opportunity-solution-tree
Skill48 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when you need to ensure every feature in the backlog connects to a measurable business outcome — applies Teresa Torres' OST framework to map outcomes → opportunities → solutions → experiments.
21 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- daviszhen/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- varunk130/claude-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 24, 2026
- fahadnari/Claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- The-Utopia-Studio/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use prioritization-advisor, outcome-roadmap and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nandanosqlSkillprioritization-advisor
Guide PMs in choosing the right prioritization framework — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Value vs Effort, Cost of Delay — by asking adaptive questions about product stage, team context, and data availability.
Also in 5 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skilloutcome-roadmap
Transform an output-focused roadmap into an outcome-focused one that communicates strategic intent. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impacts. Use when shifting to outcome roadmaps, making a roadmap more strategic, or rewriting feature lists as outcomes.
Also in 7 projects that use this
nandanosqlSkillbusiness-health-diagnostic
Run a comprehensive business health check across revenue, unit economics, product metrics, and market position — identifying strengths, weaknesses, and the single most important metric to fix.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-experiments-new
Design lean startup experiments (pretotypes) for a new product. Creates XYZ hypotheses and suggests low-effort validation methods like landing pages, explainer videos, and pre-orders. Use when validating a new product idea, creating pretotypes, or testing market demand.
Also in 7 projects that use this
About-IntelligenceSkillproduct-name
Brainstorm 5 unique, memorable product names with rationale aligned to brand values and target audience.
Also in 6 projects that use this
launchapp-devSkillinterview-script
Create a structured user interview script with warm-up, core exploration, and wrap-up sections. Use when preparing for user research interviews to ensure consistent, insightful conversations.
Also in 8 projects that use this
- +4 more from skytiger6724
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 21
- deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills★ 7.7ksame name
- itseffi/agentic-os★ 114same name
- avelikiy/great_cto★ 112same name
- aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace★ 34same name
- DIAL-Studio/pm-agent-harness-kit★ 12same name
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6same name
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2same name
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2same name
- agrivisionai/claude-skills★ 1same name
- berkcapar/product-management-skills★ 1same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository111 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- COPILOT-INSTRUCTIONS.mdCopilot instructions
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- ai-visibilitySkill
- content-strategySkill
- seoSkill
- actions-debuggingSkill
- agentic-engineeringSkill
- autopilot-patternsSkill
- background-agentSkill
- context-primeSkill
- copilot-memorySkill
- cross-session-memorySkill
- ecosystem-intakeSkill
- fleet-parallelSkill
- github-code-searchSkill
- github-codespaces-efficiencySkill
- github-issue-triageSkill
- github-pr-workflowSkill
- ide-switchingSkill
- knowledge-curatorSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- mcp-ecosystemSkill
- multi-model-strategySkill
- plan-mode-masterySkill
- scope-guardSkill
- session-managementSkill
- stack-detectorSkill
- sub-agent-sandboxingSkill
- task-intake-routerSkill
- team-plannerSkill
- token-cost-optimizerSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- cpp-debuggingSkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- fix-build-errorsSkill
- fix-github-issueSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- nestjs-prismaSkill
- nextjs-prismaSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- pr-multi-perspective-reviewSkill
- prototypeSkill
- react-vitestSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- refactor-cleanSkill
- reviewSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- source-driven-developmentSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
- zoom-outSkill
- add-to-changelogSkill
- api-documentationSkill
- architecture-decisionsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 20 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 48
Keep one outcome metric, then decompose it into two to four leading input metrics the team can move weekly.
- Distinctive: line 116
Use the session database to track OST items:
- Distinctive: line 158
Separate opportunity discovery from solution generation: Don't jump to solutions before mapping pains.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 20 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Opportunity Solution Tree (OST)
Teresa Torres' Opportunity Solution Tree prevents building features that don't matter. It ensures every solution you build is connected to a real user pain and a business outcome you care about.
