Pick the mode that matches the user's request and current git state:

  1. prepare metadata Update package.json, CHANGELOG.md, and the release notes commit on master.
  2. cut release branch Create release/<version> from the release-ready commit on master and push it.
  3. update existing release branch Use this when the release branch already exists but metadata changed afterward. Commit on master, move release/<version> to the new master commit, and force-push only the disposable release branch.
  4. publish Use this only after the release PR is approved. Merge or fast-forward master, create the version tag on the same commit, push the tag, and then delete the temporary release branch.

Use references/release-checklist.md for exact commands.

Update Release Metadata

When preparing a release on master:

  • Update package.json to the target version.
  • Add a new CHANGELOG.md section at the top.
  • Summarize only user-visible or release-relevant changes since the previous tag.
  • Prefer deriving the notes from recent commits or the diff since the previous release tag.
  • Do not create SDD folders for pure release metadata, branch, tag, or release PR work.

Format changelog entries like this:

## vX.Y.Z (YYYY-MM-DD)
- English bullet
- English bullet

Use the current local date in YYYY-MM-DD form. Preserve older changelog sections unless the user explicitly asks to rewrite them.

Run Release Checks

After editing release metadata, run these repo-required commands:

  • pnpm run format
  • pnpm run i18n
  • pnpm run lint

Prefer running pnpm run typecheck before cutting the release branch. Run tests when the user asks, when the release touches behavior beyond metadata, or when risk is unclear. Report pre-existing failures separately from the release metadata work.

Follow Release Branch Policy

  • Keep master as the integration branch.
  • Treat release/<version> as disposable and identical to a commit already on master.
  • Never click "Update branch" on the release PR.
  • After approval, merge the PR to master and create the version tag.

Read ../../../docs/release-flow.md when you need the full repository policy or if the checklist and repo docs ever diverge.

Common Recovery Case

When the user says something like "the release branch already exists but the tag is not created yet" or "I fixed the changelog after cutting the release branch":

  1. Commit the metadata fix on master.
  2. Push master.
  3. Move release/<version> to HEAD.
  4. Force-push release/<version> with --force-with-lease.
  5. Continue with the existing or updated PR to master.
  6. After approval, merge and create the tag.

Response Rules

  • Act on the repo when the user wants the release advanced; do not stop at generic advice.
  • Tell the user exactly which step of the release flow they are currently in.
  • Use concrete versions and dates such as v0.1.0 and 2026-06-24.
  • Keep commands copy-pastable and repo-specific.
  • If checks fail, separate blocking failures from unrelated existing warnings.

Examples

Activate this skill for requests like:

  • "Prepare release 0.1.0, update the version number and changelog"
  • "Continue releasing 0.1.1, the release branch already exists but no tag yet"
  • "Publish release/v0.1.2 following the project flow"
  • "Check what's still missing before releasing v0.1.3"

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.