agentleFS
drvossdrvoss/everything-copilot-cli/skills/product/opportunity-solution-tree/SKILL.md

opportunity-solution-tree

Skill48 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when you need to ensure every feature in the backlog connects to a measurable business outcome — applies Teresa Torres' OST framework to map outcomes → opportunities → solutions → experiments.

21 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use prioritization-advisor, outcome-roadmap and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • nandanosqlSkill

    prioritization-advisor

    Guide PMs in choosing the right prioritization framework — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Value vs Effort, Cost of Delay — by asking adaptive questions about product stage, team context, and data availability.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • skytiger6724Skill

    outcome-roadmap

    Transform an output-focused roadmap into an outcome-focused one that communicates strategic intent. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impacts. Use when shifting to outcome roadmaps, making a roadmap more strategic, or rewriting feature lists as outcomes.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • nandanosqlSkill

    business-health-diagnostic

    Run a comprehensive business health check across revenue, unit economics, product metrics, and market position — identifying strengths, weaknesses, and the single most important metric to fix.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • skytiger6724Skill

    brainstorm-experiments-new

    Design lean startup experiments (pretotypes) for a new product. Creates XYZ hypotheses and suggests low-effort validation methods like landing pages, explainer videos, and pre-orders. Use when validating a new product idea, creating pretotypes, or testing market demand.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • About-IntelligenceSkill

    product-name

    Brainstorm 5 unique, memorable product names with rationale aligned to brand values and target audience.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • launchapp-devSkill

    interview-script

    Create a structured user interview script with warm-up, core exploration, and wrap-up sections. Use when preparing for user research interviews to ensure consistent, insightful conversations.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • +4 more from skytiger6724

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 20 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Keep one outcome metric, then decompose it into two to four leading input metrics the team can move weekly.

    line 48
  2. Distinctive:

    Use the session database to track OST items:

    line 116
  3. Distinctive:

    Separate opportunity discovery from solution generation: Don't jump to solutions before mapping pains.

    line 158

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 20 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Opportunity Solution Tree (OST)

Teresa Torres' Opportunity Solution Tree prevents building features that don't matter. It ensures every solution you build is connected to a real user pain and a business outcome you care about.

The Framework

Desired Outcome
└── Opportunity 1 (user pain / unmet need)
│   ├── Solution A
│   │   ├── Experiment 1
│   │   └── Experiment 2
│   └── Solution B
└── Opportunity 2
    └── Solution C

Outcome: A measurable business goal (OKR-level: "Increase trial-to-paid conversion by 15%") Opportunity: A user pain, unmet need, or desire (discovered through research) Solution: A product change that might address the opportunity Experiment: The smallest thing you can build to test if the solution works

Workflow

Step 1: Define the Desired Outcome

> I'm building the OST for: [product/feature area]
>
> Help me define 1 crisp desired outcome. It should be:
> - Measurable (has a metric)
> - Achievable within the quarter
> - Aligned with business goals
>
> Context: Our goal is [business context]. Key metric: [current baseline].

Keep one outcome metric, then decompose it into two to four leading input metrics the team can move weekly. The outcome is usually lagging; for each input, state the causal contribution you expect and how the team can influence it. This preserves one outcome at a time while allowing several diagnostic and actionable inputs beneath it.

Step 2: Map the Opportunity Space

> Now let's map the opportunity space for this outcome.
>
> Based on [user research / support tickets / interview data / NPS feedback]:
> > [paste data here]
>
> Identify the top 5-7 user opportunities (pains, needs, desires) that, if addressed,
> would most directly improve [outcome metric].
>
> Format as a prioritized list with a one-sentence "when I [situation], I struggle to [pain]" statement for each.

Step 3: Generate Solutions

For each top opportunity:

> For the opportunity: "[opportunity statement]"
>
> Generate 5-7 possible solutions. Include:
> - Conventional solutions (what everyone would build)
> - Lateral solutions (unexpected approaches)
> - Low-tech or process solutions (not just feature builds)
>
> For each, estimate: effort (S/M/L), confidence (Low/Med/High), impact potential (Low/Med/High)

Step 4: Design Experiments

For your top-priority solution:

> For solution: "[solution name]"
>
> Design 3 experiments to test the core assumption, ordered from least to most expensive:
> 1. A concierge experiment (manual, no code)
> 2. A fake door / prototype test
> 3. An MVP build
>
> For each experiment, define:
> - The hypothesis: "We believe [solution] will [expected outcome] because [reason]"
> - The success metric
> - The time box

Step 5: Build the Tree Visualization

> Generate a Markdown-formatted OST for:
>
> Outcome: [outcome]
> Opportunities: [list]
> Solutions per opportunity: [list]
> Experiments for priority solution: [list]
>
> Use nested Markdown lists with clear labels for each level.
> Add a "Current Focus" indicator on the solution we're pursuing.

SQL Tracking

Use the session database to track OST items:

CREATE TABLE ost_items (
    id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
    type TEXT,  -- outcome | opportunity | solution | experiment
    parent_id TEXT,
    title TEXT,
    status TEXT DEFAULT 'active',
    metric TEXT,
    notes TEXT
);

INSERT INTO ost_items VALUES
  ('O1', 'outcome', NULL, 'Increase trial-to-paid conversion 15%', 'active', 'trial_conversion_rate', ''),
  ('OP1', 'opportunity', 'O1', 'Onboarding takes too long to first value', 'active', NULL, ''),
  ('S1', 'solution', 'OP1', 'Progressive disclosure of features', 'active', NULL, ''),
  ('E1', 'experiment', 'S1', 'Show only 3 steps to first task', 'in_progress', 'time_to_first_task', '');

Example: SaaS Conversion OST

Outcome: Increase trial-to-paid conversion rate from 12% to 18%

Opportunity 1: Users don't reach the "aha moment" before trial ends
  Solution A: Personalized onboarding based on role
    Experiment 1: Wizard with role selection (concierge test, 1 week)
    Experiment 2: Role-based dashboard (2-week MVP)
  Solution B: Proactive success manager outreach at day 3

Opportunity 2: Users don't trust us with their real data during trial
  Solution A: Pre-loaded demo data matching user's industry
  Solution B: "Import 10 rows free" limited trial import

Opportunity 3: Trial users don't share product with team
  Solution A: Collaborative invitation flow mid-trial

Tips

  • One outcome at a time: A single team can only optimize one metric at a time. Multiple outcomes = diffused focus.
  • Separate opportunity discovery from solution generation: Don't jump to solutions before mapping pains.
  • Experiments > builds: The goal is to learn cheaply. Most solutions shouldn't become builds.
  • Continuous tree: OST is a living document. Update it weekly as you learn.
  • Start with existing data: Support tickets, NPS verbatims, and session recordings are free opportunity maps.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.