outside
Skill31 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub
Checks prior art, related workspace projects, and relevant notes before choosing an approach. Use for /outside, "get an outside view", "check prior art", "are we reinventing the wheel", or "has anyone already built this". Runs one bounded reconnaissance pass without helper agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Check the workspace: Search the two or three most plausible related projects' state, decisions, and specs.
- Distinctive: line 15
If the request includes fixing a concrete defect, apply the supported fix within the authorized scope and report it.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Outside view
- Orient. For project work, read current state and instructions to EOF. Extract relevant decisions and failed approaches before searching.
- Frame. State the problem independently of the proposed solution and identify the current approach being assessed.
- Find shipped solutions. Start with one to three targeted web searches. Check maintained libraries or components for build work, the relevant major platforms' approaches, and how the best practitioners of the deliverable do it (skilled people's methods, not only tools built for it), answered with a link or marked not found; within the search cap, fold that question into another search rather than drop it. Prefer primary documentation and working repositories. Expand only if a specific evidence gap prevents a useful conclusion.
- Check the workspace. Search the two or three most plausible related projects' state, decisions, and specs. If ignore rules hide files, use explicit paths or an appropriate no-ignore search.
- Check notes. Read a relevant note when the project points to it. Either way, run one bounded topic lookup (filenames and content, one to three topic terms) over the notes folders that hold reference material on this topic, such as saved resources, web clippings, and the matching project or area folder, because a saved workflow or clipping on this exact topic is the cheapest prior art there is. Read the best hit. This step is done only with a hit read, or with the lookup's no-hits or notes-unavailable result stated in the report; a project pointer, or the absence of one, is never coverage on its own. Stay on topic: no trawl of personal notes, no folders the topic does not touch.
- Report. Lead with whether the current approach survives, changes, or should be replaced, and why. Present a few materially different options with inline source links or file locations, then one concrete next action. Adopt or adapt shipped work by default; explain evidence-based reasons for building from scratch.
If the request includes fixing a concrete defect, apply the supported fix within the authorized scope and report it. A research request alone does not authorize implementation.
Cite each finding and label gaps. Do not manufacture alternatives when the evidence supports the existing approach. Save a findings document only when project conventions or the user request call for one; table deeper research as the next action rather than starting an unrelated investigation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