The Framework
Desired Outcome
└── Opportunity 1 (user pain / unmet need)
│ ├── Solution A
│ │ ├── Experiment 1
│ │ └── Experiment 2
│ └── Solution B
└── Opportunity 2
└── Solution COutcome: A measurable business goal (OKR-level: "Increase trial-to-paid conversion by 15%") Opportunity: A user pain, unmet need, or desire (discovered through research) Solution: A product change that might address the opportunity Experiment: The smallest thing you can build to test if the solution works
Workflow
Step 1: Define the Desired Outcome
> I'm building the OST for: [product/feature area]
>
> Help me define 1 crisp desired outcome. It should be:
> - Measurable (has a metric)
> - Achievable within the quarter
> - Aligned with business goals
>
> Context: Our goal is [business context]. Key metric: [current baseline].Keep one outcome metric, then decompose it into two to four leading input metrics the team can move weekly. The outcome is usually lagging; for each input, state the causal contribution you expect and how the team can influence it. This preserves one outcome at a time while allowing several diagnostic and actionable inputs beneath it.
Step 2: Map the Opportunity Space
> Now let's map the opportunity space for this outcome.
>
> Based on [user research / support tickets / interview data / NPS feedback]:
> > [paste data here]
>
> Identify the top 5-7 user opportunities (pains, needs, desires) that, if addressed,
> would most directly improve [outcome metric].
>
> Format as a prioritized list with a one-sentence "when I [situation], I struggle to [pain]" statement for each.Step 3: Generate Solutions
For each top opportunity:
> For the opportunity: "[opportunity statement]"
>
> Generate 5-7 possible solutions. Include:
> - Conventional solutions (what everyone would build)
> - Lateral solutions (unexpected approaches)
> - Low-tech or process solutions (not just feature builds)
>
> For each, estimate: effort (S/M/L), confidence (Low/Med/High), impact potential (Low/Med/High)Step 4: Design Experiments
For your top-priority solution:
> For solution: "[solution name]"
>
> Design 3 experiments to test the core assumption, ordered from least to most expensive:
> 1. A concierge experiment (manual, no code)
> 2. A fake door / prototype test
> 3. An MVP build
>
> For each experiment, define:
> - The hypothesis: "We believe [solution] will [expected outcome] because [reason]"
> - The success metric
> - The time boxStep 5: Build the Tree Visualization
> Generate a Markdown-formatted OST for:
>
> Outcome: [outcome]
> Opportunities: [list]
> Solutions per opportunity: [list]
> Experiments for priority solution: [list]
>
> Use nested Markdown lists with clear labels for each level.
> Add a "Current Focus" indicator on the solution we're pursuing.SQL Tracking
Use the session database to track OST items:
CREATE TABLE ost_items (
id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
type TEXT, -- outcome | opportunity | solution | experiment
parent_id TEXT,
title TEXT,
status TEXT DEFAULT 'active',
metric TEXT,
notes TEXT
);
INSERT INTO ost_items VALUES
('O1', 'outcome', NULL, 'Increase trial-to-paid conversion 15%', 'active', 'trial_conversion_rate', ''),
('OP1', 'opportunity', 'O1', 'Onboarding takes too long to first value', 'active', NULL, ''),
('S1', 'solution', 'OP1', 'Progressive disclosure of features', 'active', NULL, ''),
('E1', 'experiment', 'S1', 'Show only 3 steps to first task', 'in_progress', 'time_to_first_task', '');Example: SaaS Conversion OST
Outcome: Increase trial-to-paid conversion rate from 12% to 18%
Opportunity 1: Users don't reach the "aha moment" before trial ends
Solution A: Personalized onboarding based on role
Experiment 1: Wizard with role selection (concierge test, 1 week)
Experiment 2: Role-based dashboard (2-week MVP)
Solution B: Proactive success manager outreach at day 3
Opportunity 2: Users don't trust us with their real data during trial
Solution A: Pre-loaded demo data matching user's industry
Solution B: "Import 10 rows free" limited trial import
Opportunity 3: Trial users don't share product with team
Solution A: Collaborative invitation flow mid-trialTips
- One outcome at a time: A single team can only optimize one metric at a time. Multiple outcomes = diffused focus.
- Separate opportunity discovery from solution generation: Don't jump to solutions before mapping pains.
- Experiments > builds: The goal is to learn cheaply. Most solutions shouldn't become builds.
- Continuous tree: OST is a living document. Update it weekly as you learn.
- Start with existing data: Support tickets, NPS verbatims, and session recordings are free opportunity maps.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

