Capture Learning

Turns an in-session explanation into a durable artifact in whatever learning-resource location is paired with the current project — never assume any specific stack or repo name. Discover everything about the target from its own docs each time.

1. Find the paired learning-resource location

Check the current project's own memory mechanism, in order, stop at first hit:

1. If a .beads/ dir exists here: bd memories learning-resource / bd recall learning-resource-location.
2. Else check this session's file-based memory for a reference-type entry pointing at a learning location.
3. Nothing found → ask the user for the path once. Save it back using whichever mechanism the project already uses (bd remember learning-resource-location "<path> (<what for>)" if beads, else a reference-type memory file) so it's only asked once per project.

This same lookup also covers the exercises-root (step 5) — the location is stable per project even though where a given capture fits inside it is not.

2. Read the target location's own conventions

Read that location's CLAUDE.md (or README.md if no CLAUDE.md) to learn its actual structure: cheat-sheet file names/paths, style contract, exercise/GOAL.md format, any regen command (e.g. a TOC generator). Do not bring in assumptions from any other stack — every convention comes from what's read here, every session.

No CLAUDE.md/README.md yet (first capture at this location) → ask the user briefly for format preferences and suggest writing a minimal convention doc for next time, so the next capture doesn't have to ask again.

3. Check existing coverage

Grep the relevant reference file(s)' headings/TOC for the concept. Already covered → propose an amendment, not a duplicate section.

4. Draft the cheat-sheet addition

Follow the target location's own style contract exactly (terseness, example format, citation format, whatever it specifies) — never apply a generic style. Use different data/examples than that location's own exercises use, if it has that rule.

Show the draft and stop. Do not write until the user approves. If the cheat sheet didn't already cover this and the wording needs iteration, iterate on the draft with the user rather than settling for a one-shot explanation.

On approval: write it, then run the location's regen/TOC command if one exists.

5. Optionally propose an exercise

Ask whether this warrants a new exercise step, or a new exercise. If yes:

• Never infer placement. Show the existing exercise list/order and ask the user where this fits (which exercise it's a step of, or where a new one slots in relative to the others). Ordering is a curriculum judgment (prerequisites, difficulty progression) — not derivable from file structure.
• First exercise insertion ever at this location → also ask how mid-sequence inserts should be handled structurally (renumber trailing exercises vs. a suffix like 04b-name), and write the answer into that location's CLAUDE.md so future captures don't re-ask.
• Scaffold only on explicit yes, using the exercise/GOAL.md conventions read in step 2.

Non-goals

• Never write code for the user inside the target location's exercises — same prime directive as any tutoring context, if the target location has one (check its CLAUDE.md).
• Never invent a cheat-sheet style not already established at the target location.
• Never touch the current project's own source — this skill only writes to the paired learning-resource location.