agentleFS
dspace-groupdspace-group/SystemDeskMCP/.github/skills/smoke-test/SKILL.md

smoke-test

Skill3 starsChanged 15 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

End-to-end smoke test for the SystemDesk MCP server.

21 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use debugging-difficult-bugs, pr-explainer and 1 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • dzevsSkill

    debugging-difficult-bugs

    Use early when debugging a medium or hard bug, especially when tests alone may not reveal the real runtime failure. Trigger this before extended TDD iteration when a bug involves runtime state, PTY/terminal ordering, persistence, streaming, async/concurrency, the TUI/manual reproduction, the IPC socket layer, or when a red or newly passing test may not model the real issue. Skip only when the root cause is already directly proven by a stack trace or deterministic test that exercises the real runtime path.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Mathews-TomSkill

    pr-explainer

    Use when a developer asks to explain a pushed PR, walk through a PR stack, understand one stack member, or explain what an AI agent just pushed so they can connect code changes to end-to-end functionality and update domain knowledge. Not for defect review, merge approval, PR-body authoring, or full-repository onboarding.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • dzevsSkill

    pr-splitter

    Use when breaking a large, complex, messy, or hard-to-review pull request into multiple smaller PRs; planning stacked PRs; extracting independent changes from a branch; splitting mixed refactor and behavior changes; managing drift after review feedback (operator gate, Codex/swarm second opinion); rebasing follow-up PRs as earlier PRs change; or preserving original branch intent while shipping incrementally.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 18 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use the SystemDesk MCP Server to perform an end-to-end smoke test, ensuring that the core functionalities are working as expected.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Do NOT inspect the files in this workspace, only rely on the information provided in this prompt and by the MCP server.

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    Do NOT read the repository memory or state from previous sessions.

    line 14
  4. Distinctive:

    Do NOT write to the repository memory.

    line 15
  5. Distinctive:

    Always clean up any created directories or files after the test execution, regardless of the test results.

    line 19
  6. Very specific:

    Import tests\smoke-test.arxml and create a composition at /SWA/Compositions/SmokeComposition containing /SWA/A and /SWA/B.

    line 21
  7. Distinctive:

    Use the tools provided by the SystemDesk MCP server to validate the project.

    line 22
  8. Distinctive:

    After validation, use the tools provided by the SystemDesk MCP server to get the status of SystemDesk and whether a project is opened.

    line 30

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 18 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Goal

Use the SystemDesk MCP Server to perform an end-to-end smoke test, ensuring that the core functionalities are working as expected.

Rules

  • Work in %TEMP% for any file or directory creation. Do not create files or directories outside of this location.
  • Do NOT inspect the files in this workspace, only rely on the information provided in this prompt and by the MCP server.
  • Do NOT read the repository memory or state from previous sessions. Fail the run, if it happens.
  • Do NOT write to the repository memory. Fail the run and delete the created memory, if it happens.

Instructions

  1. Always clean up any created directories or files after the test execution, regardless of the test results.
  2. SystemDesk.exe should not be running before the test starts.
  3. Import tests\smoke-test.arxml and create a composition at /SWA/Compositions/SmokeComposition containing /SWA/A and /SWA/B.
  4. Use the tools provided by the SystemDesk MCP server to validate the project. The following results are expected from the validation:
    • 1 Error
      • /SWA/B/InternalBehavior/DataReceivedEvent is missing the "DataIref".
    • 4 Warnings
      • /SWA/A/InternalBehavior/Runnable is not triggered by any event.
      • /SWA/RootComposition/AssemblySwConnector_022a6a18ca20b376e84badaf962bf0ac is an incompatible connection.
      • /SWA/Compositions/SmokeComposition has two warnings for unconnected receiver elements B.RPort.E1 and B.RPort.E2.
  5. After validation, use the tools provided by the SystemDesk MCP server to get the status of SystemDesk and whether a project is opened. The expected results are:
    • SystemDesk is running.
    • A project is opened.
    • The project is modified.
  6. Close SystemDesk.
  7. SystemDesk.exe should not be running after the test finishes. Allow a grace period for it to close properly.

Fail the test if any of the expected results are not met, or if SystemDesk.exe is running at the wrong times.

Output

Provide a summary of the results. Be pedantic if something seems wrong. Be concise.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.