agentleFS
drevendevdrevendev/HungryCrab/skills/license/SKILL.md

license

Skill5 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub

Decide what may be carried over from a prey repository under its license. Modes are COPY, COPY_FILE, REIMPLEMENT, IDEAS_ONLY and HUMAN. Use when a nutrient's license mode is unclear, when asked whether code or configs from another repository may be copied, or when a sniff verdict says HUMAN. Do not use to choose the maw's own license, for general legal advice, or for licensing questions unrelated to prey-to-maw transfer.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions2 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 2

    1. apache/skywalking★ 25ksame name
    2. Pradnyeshp/Claude-Skills★ 2same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use its established result, never a hand-edited mode.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Use the actual maw's verdict for adoption decisions.

    line 58

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

License rules

The verdict is produced by a deterministic engine (crab sniff, license.json in a digest). Your job is to apply the mode, explain it, and stop when the engine says HUMAN. The repository overview and an established selected-path verdict have separate scope. discover packet exposes immutable path grants; explore register and serve share the resolver. An equivalent nested grant, a notice-only COPYRIGHT or a separate licence specimen need not relicense unrelated implementation files. The CLI retains actual grants and all applicable notices. Use its established result, never a hand-edited mode. Unknown components, missing notices, conflicting grants and unsupported references stay held; MIT-only applies to the selected material.

Modes

ModeAllowedRequired
COPYcopy code, configs and textkeep the copyright notice; publish through crab serve --as pr-branch with a materialization receipt (the serve skill), which records the source in .crab/attributions.json and renders THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md; Apache-2.0 also needs the NOTICE file's attribution notices carried over
COPY_FILEcopy whole files (MPL-2.0, EPL, CC-BY-SA documents)the file keeps its own license header; do not merge it into files under the maw license; every file in the receipt is verbatim
REIMPLEMENTuse the prey as a specificationclean room: a spec without code, then the crab-cleanroom-impl subagent without prey-cache access; record "implemented from a specification" in the trace
IDEAS_ONLYideas, architecture, approaches, factsnot a line of code, configuration or documentation text
HUMANnothing yeta person decides; present the evidence (license.json: files, manifests, headers, conflicts)

Rules that override the matrix

  1. Issue, discussion and pull-request comment text is always IDEAS_ONLY: the copyright belongs to the commenters. Carry over the need and a link, not the text. The CLI enforces this from content origin, records the origin and cap reason in the nutrient trace, and crab serve carries that trace into the served issue; do not recalculate the cap by hand. The cap rewrites the card's title and what; your why and how are yours to keep clean, and crab serve refuses a card of any origin but licensed whose notes quote one of the prey's issue titles, in any punctuation or case, or whose notes cannot be checked.
  2. Configuration files and small snippets are not automatically free: same mode as code.
  3. Strict mode is enforced by the CLI. .crab.yml mode: strict downgrades COPY code to clean-room REIMPLEMENT; configs and templates stay copyable. menu.json records the material, maw mode and policy reason, and served issues carry the reason in their license trace. Use that verdict and the clean-room protocol; do not calculate or reverse the downgrade by hand.
  4. Per-file exceptions in license.json (vendored directories, headers with another SPDX id) override the repository license for those files.
  5. No license at all is IDEAS_ONLY with human review, not HUMAN. HUMAN is only for a license that was read and could not be classified. The two ask for different things: under IDEAS_ONLY the need and the facts may still travel, under HUMAN nothing may until a person answers.
  6. Review is a flag, not a mode. A conflict between the LICENSE file and a manifest does not change the verdict — the mode still comes from the detected license, and the digest records the conflict in license.json under conflicts with human_review: true beside it. Read both: human_review is also true for a source-available license, whose mode is IDEAS_ONLY.

How to compute a mode

  • crab sniff <prey> --maw . prints the mode for this maw.
  • license.json in the prey digest has modes_by_maw_class (permissive, gpl, proprietary maws) and verdict when a maw license was known at digest time. mode_maw_samples names the representatives: gpl is GPL-3.0-only, not the whole GPL family. Use the actual maw's verdict for adoption decisions.
  • The full matrix is in references/matrix.md.

This is a compliance aid, not legal advice; say so when the user asks about an edge case.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.