agentleFS
drvossdrvoss/everything-copilot-cli/skills/workflow/commit-workflow/SKILL.md

commit-workflow

Skill48 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when you're about to commit (especially with a mixed diff) to stage changes, split into atomic commits, and write Conventional Commit messages with emoji

  • Reads credentials

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before every commit — to enforce conventional commit format consistently

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    When a diff mixes multiple logical concerns (feat + refactor + docs)

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    When you want emoji-annotated commits for visual git history

    line 16
  4. Distinctive:

    If nothing is staged, stage everything and inspect what changed:

    line 28
  5. Distinctive:

    Ask: *Do these changes serve more than one logical purpose?*

    line 63
  6. Distinctive:

    If splitting, use git add -p to stage partial hunks:

    line 71
  7. Distinctive:

    No issue or PR reference in the commit message

    line 170
  8. Distinctive:

    One commit = one revert: if reverting a commit breaks something unrelated, it wasn't atomic

    line 184
  9. Very specific:

    CI commit lint: if you enforce the format with commitlint, configure it to accept the leading emoji

    line 187

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Commit Workflow

When to Use

  • Before every commit — to enforce conventional commit format consistently
  • When a diff mixes multiple logical concerns (feat + refactor + docs)
  • When you want emoji-annotated commits for visual git history
  • In teams that enforce Conventional Commits via CI

Prerequisites

  • Changes staged or present as unstaged modifications
  • Optional: pre-commit hooks configured (husky, pre-commit, or similar)

Workflow

1. Stage and Inspect

If nothing is staged, stage everything and inspect what changed:

# Check current state
git --no-pager status --short

# Stage all if nothing is staged
$staged = git --no-pager diff --cached --name-only
if (-not $staged) { git add -A }

# Review the diff
git --no-pager diff --cached --stat

2. Run Pre-Commit Checks (Optional)

# Node.js projects
npm run lint; if ($LASTEXITCODE -eq 0) { npm run build }

# Python projects
ruff check .; if ($LASTEXITCODE -eq 0) { pytest --tb=short -q }

# Generic pre-commit hooks
pre-commit run --all-files

Skip with --no-verify flag on the final commit if checks are handled externally.

3. Analyze the Diff for Atomic Splits

git --no-pager diff --cached

Ask: Do these changes serve more than one logical purpose?

Split when changes involve:

  • Different concerns (e.g., new feature and bug fix)
  • Different file types (e.g., source code and documentation)
  • Different modules with no dependency between them

If splitting, use git add -p to stage partial hunks:

git add -p   # interactive hunk selection

4. Write the Commit Message

Format: <emoji> <type>(<scope>): <imperative description>

Type → Emoji mapping (most common):

TypeEmojiUse for
feat✨New feature
fix🐛Bug fix
fix🚑️Critical hotfix
docs📝Documentation only
style💄Formatting, no logic change
refactor♻️Code change without feat/fix
perf⚡️Performance improvement
test✅Adding or fixing tests
chore🔧Build, tooling, config
ci👷CI/CD changes
revert⏪️Reverting a change
wip🚧Work in progress
security🔒️Security fix
breaking💥Breaking change
deps➕Add dependency
deps➖Remove dependency

Rules:

  • First line ≤ 72 characters
  • Imperative mood: "add feature" not "added feature"
  • Scope is optional: feat(auth): add JWT refresh
git commit -m "✨ feat(api): add pagination to /users endpoint"

5. Multi-Commit Flow (Split Changes)

# First logical unit
git add src/api/users.ts
git commit -m "✨ feat(api): add cursor-based pagination to users endpoint"

# Second logical unit
git add docs/api.md
git commit -m "📝 docs(api): document pagination parameters for users endpoint"

# Third logical unit (cleanup found along the way)
git add src/utils/query.ts
git commit -m "♻️ refactor(utils): extract page-size validation into shared helper"

Examples

Feature with Docs

git add -A
git commit -m "✨ feat(notifications): add real-time push alerts via WebSocket

- Implement WebSocket connection pool
- Add client-side reconnect logic with exponential backoff
- Write integration tests for disconnect/reconnect scenarios"

Hotfix

git add src/auth/token.ts
git commit -m "🚑️ fix(auth): prevent JWT secret from leaking into error logs"

Breaking Change

git commit -m "💥 feat(config)!: rename API_KEY to COPILOT_API_KEY

BREAKING CHANGE: rename environment variable API_KEY → COPILOT_API_KEY.
Update .env files and CI secrets before deploying."

Common Rationalizations

RationalizationReality
"Commit fast, clean up messages later"Messages written later lose the original context. The intent at commit time is the most accurate.
"WIP commits will be squashed later"PRs more often merge without squashing. Write meaningful commits from the start.
"Nobody reads commit messages"git log, git blame, and git bisect all depend on commit messages.
"It's a small change, no type prefix needed"Small changes are the easiest to classify. Without classification, changelogs become impossible.

Red Flags

  • Meaningless commit messages like fix, update, changes, stuff
  • Multiple unrelated changes bundled in one commit
  • No issue or PR reference in the commit message
  • Hundreds of lines of changes committed as "minor fix"
  • Tests and implementation in separate commits for the same feature

Verification

  • Commit message follows the format above (<emoji> <type>(<scope>): description)
  • Each commit contains exactly one logical change
  • Breaking changes are marked with BREAKING CHANGE:
  • git log --oneline tells a readable story of the changes

Tips

  • Check git log --oneline after — if you can't parse the history at a glance, the messages need work
  • One commit = one revert: if reverting a commit breaks something unrelated, it wasn't atomic
  • Use git commit --amend to fix the last message before pushing
  • git add -p is your friend for splitting mixed diffs without stashing
  • CI commit lint: if you enforce the format with commitlint, configure it to accept the leading emoji

See Also

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.